The plight and fight of unmarried fathers in obtaining primary care (custody) of their children in South Africa. Can the battle be won, and what are their rights?

By Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf (LL.B LL.M) There is a common misconception that if a child was born out of wedlock, only the mother can be the primary caregiver of the child concerned. This may however generally be the case. However, it is presumed by some that if a mother cared for the child since his or her birth, the father would not be able to be the child’s primary caregiver. In other words, the child would no longer live with the mother, but with the father. We do not blame our clients for thinking so. That is the stereotype. However, as the world changes, so does the law. We are often approached by fathers who have a child that was born out of wedlock. He and the mother most probably lived together when the child was born. But things did not work out between them. The mother moved out and lived with her parents or on her own. The father would then regularly have contact with the child. The type of contact would be decided by the mother. Now the question is, even if the child is 10 years old, is it theoretically possible for the child to be cared for by the father and live with him primarily? The answer to that is yes. This is so, as the law looks at what is best for the child concerned.

What is the best interests of the child principle when it comes to parenting?

Both the South African Constitution and the Children’s Act, says that the child’s best interests are given priority. In other words, a child’s best interests are of paramount importance in matters relating to it. Therefore, for one to assume at the outset, that only mothers are the best primary caregivers, it is not only incorrect but potentially dangerous when dealing in children matters. The law expects us to look at all factors, not only who historically looked after the child, but also, the possibility of whether the father can better care for the child go forward. Also, as the child’s best interests are of paramount importance, deciding as to whether or not to move a child from the primary care of a mother to that of the father should not be done lightly. Therefore, even if the father 10 years later, can on the face of it care better for the child than the mother, this should not be the deciding factor. One would need to look at the emotional and psychological impact it would have on the child as well.

What would be an ideal situation where moving the child from the mother to the father would be warranted?

In our view, material comforts are not reason enough to move a child from the primary care of a mother to that of a father. If the father is a wealthy person, and the mother not, he can be ordered to pay more child support towards the child’s expenses. However, if the child is of a certain age, and he needs to have certain living conditions, and the father has it, then that would be a possible factor. For example, if the child is a gifted swimmer, 17 years old and in matric, a need to train consistently, then it makes sense that the father’s living amenities may be an important factor to justify the movement of the child.

Drug Abuse, Alcohol Abuse, and Mental Illness. Are these factors?

Then there is the obvious reason to move the child from the primary care of the mother to that of the father. This would be because the mother is incapable of caring for the minor child. She may have developed a mental illness, become an uncontrollable alcoholic, or addicted to illegal drugs. However, this alone does not automatically call for the father to be the minor child’s primary caregiver. It must first be determined that he can in fact care for the child. If the father only had supervised contact with the minor child and has his own issues, then in such a case, it may be better if the child is placed in foster care.

So it all depends on the facts and circumstances of the child and parents?

What we are attempting to demonstrate above is that depending on the facts and circumstances, it may be best that a child is moved from the care of a mother who cared for the child since birth, and be placed in the care of the father. The circumstances do not necessarily have to be serious like alcoholism a drug abuse on the part of the mother. Other reasons could be the academic needs, or the preference of the child, depending on his or her age. What can a father do if he wants to have primary care of his 10-year-old child? As stated above, the law looks at what is best for the child when it comes to who is to be the primary caregiver. It is just not there for the taking. If the parents can agree to a change of primary care, then the law would in most instances respect such a decision. However, if they cannot agree, the father would have to approach the competent court. But before doing so, he should attempt to mediate the matter.

What about the Child Care expert’s recommendations (Social worker, psychologist, Office of the Family Advocate)?

If mediation fails, and the matter proceeds to court, the court may decide to call on child care experts to assist the court in the matter. A social worker, psychologist, or the office of the family advocate may be appointed to provide a report and recommendations to the court. The court would only be guided by this document. In other words, the court would not be bound by the recommendations of the experts. If the court determines based on all the facts of the matter, that it would be in the minor child’s best interests for the father to have primary care; the court would then so order it. Therefore, in answering the question posed above; yes, an unmarried father in South Africa can obtain full custody of a 10-year-old child. This depends on the facts of the matter of course. Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, Advocate of the High Court of South Africa Member of the Legal Practice Council We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws    

The plight and fight of unmarried fathers in obtaining primary care (custody) of their children in South Africa. Can the battle be won, and what are their rights?

By Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf (LL.B LL.M)

There is a common misconception that if a child was born out of wedlock, only the mother can be the primary caregiver of the child concerned. This may however generally be the case. However, it is presumed by some that if a mother cared for the child since his or her birth, the father would not be able to be the child’s primary caregiver. In other words, the child would no longer live with the mother, but with the father. We do not blame our clients for thinking so. That is the stereotype. However, as the world changes, so does the law.

We are often approached by fathers who have a child that was born out of wedlock. He and the mother most probably lived together when the child was born. But things did not work out between them. The mother moved out and lived with her parents or on her own. The father would then regularly have contact with the child. The type of contact would be decided by the mother. Now the question is, even if the child is 10 years old, is it theoretically possible for the child to be cared for by the father and live with him primarily? The answer to that is yes. This is so, as the law looks at what is best for the child concerned.

What is the best interests of the child principle when it comes to parenting?

Both the South African Constitution and the Children’s Act, says that the child’s best interests are given priority. In other words, a child’s best interests are of paramount importance in matters relating to it. Therefore, for one to assume at the outset, that only mothers are the best primary caregivers, it is not only incorrect but potentially dangerous when dealing in children matters. The law expects us to look at all factors, not only who historically looked after the child, but also, the possibility of whether the father can better care for the child go forward.

Also, as the child’s best interests are of paramount importance, deciding as to whether or not to move a child from the primary care of a mother to that of the father should not be done lightly. Therefore, even if the father 10 years later, can on the face of it care better for the child than the mother, this should not be the deciding factor. One would need to look at the emotional and psychological impact it would have on the child as well.

What would be an ideal situation where moving the child from the mother to the father would be warranted?

In our view, material comforts are not reason enough to move a child from the primary care of a mother to that of a father. If the father is a wealthy person, and the mother not, he can be ordered to pay more child support towards the child’s expenses. However, if the child is of a certain age, and he needs to have certain living conditions, and the father has it, then that would be a possible factor. For example, if the child is a gifted swimmer, 17 years old and in matric, a need to train consistently, then it makes sense that the father’s living amenities may be an important factor to justify the movement of the child.

Drug Abuse, Alcohol Abuse, and Mental Illness. Are these factors?

Then there is the obvious reason to move the child from the primary care of the mother to that of the father. This would be because the mother is incapable of caring for the minor child. She may have developed a mental illness, become an uncontrollable alcoholic, or addicted to illegal drugs. However, this alone does not automatically call for the father to be the minor child’s primary caregiver. It must first be determined that he can in fact care for the child. If the father only had supervised contact with the minor child and has his own issues, then in such a case, it may be better if the child is placed in foster care.

So it all depends on the facts and circumstances of the child and parents?

What we are attempting to demonstrate above is that depending on the facts and circumstances, it may be best that a child is moved from the care of a mother who cared for the child since birth, and be placed in the care of the father. The circumstances do not necessarily have to be serious like alcoholism a drug abuse on the part of the mother. Other reasons could be the academic needs, or the preference of the child, depending on his or her age.

What can a father do if he wants to have primary care of his 10-year-old child?

As stated above, the law looks at what is best for the child when it comes to who is to be the primary caregiver. It is just not there for the taking. If the parents can agree to a change of primary care, then the law would in most instances respect such a decision. However, if they cannot agree, the father would have to approach the competent court. But before doing so, he should attempt to mediate the matter.

What about the Child Care expert’s recommendations (Social worker, psychologist, Office of the Family Advocate)?

If mediation fails, and the matter proceeds to court, the court may decide to call on child care experts to assist the court in the matter. A social worker, psychologist, or the office of the family advocate may be appointed to provide a report and recommendations to the court. The court would only be guided by this document. In other words, the court would not be bound by the recommendations of the experts.

If the court determines based on all the facts of the matter, that it would be in the minor child’s best interests for the father to have primary care; the court would then so order it. Therefore, in answering the question posed above; yes, an unmarried father in South Africa can obtain full custody of a 10-year-old child. This depends on the facts of the matter of course.

Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, Advocate of the High Court of South Africa

Member of the Legal Practice Council

We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well.

Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links:

Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws

 

 

Related Post

What are my rights and duties under a contract? Navigating the Complex Terrain of Contract Disputes: A Simplified Guide

In the world of business and commerce, contracts serve as the backbone of transactions, defining the rights and obligations of parties involved. However, despite the careful crafting of these legal documents, disputes can still arise, leading to potential conflicts and legal battles. Contract disputes are a common occurrence in the business landscape, and understanding how to navigate through this complex terrain is crucial for businesses and individuals alike.

Understanding the Basics of Contract Disputes

Definition and Types

A contract dispute refers to a disagreement or conflict between parties arising from the interpretation, performance, or enforcement of contractual terms. These disputes can manifest in various forms, including disagreements over payment, delivery, quality of goods or services, breach of contract, or even issues related to contract formation.

Common Causes

Several factors contribute to contract disputes, ranging from ambiguities in contract language to unforeseen events affecting performance. Common causes include misunderstandings, failure to fulfill obligations, changes in circumstances, and breaches of contract terms.

Preventive Measures: Crafting Strong Contracts

Clear and Precise Language

The foundation of any contract lies in its language. Ambiguities or vague terms can become breeding grounds for disputes. Clear, precise, and unambiguous language is essential to avoid misinterpretations and disagreements. Parties should ensure that each clause is well-defined and leaves no room for multiple interpretations.

Define Roles and Responsibilities

Clearly outlining the roles and responsibilities of each party involved can help prevent disputes. This includes specifying delivery timelines, quality standards, payment terms, and any other crucial aspects of the agreement. When both parties have a shared understanding of their obligations, the likelihood of disputes decreases.

Anticipate and Address Potential Issues

Identifying potential issues and addressing them within the contract can mitigate future disputes. This may involve including contingency clauses, force majeure provisions, and mechanisms for dispute resolution. Being proactive in considering potential challenges can prevent disagreements from escalating.

Common Types of Contract Disputes

Breach of Contract

One of the most prevalent types of contract disputes is a breach of contract, wherein one party fails to fulfill its obligations as outlined in the agreement. This can include failure to deliver goods or services, non-payment, or other violations of the agreed-upon terms.

Misrepresentation

Misrepresentation occurs when one party provides false or misleading information during contract negotiations. This can lead to disputes if the misrepresented information influences the decision-making process of the other party.

Ambiguity in Contract Terms

Ambiguous contract terms can be a breeding ground for disputes. When parties interpret contract clauses differently, conflicts may arise regarding the intended meaning of specific provisions.

Unforeseen Circumstances

External events, such as natural disasters or economic downturns, can impact a party’s ability to fulfill contractual obligations. Disputes may arise over whether such events constitute a valid excuse for non-performance or if parties should seek alternative solutions.

Resolving Contract Disputes

Negotiation

Negotiation is often the first step in resolving contract disputes. Parties can engage in discussions to find mutually acceptable solutions, whether it involves adjusting terms, extending deadlines, or addressing other concerns.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

ADR methods, such as mediation or arbitration, provide alternatives to traditional litigation. These processes offer a more cost-effective and expedited means of resolving disputes outside the courtroom, with neutral third parties facilitating discussions and decision-making.

Litigation

When all else fails, parties may resort to litigation, initiating a legal process to resolve the dispute through the court system. Litigation can be time-consuming and costly, but it provides a formalized structure for addressing complex contractual issues.

Enforcing Contracts and Court Remedies

Specific Performance

In certain cases, a court may order specific performance, compelling the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations as outlined in the agreement. This remedy is often sought when monetary compensation is deemed inadequate.

Damages

Monetary damages are a common remedy in contract disputes. Depending on the nature of the breach, courts may award compensatory, consequential, or punitive damages to the aggrieved party.

Termination of Contract

When a breach is substantial, the innocent party may have the right to terminate the contract. Termination releases both parties from their remaining obligations and may trigger additional remedies outlined in the contract.

International Considerations in Contract Disputes

In an increasingly globalized business environment, contracts may involve parties from different jurisdictions. This introduces additional complexities related to choice of law, jurisdiction, and enforcement of judgments. Parties engaged in international contracts should carefully consider these factors when crafting and enforcing agreements.

Conclusion

Contract disputes are an inherent risk in the world of business, but with careful planning, clear communication, and proactive measures, parties can reduce the likelihood of conflicts. Understanding the types of disputes that commonly arise, implementing preventive measures, and knowing how to navigate the resolution process are essential components of effective contract management. Whether through negotiation, alternative dispute resolution, or litigation, parties must be prepared to address disputes promptly and effectively to protect their interests and maintain the integrity of their contractual relationships.

Advocate of the High Court of South Africa – The Advocate’s Profession in South Africa

 

Let us ask advocate Muhammad Abduroaf a few questions

[caption id="attachment_8831" align="alignleft" width="243"]Advocate High Court - Gauteng Johannesburg Eastern Cape High Court (Bhisho)
Free State High Court (Bloemfontein)
Western Cape High Court (Cape Town)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
Eastern Cape High Court (Grahamstown)
South Gauteng High Court (Johannesburg)
Northern Cape High Court (Kimberley)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Pietermaritzburg)
Eastern Cape High Court (Port Elizabeth)
North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria)
Limpopo High Court (Thohoyandou)
Eastern Cape High Court (Mthatha)
North West High Court, Mafikeng (Mmabatho) and
Polokwane Circuit Court of the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria[/caption] South African law has recently changed when it comes to advocates. Now it is possible for advocates to obtain trust accounts which were impossible in the past. By doing so, they would be allowed to take instructions directly from the public. In other words, the client does not first need to see an attorney. Here the Legal Practice Act No. 28 of 2014 comes into play. More than a year has elapsed since the Act has been operating in full swing.   Further below, we tapped into the experience of Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, a practising advocate of the High Court of South Africa. He gives us some insight into the advocate profession. Although his office is located in Cape Town, he appeared and represented clients in other towns and provinces as well.  

What is the difference between an advocate and an attorney?

Both advocates and attorneys are lawyers or legal practitioners. In simple terms, the attorney is seen as a general practitioner, and an advocate is a specialist. This is however not always the case. Many attorneys now appear in the High Court, and as stated, advocates may obtain trust accounts. The development where an attorney can now appear in the High Court came into existence some years ago. Usually, on TV, you would see the advocate wearing the black robe and the attorney in the smart suit next to him or her.  

What type of work do advocates do?

  Generally, advocates practice in the Higher Courts of South Africa. Here we refer to the High Courts, Supreme Court of Appeal, and the main one, the Constitutional Court. The Attorney would be the one who would do the groundwork, and if need be, instruct the advocate to attend to the more complicated aspects of the case. For example, the advocate would be drafting pleadings, or affidavits, and attending to arguing the matter before a judge and so on. Not to say the other aspects of litigation are not difficult; the latter items are however best suited for advocates to attend to.  

Do advocates give legal opinions on legal matters?

  Advocates would furthermore also be asked to give their legal opinion on a legal matter. An attorney would usually meet with his or her client and discuss the problem at hand, and thereafter instruct an advocate to give his view on the matter. For example, if a client wants to know the prospects of success in a given legal case. The advocate would then spend time researching the law and finding answers to the legal issue at hand. Here again, this type of work would be best suited for an advocate. [caption id="attachment_8825" align="alignleft" width="159"]Advocate High Court - Gauteng Johannesburg Eastern Cape High Court (Bhisho)
Free State High Court (Bloemfontein)
Western Cape High Court (Cape Town)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
Eastern Cape High Court (Grahamstown)
South Gauteng High Court (Johannesburg)
Northern Cape High Court (Kimberley)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Pietermaritzburg)
Eastern Cape High Court (Port Elizabeth)
North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria)
Limpopo High Court (Thohoyandou)
Eastern Cape High Court (Mthatha)
North West High Court, Mafikeng (Mmabatho) and
Polokwane Circuit Court of the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria[/caption]

Where are the High Courts in South Africa?

  In South Africa, we have 14 (fourteen) divisions of the High Court. They are as follows  

Eastern Cape High Court (Bhisho)

Free State High Court (Bloemfontein)

Western Cape High Court (Cape Town)

KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)

Eastern Cape High Court (Grahamstown)

South Gauteng High Court (Johannesburg)

Northern Cape High Court (Kimberley)

KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Pietermaritzburg)

Eastern Cape High Court (Port Elizabeth)

North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria)

Limpopo High Court (Thohoyandou)

Eastern Cape High Court (Mthatha)

North West High Court, Mafikeng (Mmabatho) and

Polokwane Circuit Court of the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

There is also circuit court.

 

Do advocates appear in the Magistrate’s Court?

Furthermore, advocates also appear in the lower courts. For example, the Magistrates’ Court, Maintenance Court, Children’s Court and so on. Many times, complicated issues arise in matters that are adjudicated in the Magistrate’s Court. For example, big corporates fighting over an issue that is best suited for the Magistrate’s Court. In those cases, it would be prudent to instruct and advocate with the necessary experience and skills. [caption id="attachment_8830" align="alignleft" width="130"]Advocate High Court - Gauteng Johannesburg Eastern Cape High Court (Bhisho)
Free State High Court (Bloemfontein)
Western Cape High Court (Cape Town)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
Eastern Cape High Court (Grahamstown)
South Gauteng High Court (Johannesburg)
Northern Cape High Court (Kimberley)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Pietermaritzburg)
Eastern Cape High Court (Port Elizabeth)
North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria)
Limpopo High Court (Thohoyandou)
Eastern Cape High Court (Mthatha)
North West High Court, Mafikeng (Mmabatho) and
Polokwane Circuit Court of the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria[/caption]

Do advocates do criminal work?

If there is a criminal matter pending in the High Court, usually an advocate would be briefed to attend to it. However, as stated, some attorneys have rights of appearance in the High Court. Advocates would usually attend to criminal matters in the Magistrates’ Court as well. This would either be District Court matters, or Regional Court matters. As you would have guessed, the High Court would deal with more serious offences.  

We would like to hear from Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf

  We asked advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, a practising advocate of the High Court of South Africa some questions regarding the advocate’s profession. He has over a decade and a half of litigation experience.  

Legal Experience:

Our Lawyer: When were you admitted as an advocate of the High Court of South Africa? Advocate Abduroaf: I was admitted as an advocate of the High Court of South Africa in 2003. It feels like yesterday when the Judge President and Deputy Judge President of the Western Cape High Court admitted me. That time, it was still called the Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division of the High Court. [caption id="attachment_8828" align="alignleft" width="140"]Advocate High Court - Gauteng Johannesburg Eastern Cape High Court (Bhisho)
Free State High Court (Bloemfontein)
Western Cape High Court (Cape Town)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
Eastern Cape High Court (Grahamstown)
South Gauteng High Court (Johannesburg)
Northern Cape High Court (Kimberley)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Pietermaritzburg)
Eastern Cape High Court (Port Elizabeth)
North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria)
Limpopo High Court (Thohoyandou)
Eastern Cape High Court (Mthatha)
North West High Court, Mafikeng (Mmabatho) and
Polokwane Circuit Court of the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria[/caption]

Our Lawyer: What are your academic qualifications

Advocate Abduroaf: I hold an LL.B and an LL.M (Master of Laws), both from the University of the Western Cape. However, to become an advocate, you only require an LL.B.  

Our Lawyer: What do you believe are the qualities required to become an advocate?

Advocate Abduroaf: I think hard work and dedication is the key recipe to be a good advocate. One thing for sure, you cannot be lazy. You will not make it out there if you are.  

Our Lawyer: Is it hard practising as an advocate?

Advocate Abduroaf? Initially, it was very challenging. As you gain more experience, it becomes easier. It’s like anything in life, the more you focus on perfecting it, the easier it gets. There are still times when I am faced with a challenging case. I then dig deep and do my best.   Our Lawyer: How do you cope with being an advocate? Advocate Abduroaf. Firstly, I try to live a balanced life. Focusing on various aspects of life, and not only work. As an advocate, your most valued tool is your mind. If your mind is not sharp, you would be disadvantaged. I, therefore, try to keep fit and live a healthy balanced lifestyle.  

Our Lawyer: Are there cases you do not like to do?

Advocate Abduroaf: I love the law and enjoy practising it. However, there are times when you are faced with challenges. For example, the case that comes to you is in a mess, or your client has a week case, but still wishes to proceed. In such a case, things become challenging as you will most of the time be on the back-foot. [caption id="attachment_8827" align="alignleft" width="121"]Advocate High Court - Gauteng Johannesburg Advocate High Court – Gauteng JohannesburgEastern Cape High Court (Bhisho)
Free State High Court (Bloemfontein)
Western Cape High Court (Cape Town)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
Eastern Cape High Court (Grahamstown)
South Gauteng High Court (Johannesburg)
Northern Cape High Court (Kimberley)
KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Pietermaritzburg)
Eastern Cape High Court (Port Elizabeth)
North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria)
Limpopo High Court (Thohoyandou)
Eastern Cape High Court (Mthatha)
North West High Court, Mafikeng (Mmabatho) and
Polokwane Circuit Court of the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
clients in other cities or provinces?[/caption] Advocate Abduroaf: If the need arises and the client is willing to pay for the additional costs, then I would be happy to attend to matters in courts outside of Cape Town. Depending on where the court is situated, I would either fly down the morning or fly the night before.  

Our Lawyer: Any last words for aspiring advocates out there?

Advocate Abduroaf: Work hard, focus, and keep your head down and don’t look around. The next thing you know, you will be the best out there. Eastern Cape High Court (Bhisho) Free State High Court (Bloemfontein) Western Cape High Court (Cape Town) KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban) Eastern Cape High Court (Grahamstown) South Gauteng High Court (Johannesburg) Northern Cape High Court (Kimberley) KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Pietermaritzburg) Eastern Cape High Court (Port Elizabeth) North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria) Limpopo High Court (Thohoyandou) Eastern Cape High Court (Mthatha) North West High Court, Mafikeng (Mmabatho) and Polokwane Circuit Court of the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria  

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!