Grandparent, Grandchildren, and the Law – Child Custody, Care and Guardianship

The caregiving of minor children is in principle, supposed to be the joint responsibility of both parents. It took two parents to bring the child into this world. However, equal sharing of the responsibilities is not always the case. Often, in a case of separation, responsibilities changes. The child lives primarily with one parent, and the other parent has reasonable contact, or sometimes less or none. In the scenario of reasonable contact, the child is still cared for by both parents, but not equally. Read on more to find out what does Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf say about this topic.

Equal caregiving of children

There are however cases where caregiving is shared equally – where the child lives for one week with the mother and the other with the father. But that becomes sometimes impractical when the parents live far from each other, and have different work schedules etc. If the child attends school closer to one parent’s home, he would have to wake up at different times each week, have different parents assist them with school work etc. However, if it can work, and is in the best interests of the child, it should be implemented.

Rights to third parties to minor children

But what happens when a third party, being a relative or otherwise, wants to have contact, care and guardianship over a minor child while one or both the parents are alive? We are not dealing with the issue of adoption – which is a completely different topic – but with the issue of whether other persons can also have rights to contact to a child. It is, however, safe to say that the parents’ rights of contact, custody and so on, would be limited to a certain extent.

Assignment of rights to grandparents

For the purposes of this article, you may ask yourself: Can grandparents be the caregivers of the child? Is this possible and does the law accommodate for a situation where non-biological parents have such rights? You will see below that the law does indeed allow for such a situation. Considering the title of this legal article, we will explore the scenario where maternal grandparents want to have primary care of a minor child after their daughter passed on in a case of a living father. The law mentioned can be applied to any scenario in which third parties are interested in having such rights assigned to the minor child. You may find the following articles interesting:
  1. The Law Regarding Children – The Children’s Act 38 of 2005
  2. Child born out of wedlock: Mother will not consent to her surname change and to be registered as her biological father. What can I do?
  3. How do I get full custody over my child?
  4. Parental Child Abuse in Custody Cases
  5. Relocate with minor child. Parent Refusing Consent for a Passport
  6. Father being refused contact to his child! What are his rights as a Father?
  7. Father’s Parental Responsibilities and Rights to his Child
  8. Urgent Access to your Children without a Lawyer
  9. Parenting Plans and the Law
  10. What happens in a custody dispute where one parent is mentally ill?
  11. How to win your child custody and access court case – Tips and Tricks

What law do we look at?

Well, first of all, we should always look at what is stated in the Constitution, Act 108 of 1996. The Constitution is supreme law in South Africa. What it says, is that a child’s best interests are of paramount importance in all matters concerning a child. This is something we already know. Then we look at legislation subordinate to the Constitution. In this case, we look at the Children’s Act 38 of 2005. This is where we are going to get our answers from.

The Children’s Act 38 of 2005

The Children’s Act is the main piece of legislation dealing with matters concerning children. Section 2 of the Children’s Act deals with its objective. Reading it would give you some type of understanding regarding the Act. It is quoted as follows: “2     Objects of Act   The objects of this Act are-   (a) to promote the preservation and strengthening of families;   (b) to give effect to the following constitutional rights of children, namely-            (i)     family care or parental care or appropriate alternative care when removed from the family environment;            (ii)     social services;            (iii)     protection from maltreatment, neglect, abuse or degradation; and            (iv)     that the best interests of a child are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child;   (c) to give effect to the Republic’s obligations concerning the well-being of children in terms of international instruments binding on the Republic;   (d) to make provision for structures, services and means for promoting and monitoring the sound physical, psychological, intellectual, emotional and social development of children;   (e) to strengthen and develop community structures which can assist in providing care and protection for children;  (f) to protect children from discrimination, exploitation and any other physical, emotional or moral harm or hazards;  (g) to provide care and protection to children who are in need of care and protection;  (h) to recognise the special needs that children with disabilities may have; and  (i) generally, to promote the protection, development and well-being of children.”  As you can see, the Children’s Act’s object is very extensive, focused solely in the interests of the child. Now let us look at what does it say about the best interests of a child. [caption id="attachment_5104" align="alignleft" width="208"]Family Law Services, Cape Town, Child Maintenance, Custody Divorce Make an Appointment with us Online[/caption] [caption id="attachment_5103" align="alignleft" width="203"]Family Law Services, Cape Town, Child Maintenance, Custody Divorce View our Family Law Services[/caption]

Best interests of a child

So what is meant by: “the child’s best interests”? Let’s go one step further and by detecting this in our legislation. As mentioned earlier, our Constitution also refers to it. Section 9 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 states the following: “9     Best interests of child paramount  In all matters concerning the care, protection and well-being of a child the standard that the child’s best interest is of paramount importance, must be applied.”  Now, there you have it. The law does not look at the interests of the parents or third parties. The law looks at what is best for the child under the circumstances. Now we need to move on to the question this legal article addresses: What does the law say about grandparents or third parties obtaining rights of care, contact and guardianship over a child not born from them? For this, we refer to the Children’s Act. Here it refers to the latter persons as interested persons.

Assignment of contact and care to interested person by order of the court

As third parties do not have any inherent parental responsibilities and rights as parents do; rights are assigned by a Court. Now, what does the law say about assigning rights of contact and care to interested third parties? Here section 23 of the Children’s Act is of assistance. Section 23 is quoted as follows” “23     Assignment of contact and care to interested person by order of court  (1) Any person having an interest in the care, well-being or development of a child may apply to the High Court, a divorce court in divorce matters or the children’s court for an order granting to the applicant, on such conditions as the court may deem necessary-   (a) contact with the child; or   (b) care of the child.   (2) When considering an application contemplated in subsection (1), the court must take into account-   (a) the best interests of the child;   (b) the relationship between the applicant and the child, and any other relevant person and the child;  (c) the degree of commitment that the applicant has shown towards the child;  (d) the extent to which the applicant has contributed towards expenses in connection with the birth and maintenance of the child; and  (e) any other fact that should, in the opinion of the court, be taken into account.  (3) If in the course of the court proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that an application for the adoption of the child has been made by another applicant, the court-  (a) must request a family advocate, social worker or psychologist to furnish it with a report and recommendations as to what is in the best interests of the child; and  (b) may suspend the first-mentioned application on any conditions it may determine. (4) The granting of care or contact to a person in terms of this section does not affect the parental responsibilities and rights that any other person may have in respect of the same child.”  So, there we have it. In short, if you formed part of the child’s life and have an interest in having rights of care and contact – the court may afford you such rights. Therefore, should you divorce the mother of your step child, you may also claim rights of contact to your step-child in the divorce court. Now, what are the potential for rights of guardianship being assigned to third parties and grandparents over minor children? And what is the law state? Here too, the Children’s Act comes to our assistance.

Assignment of guardianship by order of the court

Now that you know that our maternal grandparents referred to in the scenario above or any other interested persons, may be assigned rights of care and contact. Now, let’s move on to the aspect of guardianship. Guardianship would refer to the consent for the application of a passport, leaving the Republic, alienating immovable property and so on in relation to a minor child. In this regard, section 24 of the Children’s Act would be of assistance. This section is quoted as follows: “24     Assignment of guardianship by order of court  (1) Any person having an interest in the care, well-being and development of a child may apply to the High Court for an order granting guardianship of the child to the applicant.  (2) When considering an application contemplated in subsection (1), the court must take into account-  (a) the best interests of the child;  (b) the relationship between the applicant and the child, and any other relevant person and the child; and  (c) any other fact that should, in the opinion of the court, be taken into account.  (3) In the event of a person applying for guardianship of a child that already has a guardian, the applicant must submit reasons as to why the child’s existing guardian is not suitable to have guardianship in respect of the child.” The provisions are self-explanatory. What is interesting to note is that only the High Court can assign rights of guardianship over a minor child. The potential problem in that regard is that it can become inaccessible as not all persons can afford to take matters to the High Court. Looking at section 24 (4) of the Children’s Act, in our scenario above where the grandparents want guardianship, but the father is still alive, they must submit very good reasons as to why the father if he is a guardian, is not suitable to have guardianship in respect of the child. One such reason may be that he is and never was involved in the child’s life.

Final words of maternal grandparents obtaining rights over their grandchildren

As can be seen above, it is possible for a non-parent to be assigned rights of care, contact and guardianship over a minor child. What the Court looks at is what interest you have, and whether your application is in the child’s best interest. Now let us look at what role the High Court play in children matters before we conclude.

The High Court in Children Matters

The High Court is the upper guardian of all minor children within its jurisdiction. Therefore, should a matter concerning a child be brought before it, it would be able to adjudicate the matter and make an order as to what is in the minor child’s best interests. Therefore, seeing that guardianship is such an important aspect in a minor child’s life, one can see why the legislature only afforded the High Court with the power to assign rights of guardianship to interested parties.

What to do if you want to be assigned with rights of care, contact and guardianship to a minor child

If you are an interested party in a minor child’s life and wish to be assigned rights of care, contact and guardianship; it is advised that you speak to a lawyer who is knowledgeable on sections 23 and 24 of the Children’s Act and familiar with Court Applications regarding minor children.

Have a family Law appointment with us

We have an online appointments system which enables you to save valuable time and cut straight to the chase. Therefore, there is no need for you to visit our offices (unless it is best for you to do so, or is your most preferred option). You may set up telephonic or video consultation should you wish to do so. You can, therefore, stay in the office or on the couch in the comfort of your own home when dealing with us. We are are a physical, online, set-up and ready to meet with you. Make your appointment online for a consultation today. If you find any of our articles, free resources and posts interesting, or possibly useful to others, please like and share it on Social Media by clicking on the icons below. Should you require any other legal services and advice, not related to family law, visit Private Legal. [caption id="attachment_5144" align="alignleft" width="183"]Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf - Western Cape High Court - Cape Town Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf – Western Cape High Court – Cape Town[/caption] Or click here for the details of Cape Town Advocate, Muhammad Abduroaf or this advocate link to learn more. Visit our child custody and maintenance site for additional information. Post a family law question on:
  1. Ante-nuptial Contracts
  2. Changing your Matrimonial Property Regime
  3. Child Maintenance / Support
  4. Child Custody / Visitation / Access
         

Grandparent, Grandchildren, and the Law – Child Custody, Care and Guardianship

The caregiving of minor children is in principle, supposed to be the joint responsibility of both parents. It took two parents to bring the child into this world. However, equal sharing of the responsibilities is not always the case. Often, in a case of separation, responsibilities changes. The child lives primarily with one parent, and the other parent has reasonable contact, or sometimes less or none. In the scenario of reasonable contact, the child is still cared for by both parents, but not equally. Read on more to find out what does Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf say about this topic.

Equal caregiving of children

There are however cases where caregiving is shared equally – where the child lives for one week with the mother and the other with the father. But that becomes sometimes impractical when the parents live far from each other, and have different work schedules etc. If the child attends school closer to one parent’s home, he would have to wake up at different times each week, have different parents assist them with school work etc. However, if it can work, and is in the best interests of the child, it should be implemented.

Rights to third parties to minor children

But what happens when a third party, being a relative or otherwise, wants to have contact, care and guardianship over a minor child while one or both the parents are alive? We are not dealing with the issue of adoption – which is a completely different topic – but with the issue of whether other persons can also have rights to contact to a child. It is, however, safe to say that the parents’ rights of contact, custody and so on, would be limited to a certain extent.

Assignment of rights to grandparents

For the purposes of this article, you may ask yourself: Can grandparents be the caregivers of the child? Is this possible and does the law accommodate for a situation where non-biological parents have such rights?

You will see below that the law does indeed allow for such a situation. Considering the title of this legal article, we will explore the scenario where maternal grandparents want to have primary care of a minor child after their daughter passed on in a case of a living father. The law mentioned can be applied to any scenario in which third parties are interested in having such rights assigned to the minor child.

You may find the following articles interesting:

  1. The Law Regarding Children – The Children’s Act 38 of 2005
  2. Child born out of wedlock: Mother will not consent to her surname change and to be registered as her biological father. What can I do?
  3. How do I get full custody over my child?
  4. Parental Child Abuse in Custody Cases
  5. Relocate with minor child. Parent Refusing Consent for a Passport
  6. Father being refused contact to his child! What are his rights as a Father?
  7. Father’s Parental Responsibilities and Rights to his Child
  8. Urgent Access to your Children without a Lawyer
  9. Parenting Plans and the Law
  10. What happens in a custody dispute where one parent is mentally ill?
  11. How to win your child custody and access court case – Tips and Tricks

What law do we look at?

Well, first of all, we should always look at what is stated in the Constitution, Act 108 of 1996. The Constitution is supreme law in South Africa. What it says, is that a child’s best interests are of paramount importance in all matters concerning a child. This is something we already know. Then we look at legislation subordinate to the Constitution. In this case, we look at the Children’s Act 38 of 2005. This is where we are going to get our answers from.

The Children’s Act 38 of 2005

The Children’s Act is the main piece of legislation dealing with matters concerning children. Section 2 of the Children’s Act deals with its objective. Reading it would give you some type of understanding regarding the Act. It is quoted as follows:

“2     Objects of Act 

 The objects of this Act are- 

 (a) to promote the preservation and strengthening of families; 

 (b) to give effect to the following constitutional rights of children, namely- 

          (i)     family care or parental care or appropriate alternative care when removed from the family environment; 

          (ii)     social services; 

          (iii)     protection from maltreatment, neglect, abuse or degradation; and 

          (iv)     that the best interests of a child are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child; 

 (c) to give effect to the Republic’s obligations concerning the well-being of children in terms of international instruments binding on the Republic; 

 (d) to make provision for structures, services and means for promoting and monitoring the sound physical, psychological, intellectual, emotional and social development of children; 

 (e) to strengthen and develop community structures which can assist in providing care and protection for children; 

(f) to protect children from discrimination, exploitation and any other physical, emotional or moral harm or hazards; 

(g) to provide care and protection to children who are in need of care and protection; 

(h) to recognise the special needs that children with disabilities may have; and 

(i) generally, to promote the protection, development and well-being of children.” 

As you can see, the Children’s Act’s object is very extensive, focused solely in the interests of the child. Now let us look at what does it say about the best interests of a child.

Family Law Services, Cape Town, Child Maintenance, Custody Divorce
Make an Appointment with us Online
Family Law Services, Cape Town, Child Maintenance, Custody Divorce
View our Family Law Services

Best interests of a child

So what is meant by: “the child’s best interests”? Let’s go one step further and by detecting this in our legislation. As mentioned earlier, our Constitution also refers to it. Section 9 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 states the following:

“9     Best interests of child paramount 

In all matters concerning the care, protection and well-being of a child the standard that the child’s best interest is of paramount importance, must be applied.” 

Now, there you have it. The law does not look at the interests of the parents or third parties. The law looks at what is best for the child under the circumstances. Now we need to move on to the question this legal article addresses: What does the law say about grandparents or third parties obtaining rights of care, contact and guardianship over a child not born from them? For this, we refer to the Children’s Act. Here it refers to the latter persons as interested persons.

Assignment of contact and care to interested person by order of the court

As third parties do not have any inherent parental responsibilities and rights as parents do; rights are assigned by a Court. Now, what does the law say about assigning rights of contact and care to interested third parties? Here section 23 of the Children’s Act is of assistance. Section 23 is quoted as follows”

“23     Assignment of contact and care to interested person by order of court 

(1) Any person having an interest in the care, well-being or development of a child may apply to the High Court, a divorce court in divorce matters or the children’s court for an order granting to the applicant, on such conditions as the court may deem necessary- 

 (a) contact with the child; or 

 (b) care of the child. 

 (2) When considering an application contemplated in subsection (1), the court must take into account- 

 (a) the best interests of the child; 

 (b) the relationship between the applicant and the child, and any other relevant person and the child; 

(c) the degree of commitment that the applicant has shown towards the child; 

(d) the extent to which the applicant has contributed towards expenses in connection with the birth and maintenance of the child; and 

(e) any other fact that should, in the opinion of the court, be taken into account. 

(3) If in the course of the court proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that an application for the adoption of the child has been made by another applicant, the court- 

(a) must request a family advocate, social worker or psychologist to furnish it with a report and recommendations as to what is in the best interests of the child; and 

(b) may suspend the first-mentioned application on any conditions it may determine.

(4) The granting of care or contact to a person in terms of this section does not affect the parental responsibilities and rights that any other person may have in respect of the same child.” 

So, there we have it. In short, if you formed part of the child’s life and have an interest in having rights of care and contact – the court may afford you such rights. Therefore, should you divorce the mother of your step child, you may also claim rights of contact to your step-child in the divorce court. Now, what are the potential for rights of guardianship being assigned to third parties and grandparents over minor children? And what is the law state? Here too, the Children’s Act comes to our assistance.

Assignment of guardianship by order of the court

Now that you know that our maternal grandparents referred to in the scenario above or any other interested persons, may be assigned rights of care and contact. Now, let’s move on to the aspect of guardianship. Guardianship would refer to the consent for the application of a passport, leaving the Republic, alienating immovable property and so on in relation to a minor child. In this regard, section 24 of the Children’s Act would be of assistance. This section is quoted as follows:

24     Assignment of guardianship by order of court 

(1) Any person having an interest in the care, well-being and development of a child may apply to the High Court for an order granting guardianship of the child to the applicant. 

(2) When considering an application contemplated in subsection (1), the court must take into account- 

(a) the best interests of the child; 

(b) the relationship between the applicant and the child, and any other relevant person and the child; and 

(c) any other fact that should, in the opinion of the court, be taken into account. 

(3) In the event of a person applying for guardianship of a child that already has a guardian, the applicant must submit reasons as to why the child’s existing guardian is not suitable to have guardianship in respect of the child.”

The provisions are self-explanatory. What is interesting to note is that only the High Court can assign rights of guardianship over a minor child. The potential problem in that regard is that it can become inaccessible as not all persons can afford to take matters to the High Court.

Looking at section 24 (4) of the Children’s Act, in our scenario above where the grandparents want guardianship, but the father is still alive, they must submit very good reasons as to why the father if he is a guardian, is not suitable to have guardianship in respect of the child. One such reason may be that he is and never was involved in the child’s life.

Final words of maternal grandparents obtaining rights over their grandchildren

As can be seen above, it is possible for a non-parent to be assigned rights of care, contact and guardianship over a minor child. What the Court looks at is what interest you have, and whether your application is in the child’s best interest. Now let us look at what role the High Court play in children matters before we conclude.

The High Court in Children Matters

The High Court is the upper guardian of all minor children within its jurisdiction. Therefore, should a matter concerning a child be brought before it, it would be able to adjudicate the matter and make an order as to what is in the minor child’s best interests. Therefore, seeing that guardianship is such an important aspect in a minor child’s life, one can see why the legislature only afforded the High Court with the power to assign rights of guardianship to interested parties.

What to do if you want to be assigned with rights of care, contact and guardianship to a minor child

If you are an interested party in a minor child’s life and wish to be assigned rights of care, contact and guardianship; it is advised that you speak to a lawyer who is knowledgeable on sections 23 and 24 of the Children’s Act and familiar with Court Applications regarding minor children.

Have a family Law appointment with us

We have an online appointments system which enables you to save valuable time and cut straight to the chase. Therefore, there is no need for you to visit our offices (unless it is best for you to do so, or is your most preferred option).
You may set up telephonic or video consultation should you wish to do so. You can, therefore, stay in the office or on the couch in the comfort of your own home when dealing with us. We are are a physical, online, set-up and ready to meet with you. Make your appointment online for a consultation today.

If you find any of our articles, free resources and posts interesting, or possibly useful to others, please like and share it on Social Media by clicking on the icons below. Should you require any other legal services and advice, not related to family law, visit Private Legal.

Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf - Western Cape High Court - Cape Town
Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf – Western Cape High Court – Cape Town

Or click here for the details of Cape Town Advocate, Muhammad Abduroaf or this advocate link to learn more.

Visit our child custody and maintenance site for additional information.

Post a family law question on:

  1. Ante-nuptial Contracts
  2. Changing your Matrimonial Property Regime
  3. Child Maintenance / Support
  4. Child Custody / Visitation / Access

 

 

 

 

 

Related Post

I am in search of a trustworthy attorney or advocate. Please direct me to reputable sources to find one.

There are many reputable sources for legal advice and services. Some options include consulting with an advocate or attorney, reaching out to a legal aid organisation, or searching for legal resources through your various websites. It’s essential to research and choose a reliable source to ensure that you receive accurate and trustworthy legal guidance, advice or representation.

When do I decide that there is a need to consult with a lawyer, attorney, or advocate?

Consider consulting with a lawyer, attorney, or advocate if you are facing a legal issue or have questions you need help with. Some everyday situations where you may want to consult a lawyer include:  1. You have been arrested or charged with a crime;  2. You are facing a civil lawsuit or have been served with legal papers.  3. You are considering filing for divorce or dealing with a child custody issue.  4. You are starting a business or need help with business contracts.  5. You are buying or selling a home or other real estate property.  6. You are facing an employment dispute or have questions about your rights as an employee.  A lawyer can provide guidance and support throughout the legal process, ensure that your rights are protected, and help you achieve the best possible outcome in your case. I think it’s essential to choose a lawyer with experience in law that pertains to your specific issue and who you feel comfortable working with.

Is it better to consult with an attorney or advocate virtually or in person?

Whether it is better to consult with a lawyer virtually or in person depends on your preferences and the nature of your legal issue.  Virtual consultations, such as video or phone consultations, can be a convenient option for individuals who cannot travel to a lawyer’s office or prefer the flexibility of consulting with a lawyer from the comfort of their home. Virtual consultations can also benefit individuals with time constraints or who need to consult with a lawyer quickly. However, in-person consultations may be preferable for individuals who prefer face-to-face interaction and feel more comfortable discussing sensitive legal issues. In-person consultations can also allow for a more thorough and detailed discussion of your legal issue and the opportunity to review and sign legal documents on the spot. Ultimately, the decision to consult with a lawyer, attorney or advocate virtually or in person is a personal one and depends on your individual needs and preferences. Many lawyers offer virtual and in-person consultations, so it’s important to discuss your options with your lawyer and choose the best option.

What is free legal advice by an attorney or advocate?

Free legal advice refers to providing legal guidance or information without charge or cost to the recipient. This may be provided by legal aid organisations, pro bono attorneys or advocates, or other resources that offer free legal services. Free legal advice can be helpful for individuals who are unable to afford the cost of hiring an attorney or advocate. Still, ensuring that the advice received is accurate and reliable is essential. Free legal advice may only sometimes be able to address complex legal issues or provide ongoing legal representation fully.

Are all advocates and attorneys the same?

No, not all lawyers are the same. While the High Court has admitted all advocates and attorneys, they may specialise in different areas of law and have varying levels of experience and expertise. Some lawyers may focus on criminal law, while others specialise in family law, intellectual property law, or other areas. Additionally, lawyers may work in private practice, government agencies, or non-profit organisations, impacting their practice and areas of expertise. I think choosing a lawyer with experience in law is essential.

Is there a guarantee that I will win my court case with a lawyer?

No, there is no guarantee that you will win your court case. The outcome of a court case depends on various factors, including the strength of the evidence, the arguments presented by each side, the judge’s interpretation of the law, and other factors. While a lawyer can provide guidance and help prepare your case, they cannot guarantee a specific outcome. It’s essential to have realistic expectations, be prepared for the possibility of an unfavourable outcome, and plan how to proceed if this occurs.

How often should I consult with my attorney or advocate?

The frequency with which you should consult with your lawyer depends on the nature of your legal issue and the complexity of your case. In some cases, you may only need to consult with your lawyer once or twice throughout the entire legal process, while in other cases, you may need to communicate with them more frequently. It’s essential to set clear expectations with your lawyer regarding communication and ensure you are both on the same page regarding how often you will check in and what type of updates you can expect. Also, please feel free to ask me any questions or concerns during the legal process. In that case, reaching out to your lawyer as soon as possible would be essential to ensure they can address them effectively.

What do I do if I am not happy with the outcome of the court case?

If you are not happy with the outcome of your court case, several options may be available to you, depending on the circumstances of your case.  Firstly, you may have the option to file an appeal, which is a formal request for a higher court to review the decision made in your case. You would appeal to the High Court if your matter were heard in the Magistrates  Court. An appeal can only be filed if there were errors in the legal process that may have affected the outcome of your case, such as the application of the wrong law, facts, procedural errors and so on. Additionally, suppose that your lawyer provided inadequate representation or made significant errors that may have impacted the outcome of your case. In that case, you may have the option to file a complaint or a malpractice claim against them.  I think consulting with a lawyer is essential to determine the best course of action in your specific case. They can guide your legal options and help you make an informed decision about how to proceed.

Best Attorneys, Advocates, and lawyers to assist you in your Court Custody matter. When is the best time to get them involved in your case?

When dealing with a family law matter, it is essential that you obtain the best legal advice possible. And in this regard, the best attorney, lawyer, or advocate for you. Not necessarily the most expensive or experienced. This is so as we are dealing with your children, that require the best care and protection. Child custody, child guardianship, visitation and care are all interrelated. However, they all have one underlying principle: the child’s best interests. If parents cannot agree on what is in the child’s best interest, Attorneys, Advocates, lawyers, and the Court may get involved. Your legal representative needs to be on the same page as you.

What do child custody, child guardianship, visitation and care relate to?

The terms child custody, child guardianship, visitation and care relate to a child’s life in relation to a parent, caregiver or interested party. However, if you are a caregiver, your conduct would directly affect various aspects of the minor child’s life. These include daily care, education, medical treatment, and overseas visits. This article attempts to address how the law expects parents to exercise their parental responsibilities and rights concerning their minor children and what they should do if there are issues. If you have a legal problem relating to child custody, child guardianship, visitation, and care, it may be best to consult with a lawyer, attorney, or advocate.

The law focuses on what is best for the child.

Often parents would fight over what parental responsibilities and rights they wish to exercise concerning a child. That would be the conduct of separated parents, divorced parents or parents who share no history but for having a child together. What often happens is that parents focus on what is best for them and not what is best for the child involved. That is unfortunate as they navigate parental responsibilities and rights with the wrong tools. As stated, they need to focus on what is in the child’s best interests. That is so, as the court that makes the final decision follows the best interests of the child principle.

Examples of when a child’s view may be disregarded

It may, however, happen that what is best for the parent may also be best for the child. However, that would not always be the case. It would, however, be the case by chance. For example, a parent may want to have primary care of the minor child because it means they would not have to travel far to see the child. It would be convenient for the parent. But luckily for the parent, the child’s school is close to that parent’s home. Therefore, it would be in the minor child’s best interests to be cared for by that parent. In this scenario, should a court have to adjudicate over this matter, its reasons for allowing the latter parent to care for the minor child primarily is based on what is best for the child (the location of the school) and not what is best for the parent (less travel). However, the outcome would be different if the school was central to both parents’ homes in the same example. The other parent may argue that they may have more time to care for the minor child and assist in homework, extramural activities, etc. In that case, that parent would have a better chance of obtaining primary care.

What about what the child has to say?

In our law, we are expected to consider what the child has to say about a situation or decision involving them. Here we are referring to a child custody matter. This principle does not apply to all children, and it would depend on the age and maturity of the child involved. For example, a child who is 14 years old would be mature enough to provide input. However, we cannot place too much weight on the wants of a three-year-old child who is not even school-going. However, the three-year-old child’s familiarity with the parent and fondness would play a role. Having said the above, it is essential to note that the law does not blindly follow what the child wants, which would be absurd. What is expected is for one to listen to the child, see their reasons, and consider that in relation to the facts of the matter. This includes what the parents have to say. For example, if the child says they want to live with the father because each second weekend, they go to KFC, and the beach and have fun, and at Mom, it is always homework, a healthy diet, and chores, the child’s reasoning is not sound. One would also need to consider whether a parent can care for a child. It would be senseless to place a child in the care of a parent who is rich, works seven days a week and has a handful of nannies to care for the child, despite the other parent working from home and having a lot of time for the child.

When do I fight for parental responsibilities and rights over my minor child?

If in an unfortunate situation where the parents cannot agree on caring for the child, then it is advised they receive professional help. That may not be seeking legal advice from the word go, and it may be meeting with a social worker or a mediator first. If things are getting out of hand, it may be best to consider seeing an attorney, advocate, or lawyer to assist you in your matter.

What Court would be approached in a Child Custody dispute?

There are three possibilities for the Court you may approach in a Child Custody dispute. They are the divorce court in a divorce matter, the Children’s Court, and the High Court. The divorce court will be the appropriate forum if there is a pending divorce. But not always. If you wish to represent yourself, then the Children’s Court is your best option. If you can afford legal representation, your attorney, lawyer, or advocate will advise you whether to approach the High Court.

Best advice on the way forward when it comes to attorneys, advocates, and lawyers

The best advice we have when it comes to attorneys, advocates, and lawyers in child custody matters is that you make use of the one you can work with. It is not ideal to use the most experienced attorney or advocate when he or she is swamped and has no time for your case. [caption id="attachment_10745" align="alignnone" width="300"]Best Attorneys, Advocates, lawyers to assist you in your Court Custody matter. When is the best time to get them involved in your case? Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf – Trust Account Advocate[/caption]

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!