Gender-Based Violence (GBV) in South Africa –  What are your legal remedies? – Video of Webinar that took place 28 August 2020 and hosted by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf

Gender-Based Violence is a real and serious problem in South Africa. A lot has been written on the topic, and the problem is ongoing.  Our Lawyer’s stance on this issue is that it should be eradicated. This would require the active input of government, the victims and the community. We wanted to continue with the conversation regarding Gender-Based Violence. We, therefore, invited those who have been affected thereby to partake in a Webinar entitled, “Gender-based Violence in South Africa – What are your legal remedies? Our Lawyer had a successful live webinar on this serious topic, whereby victims spoke out.  The webinar will be hosted by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf. The video can be watched below.    
Posted on by Telelaw

Gender-Based Violence (GBV) in South Africa –  What are your legal remedies? – Video of Webinar that took place 28 August 2020 and hosted by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf

Gender-Based Violence is a real and serious problem in South Africa. A lot has been written on the topic, and the problem is ongoing.  Our Lawyer’s stance on this issue is that it should be eradicated. This would require the active input of government, the victims and the community.

We wanted to continue with the conversation regarding Gender-Based Violence. We, therefore, invited those who have been affected thereby to partake in a Webinar entitled, “Gender-based Violence in South Africa – What are your legal remedies?

Our Lawyer had a successful live webinar on this serious topic, whereby victims spoke out.  The webinar will be hosted by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf. The video can be watched below.

 

 

Related Post

Can a parent appeal a child custody order granted by the High Court or Children’s Court?

In resolving disputes regarding child custody or guardianship (parental rights and responsibilities) matters, a court will usually be approached. The court is also the upper guardian of all minor children within its area of jurisdiction. A parent or interested party may approach the Children’s Court or the High Court when it comes to parental rights regarding a minor child. The High Court, however, has greater jurisdiction when it relates to issues associated with guardianship rights. As demonstrated below, the courts’ decisions may be reviewed by a higher court. However, before approaching the court, the parties should first try to resolve the matter through entering into a parenting plan.

How are child custody court proceedings initiated?

A parent or interested party would make an application to the court. In the High Court, this would be done with a Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit, served on the other parent or interested party. An interested party would be someone who cares for the child or significantly forms part of the child’s life. For example, a step-parent, grandparent, or aunt. Once the founding papers are served, the other party, the Respondent, would file their answering papers. Thereafter, the Applicant would reply. This is how evidence is provided in the High Court as stated. The process is different in the Children’s Court. In the Children’s Court, forms with supporting documents initiate the process.

What happens at the High Court or Children’s Court?

Once the latter initial processes are done, and all other court processes are followed, the parties would present their cases to the presiding officer. At the end of the matter, the court (the Judge or Magistrate) would give the judgement (ruling) or order. This judgement or order will be based upon all the evidence and arguments presented to it by the relevant parties. There may also be expert reports that were considered. For example, a report of the Office of the Family Advocate, a social worker or private psychologist appointed in the matter. These expert reports are very useful as the court seldom meets with the parties. The experts would interview the parents, children and other interested parties and provide their expert recommendations.

How does the court make its decision regarding parental rights and responsibilities?

After considering all the evidence presented by the parties and experts, the court will have to decide whether or not to grant the relief sought in the Application before it. The court will be guided by the underlining principle of what is best for the minor child and its experiences with regard to the type of matter before it. The court cannot act on emotion or pity. For example, feel sorry for the mother or father. Their decisions must be judicially exercised. Therefore, there would be no merit to state that the Court always finds in favour of a single mother, or a father. Each case would be decided on its own merits.

What happens after the child custody order is granted?

Now, once the court decides was best for the minor child, the court would impose an order. The order may say, for example, that the minor child should reside primarily with one parent, or an interested party, who is not a parent. Or the dispute may be regarding guardianship rights. For example, the court may make an order that both parties’ consent is not required for a passport application of a minor child. No matter what the order is, it must be adhered to by all the parties concerned.

Can the child custody court’s decision be challenged?

Now after the court heard all the evidence presented and arguments by either party and handed down its judgment and order; does this mean that its decision cannot be challenged? The answer is no. An aggrieved party may appeal the judgement. In other words, the party who is not happy with the presiding officer’s decision may approach a higher Court to revisit the matter. The higher Court would have to decide whether or not the court made the correct decision. For example, if a parent is not happy with the High Court’s decision that custody should be afforded to the grandmother; then either parent may appeal that decision.

When is it advisable to appeal?

Before a party decides to appeal a judgement or order of a court, he or she will have to ensure that there are good grounds to appeal it. In other words, the party who wishes to appeal the judgement must be able to show that the Judge misdirected himself or herself and did not apply his or her mind properly. Furthermore, had the presiding officer applied his mind correctly, a different decision would have been reached.

Practical Example of when an appeal may be appropriate

A practical example would be where all the child care experts in the matter agree that the minor child should reside with the father; but notwithstanding what the experts recommend, the court nonetheless ordered that the minor child should reside with the mother. In such a case, it would make sense to appeal the judgement, as all evidence before the court showed that the minor child should primarily reside with the father and not with the mother. On the face of it, it is clear that the judge made an error. The case should, therefore, be relooked at.

Judge’s Reason

On the other hand, the court could have had good reasons why it ordered that the minor child should primarily reside with the mother. One reason could be that the experts who recommended primary care misdirected themselves. They considered not so important factors in granting primary care. For example, the father’s wealth and his string of domestic workers at his home. In other words, they recommended custody to a parent due to him being very wealthy and can afford the best for the child. In the court’s view, the wealthy parent should then pay more child maintenance to the other parent. The mother, in this case, is better suited to care for the child, as she did since birth. The father, although very wealthy, is most of the time working overseas and unable to personally care for the child.

Know the time periods allowed should you wish to appeal a judgment

If you have valid and good grounds for an appeal, then such an appeal should be made. A later article may deal with the specific rules of court and law that relates to an appeal. The purpose of this article is to bring to the reader’s attention that you may challenge an order that relates to parental rights and responsibilities in relation to a minor child. Please note that the rules and laws regarding appeals are very strict and technical. A party would have to comply with certain time requirements before proceeding with the appeal. Therefore, should a party wish to appeal a judgement, he or she should act upon it timeously as provided for in the relevant rules of court. We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws  
Posted on by Telelaw

Senior family law expert giving the best simple advice on International Relocation of minor children – Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf

International Relocation matters concerning minor children is one category of our law that requires more attention than other categories of family law. If you intend to relocate overseas with your minor child or do not want your minor child to relocate with the other parent, this article is for you. Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf is a senior family law expert with over twenty years of experience in Family law. He runs a Law Firm styled Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf in Cape Town. He is a Trust Account Advocate. What this means, he takes on work from members of the public directly. Other advocates need to be instructed by an attorney to act in your case.

When does the relocation of minor children disputes arise?

The starting point is that parents and their children live in South Africa. A parent, usually the primary caregiver, wants to relocate with the minor child to another country. For this example, we will assume both parents are co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights of guardianship over the specific minor child. For the minor child to leave the Republic of South Africa and relocate with the other parent overseas, the guardianship consent of the parent remaining in South Africa would be required. This is a requirement as provided for in section 18 of the Children’s Act. A dispute arises if the parent remaining in South Africa does not consent to the relocation of the minor child to a different country. This is so as, without a court order stating otherwise, the minor child would not be allowed to relocate overseas.

When should a parent approach the Court in an international relocation matter involving a minor child?

In principle, anyone can approach a court for any matter. However, not everyone would be successful in their case. Therefore, before you approach the Court for consent for the minor child to relocate with you to a different country, you must make sure you have a strong case. On the other hand, if you are a parent whose consent is required and do not want to provide it, you must ensure you have a reason for refusing it. If, however, you do have a strong case, as we would explain further below, for the relocation, then in that case, you should approach the Court.

The best interests of the child’s principle

Both the South African Constitution and the Children’s Act clearly state that a child’s best interests are the most critical factor when it comes to it. In other words, not the best interests of the parents, but the best interests of the child. However, there are cases where upholding the interests of a parent would be in the minor child’s best interests. For example, a much better job offer. In relocation matters, if the parents cannot agree on the relocation of the minor child, then the Court would intervene and only direct that the relocation is authorised if it is of the view that it would be in the minor child’s best interests.

What do I present to the Court regarding international relocation matters?

According to Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, the reason why people relocate is vast. For most, it is for work or a better life; for others, it is related to going back home or living with a spouse or a loved one. However, that is the reason why the parents want to relocate. Whatever the reason, you need to demonstrate that the minor child would not be in a worse position after the relocation. Therefore, you would have to demonstrate that there would be adequate housing, food, education, medical services and so on after the relocation. In other words, the minor child would not be neglected and would have a good life with his or her primary caregiver.

What can I do if I do not want the relocation to take place?

It is scarce where the non-primary caregiver wants to relocate with the minor child. However, given the correct facts and circumstances, it is possible. In this example, the primary caregiver wants to relocate with the minor child, and the parent remaining behind does not want to consent. That parent must show that it would not be in the minor child’s best interests to relocate. The parent may even go as far as to show that they can care well enough for the minor child in South Africa and that the de facto primary caregiver is welcome to relocate without the minor child.

When do I approach the Court?

As already alluded to above, if the parents cannot come to an agreement regarding the relocation of the minor child to a different country, then in that case, the Court should be approached. It is best to make use of an experienced family lawyer (attorney or Trust Account Advocate). Both parents would provide information in the form of affidavits to the Court as to reasons for the relocation and/or the refusal thereof. In many cases, the Court would appoint the Office of the Family to get involved and do an investigation as to what is in the minor child’s best interests. The Court would then make a ruling on the relocation of the minor child to a foreign country.      

Posted on by Telelaw

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!