Best Divorce Lawyer Somerset West Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf Cape Town
Related Post
Divorce Lawyer
Posted on by Telelaw
ABC Steps to Appealing to the Constitutional Court of South Africa
If you are unhappy with a Court’s decision, you have a right to take the decision on appeal. Section 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996) states: This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic; law or conduct inconsistent with it is invalid, and the obligations imposed by it must be fulfilled. Therefore, any act of parliament (e.g. Legislation) or decision of the government must be in conformity with the rights and obligations entrenched in our Constitution. In South Africa, we have the Constitutional Court. This is stated in Section 166 of our Constitution. Section 167 of the Constitution, with its subsections, states the following:- The Constitutional Court consists of the Chief Justice of South Africa, the Deputy Chief Justice and nine other judges.
- A matter before the Constitutional Court must be heard by at least eight judges.
- The Constitutional Court
- is the highest court of the Republic; and
- may decide
- constitutional matters; and
- any other matter, if the Constitutional Court grants leave to appeal on the grounds that the matter raises an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by that Court; and
- makes the final decision whether a matter is within its jurisdiction.
- Only the Constitutional Court may
- decide disputes between organs of state in the national or provincial sphere concerning the constitutional status, powers or functions of any of those organs of state;
- decide on the constitutionality of any parliamentary or provincial Bill, but may do so only in the circumstances anticipated in section 79 or 121;
- decide applications envisaged in section 80 or 122;
- decide on the constitutionality of any amendment to the Constitution;
- decide that Parliament or the President has failed to fulfil a constitutional obligation; or
- certify a provincial constitution in terms of section 144.
- The Constitutional Court makes the final decision whether an Act of Parliament, a provincial Act or conduct of the President is constitutional, and must confirm any order of invalidity made by the Supreme Court of Appeal, the High Court if South Afirca, or a court of similar status, before that order has any force.
- National legislation or the rules of the Constitutional Court must allow a person, when it is in the interests of justice and with leave of the Constitutional Court
- to bring a matter directly to the Constitutional Court; or
- to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court from any other court.
- A constitutional matter includes any issue involving the interpretation, protection or enforcement of the Constitution.
Therefore, if you want to challenge a court’s decision on a Constitutional basis, the highest court you can go to is the Constitutional Court.How do I take a matter to the Constitutional Court?
The Constitutional Court has its own rules. Therein, you would find the procedure to follow when bringing a matter to the Constitutional Court. Constitutional Court Rule 19 deals with Appeals. It states the following:- Appeals
(1) The procedure set out in this rule shall be followed in an application for leave to appeal to the Court where a decision on a constitutional matter, other than an order of constitutional invalidity under section 172(2)(a) of the Constitution, has been given by any court including the Supreme Court of Appeal, and irrespective of whether the President has refused leave or special leave to appeal. (2) A litigant who is aggrieved by the decision of a court and who wishes to appeal against it directly to the Court on a constitutional matter shall, within 15 days of the order against which the appeal is sought to be brought and after giving notice to the other party or parties concerned, lodge with the Registrar an application for leave to appeal: Provided that where the President has refused leave to appeal the period prescribed in this rule shall run from the date of the order refusing leave. (3) An application referred to in subrule (2) shall be signed by the applicant or his or her legal representative and shall contain— (a) the decision against which the appeal is brought and the grounds upon which such decision is disputed; (b) a statement setting out clearly and succinctly the constitutional matter raised in the decision; and any other issues including issues that are alleged to be connected with a decision on the constitutional matter; (c) such supplementary information or argument as the applicant considers necessary to bring to the attention of the Court; and (d) a statement indicating whether the applicant has applied or intends to apply for leave or special leave to appeal to any other court, and if so— (i) which court; (ii) whether such application is conditional upon the application to the Court being refused; and (iii) the outcome of such application, if known at the time of the application to the Court. (4) (a) Within 10 days from the date upon which an application referred to in subrule (2) is lodged, the respondent or respondents may respond thereto in writing, indicating whether or not the application for leave to appeal is being opposed, and if so the grounds for such opposition. (b) The response shall be signed by the respondent or respondents or his or her or their legal representative. (5) (a) A respondent or respondents wishing to lodge a cross-appeal to the Court on a constitutional matter shall, within 10 days from the date upon which an application in subrule (2) is lodged, lodge with the Registrar an application for leave to cross-appeal. (b) The provisions of these rules with regard to appeals shall apply, with necessary modifications, to cross-appeals. (6) (a) The Court shall decide whether or not to grant the appellant leave to appeal. (b) Applications for leave to appeal may be dealt with summarily, without receiving oral or written argument other than that contained in the application itself. (c) The Court may order that the application for leave to appeal be set down for argument and direct that the written argument of the parties deal not only with the question whether the application for leave to appeal should be granted, but also with the merits of the dispute. The provisions of rule 20 shall, with necessary modifications, apply to the procedure to be followed in such procedures. As you would note, you should first obtain leave to appeal. Once that has been granted, you can then go ahead with the next steps.What is the procedure once leave to appeal has been granted?
Rule 20 of the Constitutional Court Rules deals with the Procedure on Appeal. It states:- Procedure on appeal
(1) If leave to appeal is given in terms of rule 19, the appellant shall note and prosecute the appeal as follows— (a) The appellant shall prepare and lodge the appeal record with the Registrar within such time as may be fixed by the Chief Justice in directions. (b) Subject to the provisions of subrule (1)(c) below, the appeal record shall consist of the judgment of the court from which the appeal is noted, together with all the documentation lodged by the parties in that court and all the evidence which may have been led in the proceedings and which may be relevant to the issues that are to be determined. (c) (i) The parties shall endeavour to reach agreement on what should be included in the record and, in the absence of such agreement, the appellant shall apply to the Chief Justice for directions to be given in regard to the compilation of the record. (ii) Such application shall be made in writing and shall set out the nature of the dispute between the parties in regard to the compilation of the record and the reasons for the appellant’s contentions. (iii) The respondent may respond to the application within 10 days of being served with the application and shall set out the reasons for the respondent’s contentions. (iv) The Chief Justice may assign the application to one or more judges, who may deal with the matter on the papers or require the parties to appear before him or her or them on a specified day and at a specified time to debate the compilation of the record. (v) The judge or judges concerned shall give directions in regard to the compilation of the record, the time within which the record is to be lodged with the Registrar and any other matters which may be deemed by him or her or them to be necessary for the purpose of enabling the Court to deal with the appeal, which directions may include that the matter be referred back to the court a quo for the hearing of additional evidence specified in the directions, or that additional evidence be put before the Court by way of affidavit or otherwise for the purpose of the appeal. (2) (a) One of the copies of the record lodged with the Registrar shall be certified as correct by the Registrar of the court appealed from. (b) Copies of the record shall be clearly typed on stout A4-size paper, double-spaced in black record ink, on one side of the paper only. (c) Legible documents that were typed or printed in their original form such as cheques and the like shall not be retyped and clear photocopies on A4-size paper shall be provided instead. (d) The pages shall be numbered clearly and consecutively and every tenth line on each page shall be numbered and the pagination used in the court a quo shall be retained where possible. (e) Bulky records shall be divided into separate conveniently-sized volumes of approximately 100 pages each. The record shall be securely bound in book format to withstand constant use and shall be so bound that upon being used will lie open without manual or other restraint. (f) All records shall be securely bound in suitable covers disclosing the case number, names of the parties, the volume number and the numbers of the pages contained in that volume, the total number of volumes, the court a quo and the names of the attorneys of the parties. (g) The binding required by this rule shall be sufficiently secure to ensure the stability of the papers contained within the volume; and where the record consists of more than one volume, the number of each volume and the number of the pages contained in a volume shall appear on the upper third of the spine of the volume. (h) Where documents are lodged with the Registrar, and such documents are recorded on a computer disk, the party lodging the document shall where possible also make available to the Registrar a disk containing the file in which the document is contained, or transmit an electronic copy of the document concerned by e-mail in a format determined by the Registrar which is compatible with software that is used by the Court at the time of lodgement, to the Registrar at: [email protected]: Provided that the transmission of such copy shall not relieve the party concerned from the obligation under rule 1(3) to lodge the prescribed number of hard copies of the documents so lodged. (i) If a disk is made available to the Registrar the file will be copied and the disk will be returned to the party concerned. Where a disk or an electronic copy of a document other than a record is provided, the party need lodge only 13 copies of the document concerned with the Registrar. (3) If a record has been lodged in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of subrule (1), the Registrar shall cause a notice to be given to the parties to the appeal requiring— (a) the appellant to lodge with the Registrar written argument in support of the appeal within a period determined by the Chief Justice and specified in such notice; and (b) the respondent to lodge with the Registrar written argument in reply to the appellant’s argument by a specified date determined by the Chief Justice, which shall be subsequent to the date on which the appellant’s argument was served on the respondent. (4) The appellant may lodge with the Registrar written argument in answer to the respondent’s argument within 10 days from the date on which the respondent’s argument was served on the appellant. (5) The Chief Justice may decide whether the appeal shall be dealt with on the basis of written arguments only. (6) Subject to the provisions of subrule (5), the Chief Justice shall determine the date on which oral argument will be heard, and the Registrar shall within five days of such determination notify all parties to the appeal of the date of the hearing by registered post or facsimile.What are the Steps in Summary:
- Within 15 days of the Order you are appealing against, lodged you Application for leave to appeal [Rule 19(2)]
- Within 10 days, the Respondent is to file its Notice to Oppose the appeal and the grounds for the opposition [Rule 19(4)(a)]
- The Constitutional Court would then decide whether or not to grant the leave to Appeal [Rule 19(6)(a)]
- If leave to appeal is granted, the appellant shall prepare and lodge the appeal record with the Registrar [Rule 20(1)(a)]
- The Chief Justice may decide whether the appeal shall be dealt with based on written arguments only [Rule 20(5)]
- The matter would be argued on the date provided by the Constitutional Court.
Best of luck with your appeal.
Posted on by Telelaw
Family Law matter and legal representation by attorneys or advocates. What are common questions asked?
What follows are some frequently asked questions regarding legal representation and family law matters.What is the right of mothers in South Africa?
In South Africa, mothers have several important rights concerning their children, particularly in matters of custody, care, and parental responsibilities. Here are some key rights:- Parental Rights: Mothers have the right to make decisions about their child’s upbringing, including education, healthcare, and religion, especially if they are the primary caregiver or have sole custody.
- Custody and Access: Mothers can apply for custody of their children, and the courts prioritize the best interests of the child when determining custody arrangements. They also have the right to seek visitation rights if the father has custody.
- Child Maintenance: Mothers have the right to claim child maintenance from the father to ensure that the child’s financial needs are met.
- Legal Representation: Mothers have the right to seek legal advice and representation in family law matters, including custody disputes and maintenance claims.
- Protection Against Unreasonable Actions: Mothers can seek legal recourse if the father is acting unreasonably regarding custody, access, or maintenance obligations.
- Participation in Major Decisions: Mothers should be involved in significant decisions affecting their child’s life, such as schooling and medical treatment.
- Maternity Leave and Benefits: South African labour laws protect mothers’ rights to maternity leave and benefits in the workplace.
- Access to Social Services: Mothers can access social services and support systems to help with parenting, health care, and financial assistance if needed.
It’s essential for mothers to be aware of their rights and seek legal advice if they encounter challenges in exercising them.Can a mother keep the child away from the father in South Africa?
In South Africa, a mother cannot unilaterally keep a child away from the father without a valid legal reason. Here are some important points to consider:- Legal Custody: If the father has legal custody or parental rights, the mother must adhere to any court orders regarding access and custody. Ignoring these can lead to legal consequences.
- Best Interests of the Child: South African law prioritises the best interests of the child. Keeping a child away from a parent without a justifiable reason (e.g., concerns about safety or well-being) is generally not in the child’s best interest.
- Valid Reasons: If there are legitimate concerns—such as abuse, neglect, or substance abuse—these should be documented and, if necessary, reported to the authorities or brought before the court.
- Court Orders: If there are disputes regarding custody or access, it’s advisable to seek a court order to formally address these issues rather than taking unilateral action.
- Mediation: Engaging in mediation can help resolve conflicts between parents regarding custody and access in a way that considers the child’s best interests.
Who has more rights over a child in South Africa, a father or mother?
In South Africa, both parents generally have equal rights over a child, as the law emphasizes the best interests of the child. However, specific rights can depend on factors like custody arrangements and parental responsibilities:- Equal Rights: Both parents have equal rights in making decisions about the child’s upbringing, education, and healthcare, unless a court order states otherwise.
- Custody Arrangements: If there is a custody agreement or court order in place, the terms of that order will determine the rights of each parent. For example, if one parent has sole custody, that parent may have more decision-making power.
- Parental Responsibilities: The Children’s Act outlines parental responsibilities and rights, which include the right to care for the child, maintain contact, and contribute to the child’s upbringing. Both parents typically share these responsibilities.
- Best Interests of the Child: Courts prioritize the child’s best interests when determining custody and access, which can sometimes lead to one parent being granted more rights in certain situations.
Overall, while mothers and fathers have equal rights, individual circumstances and legal agreements can influence specific rights and responsibilities. Legal advice is recommended for parents navigating custody and access issues.Who qualifies for legal aid in South Africa and how can one apply for it?
In South Africa, legal aid is available to individuals who cannot afford legal representation. Here’s a breakdown of who qualifies and how to apply: Qualifications for Legal Aid- Financial Means Test: Legal aid is primarily aimed at those with limited financial resources. Applicants must meet specific income and asset thresholds, which are reviewed periodically.
- Type of Case: Legal aid typically covers civil, criminal, and family law matters, including:
- Criminal cases where imprisonment may be a consequence.
- Family law matters, such as divorce, custody, and maintenance.
- Certain civil cases, such as disputes involving social grants or housing.
- Merit of the Case: The case must have a reasonable chance of success. Legal aid is not provided for cases deemed frivolous or without merit.
How to Apply for Legal Aid- Visit a Legal Aid Office: Applicants can visit a local Legal Aid South Africa office. These offices are located throughout the country.
- Complete the Application Form: At the office, you’ll need to fill out an application form. Staff will assist you in understanding the process and requirements.
- Provide Documentation: You may need to present supporting documents, such as:
- Proof of income (payslips, bank statements).
- Details about your assets.
- Information about the legal issue you are facing.
- Assessment: Once your application is submitted, it will be assessed for eligibility based on financial means and the merits of the case.
- Await Decision: You will be informed about the outcome of your application. If approved, you will be assigned a legal representative.
How does pro bono work in South Africa? Pro bono legal services in South Africa refer to legal work undertaken voluntarily and without charge, aimed at assisting individuals or communities who cannot afford legal representation. Here’s how pro bono work functions in South Africa: Key Aspects of Pro Bono Work- Purpose: Pro bono services are intended to promote access to justice, particularly for marginalized or disadvantaged individuals who may be unable to afford legal fees.
- Eligibility: There are typically no strict eligibility criteria for receiving pro bono services, but organizations may prioritize cases based on need, urgency, and the potential impact of the legal issue.
- Types of Cases: Pro bono work often covers a range of legal matters, including:
- Family law (e.g., custody, divorce)
- Criminal defense
- Land rights and housing issues
- Employment law
- Public interest litigation
How Pro Bono Work is Organized- Law Firms and NGOs: Many law firms, both large and small, have pro bono departments or initiatives. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) also provide pro bono legal services, often focusing on specific areas of law.
- Legal Aid Clinics: Some universities and legal organizations operate legal aid clinics staffed by law students under the supervision of qualified attorneys, offering free legal advice and representation.
- Referral Systems: Legal practitioners may refer clients to pro bono services if they identify that the client cannot afford legal representation.
How to Access Pro Bono Services- Contact Law Firms or NGOs: Individuals seeking pro bono assistance can reach out to local law firms or NGOs that offer these services. Many firms have specific programs dedicated to pro bono work.
- Legal Aid South Africa: While this is a separate entity, it’s important to note that Legal Aid South Africa provides legal services to those who qualify based on financial means, and they may refer clients to pro bono resources.
- Community Legal Clinics: Some communities have legal clinics that provide free advice and assistance. These clinics often focus on specific legal issues and can be a valuable resource.
Benefits of Pro Bono Work- Access to Justice: Pro bono work helps bridge the gap for individuals who might otherwise be unable to afford legal help.
- Public Interest: It allows lawyers to engage in matters that benefit society as a whole, addressing systemic issues.
- Professional Development: For young lawyers and law students, pro bono work provides valuable experience and the opportunity to develop their skills while making a difference.
Overall, pro bono legal services play a crucial role in promoting equality and justice in South Africa.What is the difference between an advocate and an attorney?
In South Africa, the terms “advocate” and “attorney” refer to different roles within the legal profession. Here are the key differences: Advocate- Role: Advocates primarily represent clients in court and are specialised in litigation. They provide expert legal opinions and arguments during trials.
- Direct Access: Generally, advocates are instructed by attorneys. However, in some cases, clients can approach an advocate directly (known as “direct access”).
- Chambers: Advocates typically work independently from their own chambers or practice, rather than as part of a law firm.
Attorney- Role: Attorneys handle a wide range of legal matters, including providing legal advice, preparing documents, and managing client relationships. They often deal with clients directly.
- Court Representation: While attorneys can represent clients in lower courts, they may instruct an advocate for higher courts or more complex litigation matters.
- Law Firms: Attorneys typically work in law firms or practice independently. They may specialize in various areas of law, such as family law, criminal law, or commercial law.
- Regulation: Attorneys are regulated by the Law Society of South Africa and must complete practical legal training and pass exams to practice.
Summary In essence, attorneys are the first point of contact for clients and handle a broad range of legal work, while advocates specialize in courtroom representation and litigation. The two roles complement each other within the legal system.Can a client pay an advocate directly?
In South Africa, it is generally not standard practice for clients to pay advocates directly. Advocates are typically retained by attorneys, who then handle the payment arrangements. Here are some key points regarding this process:- Attorney-Advocate Relationship: Clients usually hire an attorney, who will then brief an advocate for specific legal representation. The attorney is responsible for paying the advocate’s fees.
- Direct Payments: While it’s possible for a client to pay an advocate directly in certain circumstances, this is less common and may require prior agreement. If an advocate is briefed directly (as in some cases of direct access), they may accept payment from the client.
- Fee Agreements: If a client and an advocate agree on direct payment, it’s essential to have a clear fee agreement in writing, outlining the services provided and the payment structure.
- Cost Orders: In court cases, if a client wins, the court may order the losing party to pay the legal costs, which could include the advocate’s fees, but these costs typically flow through the attorney.
It’s advisable for clients to clarify payment arrangements with their attorney or advocate upfront to avoid misunderstandings.
- Criminal cases where imprisonment may be a consequence.
- Family law matters, such as divorce, custody, and maintenance.
- Certain civil cases, such as disputes involving social grants or housing.
- Proof of income (payslips, bank statements).
- Details about your assets.
- Information about the legal issue you are facing.
- Family law (e.g., custody, divorce)
- Criminal defense
- Land rights and housing issues
- Employment law
- Public interest litigation
Posted on by Telelaw