Various Matrimonial Property Regimes focusing on the Accrual System

Getting married is a legal act. With it comes certain responsibilities and rights. For example, you have a legal obligation to maintain your spouse. You cannot marry anyone else, and furthermore, your spouse can inherit from you interstate. Depending on the matrimonial property regime you entered into, certain legal consequences would apply regarding the proprietary (or money) aspects of your marriage. For example, to whom do money and assets belong to acquired during the marriage and before it. In South Africa, a person has three (3) choices when it comes to getting married in relation to your matrimonial property regime. They are explained briefly below. Marriage Contract - Antenuptial - Prenuptial Agreement In Community of Property (Default system) A marriage in community of property is the default matrimonial property regime. You do not need to enter into an antenuptial contract in order to be married like this. Basically, when getting married, both spouses’ assets, money, liabilities and so on becomes one single joint estate. You can compare it to placing it all in one pot. And from that pot would the spouse’s finances be dealt with. If either spouse gets themselves into financial trouble, it is the joint estate, or the pot that would have to be looked at in order to sort it out. This would apply to financial trouble which arose even before the marriage.   Lastly, at death or divorce, the joint estate, or the pot would be divided and each party’s estate would leave with half. If you are worried about the financial implications of your marriage, you need to read further. Out of Community of Property and Profit or Loss (Without Accrual) Being married out of community of property and profit or loss is basically the exact opposite of being married in community of property. Here we are dealing with out of community of property with the exclusion of the accrual regime. Under this matrimonial property regime, there remain two separate estates just as there was before the spouses got married. Each spouse is responsible for their own wealth and debt. Creditors can therefore only claim from the estate of the relevant spouse. Not the other. At death or divorce, the situation remains exactly the same. Each estate leaves with whatever it has, being it money, assets or debt. In order for a couple to be married out of community of property and profit or loss, they need to stipulate it in an antenuptial contract and have it registered. The antenuptial contract would be executed before a Notary Public and registered at the Deeds Office. If this is not done,  then the marriage would be In Community of Property as above.  Next, we deal with a hybrid regime. You may find it more beneficial to you. Read more on antenuptial contracts by clicking here. Out of Community of Property and Profit or Loss (With Accrual) The third option a couple has is to get married out of community of property and profit or loss with the inclusion of the accrual regime. The accrual regime or system is outlined in the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984. Basically, what it entails is that during the marriage you are married out of community of property and profit or loss as in the latter section, but at divorce or death, you share in the accrual or profits of the marriage. Each spouse still retains full control over their assets and estate during the marriage. Just as out of community of property and profit or loss without the accrual. If, however, the parties divorce or one dies, they will share in the accrual or profits. If you want the accrual regime to apply to your marriage, that would be stated in your antenuptial contract. It would then also be registered at the Deeds Office. In order to work out the accrual, one needs to know the net commencement value of each party’s estate. That would be stipulated in the antenuptial contract. The Accrual system is regulated in Chapter 1 of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984. In terms of the Act, certain items are excluded when calculating the accrual unless otherwise agreed upon. This is dealt with next.

Items or amounts excluded in the accrual calculation (unless otherwise agreed upon)

  1. Amounts which accrued to that estate by way of damages, other than damages for patrimonial loss. E.g. pain and suffering;
  2. An asset which has been excluded from the accrual system in terms of the antenuptial contract of the spouses, as well as any other asset which he or she acquired by virtue of his or her possession or former possession of the first-mentioned asset;
  3. An inheritance, a legacy or a donation which accrues to a spouse during the subsistence of his or her marriage, as well as any other asset which he acquired by virtue of his or her possession or former possession of such inheritance, legacy or donation (except in so far as the spouses may agree otherwise in their antenuptial contract or in so far as the testator or donor may stipulate otherwise);
  4. Donations between spouses, other than a donation mortis causa [anticipation of the death of the donor], is not taken into account either as part of the estate of the donor or as part of the estate of the donee.
Below find the relevant sections of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 Marriage Contract - Antenuptial - Prenuptial Agreement

Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984

Extracts of the Matrimonial Property Act: CHAPTER I ACCRUAL SYSTEM 2.Marriages subject to accrual system Every marriage out of community of property in terms of an antenuptial contract by which community of property and community of profit and loss are excluded, which is entered into after the commencement of this Act, is subject to the accrual system specified in this Chapter, except in so far as that system is expressly excluded by the antenuptial contract. 3.Accrual system (1) At the dissolution of a marriage subject to the accrual system, by divorce or by the death of one or both of the spouses, the spouse whose estate shows no accrual or a smaller accrual than the estate of the other spouse, or his estate if he is deceased, acquires a claim against the other spouse or his estate for an amount equal to half of the difference between the accrual of the respective estates of the spouses. (2) Subject to the provisions of section 8(1), a claim in terms of subsection (1) arises at the dissolution of the marriage and the right of a spouse to share in terms of this Act in the accrual of the estate of the other spouse is during the subsistence of the marriage not transferable or liable to attachment, and does not form part of the insolvent estate of a spouse. 4.Accrual of estate (1) (a) The accrual of the estate of a spouse is the amount by which the net value of his estate at the dissolution his marriage exceeds the net value of his estate at the commencement of that marriage. (b) In the determination of the accrual of the estate of a spouse— (i) any amount which accrued to that estate by way of damages, other than damages for patrimonial loss, is left out of account; (ii) an asset which has been excluded from the accrual system in terms of the antenuptial contract of the spouses, as well as any other asset which he acquired by virtue of his possession or former possession of the first-mentioned asset, is not taken into account as part of that estate at the commencement or the dissolution of his marriage; (iii) the net value of that estate at the commencement of his marriage is calculated with due allowance for any difference which may exist in the value of money at the commencement and dissolution of his marriage, and for that purpose the weighted average of the consumer price index as published from time to time in the Gazette serves as prima facie proof of any change in the value of money. (2) The accrual of the estate of a deceased spouse is determined before effect is given to any testamentary disposition, donation mortis causa or succession out of that estate in terms of the law of intestate succession. 5.Inheritances, legacies and donations excluded from accrual (1) An inheritance, a legacy or a donation which accrues to a spouse during the subsistence of his marriage, as well as any other asset which he acquired by virtue of his possession or former possession of such inheritance, legacy or donation, does not form part of the accrual of his estate, except in so far as the spouses may agree otherwise in their antenuptial contract or in so far as the testator or donor may stipulate otherwise. (2) In the determination of the accrual of the estate of a spouse a donation between spouses, other than a donation mortis causa, is not taken into account either as part of the estate of the donor or as part of the estate of the donee. 6.Proof of commencement value of estate (1) Where a party to an intended marriage does not for the purpose of proof of the net value of his estate at the commencement of his marriage declare that value in the antenuptial contract concerned, he may for such purpose declare that value before the marriage is entered into or within six months thereafter in a statement, which shall be signed by the other party, and cause the statement to be attested by a notary and filed with the copy of the antenuptial contract of the parties in the protocol of the notary before whom the antenuptial contract was executed. (2) A notary attesting such a statement shall furnish the parties with a certified copy thereof on which he shall certify that the original is kept in his protocol together with the copy of the antenuptial contract of the parties or, if he is not the notary before whom the antenuptial contract was executed, he shall send the original statement by registered post to the notary in whose protocol the antenuptial contract is kept, or to the custodian of his protocol, as the case may be, and the last-mentioned notary or that custodian, shall keep the original statement together with the copy of the antenuptial contract of the parties in his protocol. (3) An antenuptial contract contemplated in subsection (1) or a certified copy thereof, or a statement signed and attested in terms of subsection (1) or a certified copy thereof contemplated in subsection (2), serves as prima facie proof of the net value of the estate of the spouse concerned at the commencement of his marriage. (4) The net value of the estate of a spouse at the commencement of his marriage is deemed to be nil if— (a) the liabilities of that spouse exceed his assets at such commencement; (b) that value was not declared in his antenuptial contract or in a statement in terms of subsection (1) and the contrary is not proved. 7.Obligation to furnish particulars of value of estate When it is necessary to determine the accrual of the estate of a spouse or a deceased spouse that spouse or the executor of the estate of the deceased spouse, as the case may be, shall within a reasonable time at the request of the other spouse or the executor of the estate of the other spouse, as the case may be, furnish full particulars of the value of that estate. Power of court to order division of accrual (1) A court may on the application of a spouse whose marriage is subject to the accrual system and who satisfies the court that his right to share in the accrual of the estate of the other spouse at the dissolution of the marriage is being or will probably be seriously prejudiced by the conduct or proposed conduct of the other spouse, and that other persons will not be prejudiced thereby, order the immediate division of the accrual concerned in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter or on such other basis as the court may deem just. (2) A court making an order under subsection (1) may order that the accrual system applicable to the marriage be replaced by a matrimonial property system in terms of which accrual sharing as well as community of property and community of profit and loss are excluded. (3) When an order is made under subsection (2), the registrar shall send a copy thereof to the registrar of deeds concerned, who shall cause an appropriate reference to the new matrimonial property system to be made on the registry duplicate of the antenuptial contract concerned and on every copy thereof tendered to him for endorsement. (4) A registrar of deeds who receives notice of a new matrimonial property system in terms of subsection (3), shall notify all other registrars of deeds accordingly and furnish each of them with a copy of the court order, and every registrar of deeds so notified shall cause an appropriate reference to the new matrimonial property system to be endorsed on the copy, if any, of the antenuptial contract concerned filed in his registry and on every copy thereof tendered to him for endorsement. 8.Forfeiture of right to accrual sharing The right to share in the accrual of the estate of a spouse in terms of this Chapter is a patrimonial benefit which may on divorce be declared forfeit, either wholly or in part. Deferment of satisfaction of accrual claim A court may on the application of a person against whom an accrual claim lies, order that satisfaction of the claim be deferred on such conditions, including conditions relating to the furnishing of security, the payment of interest, the payment of instalments, and the delivery or transfer of specified, assets, as the court may deem just. Marriage Contract - Antenuptial - Prenuptial Agreement

Various Matrimonial Property Regimes focusing on the Accrual System

Getting married is a legal act. With it comes certain responsibilities and rights. For example, you have a legal obligation to maintain your spouse. You cannot marry anyone else, and furthermore, your spouse can inherit from you interstate. Depending on the matrimonial property regime you entered into, certain legal consequences would apply regarding the proprietary (or money) aspects of your marriage. For example, to whom do money and assets belong to acquired during the marriage and before it.

In South Africa, a person has three (3) choices when it comes to getting married in relation to your matrimonial property regime. They are explained briefly below.

Marriage Contract - Antenuptial - Prenuptial Agreement

In Community of Property (Default system)

A marriage in community of property is the default matrimonial property regime. You do not need to enter into an antenuptial contract in order to be married like this. Basically, when getting married, both spouses’ assets, money, liabilities and so on becomes one single joint estate. You can compare it to placing it all in one pot. And from that pot would the spouse’s finances be dealt with. If either spouse gets themselves into financial trouble, it is the joint estate, or the pot that would have to be looked at in order to sort it out. This would apply to financial trouble which arose even before the marriage.   Lastly, at death or divorce, the joint estate, or the pot would be divided and each party’s estate would leave with half. If you are worried about the financial implications of your marriage, you need to read further.

Out of Community of Property and Profit or Loss (Without Accrual)

Being married out of community of property and profit or loss is basically the exact opposite of being married in community of property. Here we are dealing with out of community of property with the exclusion of the accrual regime. Under this matrimonial property regime, there remain two separate estates just as there was before the spouses got married. Each spouse is responsible for their own wealth and debt. Creditors can therefore only claim from the estate of the relevant spouse. Not the other. At death or divorce, the situation remains exactly the same. Each estate leaves with whatever it has, being it money, assets or debt.

In order for a couple to be married out of community of property and profit or loss, they need to stipulate it in an antenuptial contract and have it registered. The antenuptial contract would be executed before a Notary Public and registered at the Deeds Office. If this is not done,  then the marriage would be In Community of Property as above.  Next, we deal with a hybrid regime. You may find it more beneficial to you.

Read more on antenuptial contracts by clicking here.

Out of Community of Property and Profit or Loss (With Accrual)

The third option a couple has is to get married out of community of property and profit or loss with the inclusion of the accrual regime. The accrual regime or system is outlined in the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984. Basically, what it entails is that during the marriage you are married out of community of property and profit or loss as in the latter section, but at divorce or death, you share in the accrual or profits of the marriage. Each spouse still retains full control over their assets and estate during the marriage. Just as out of community of property and profit or loss without the accrual. If, however, the parties divorce or one dies, they will share in the accrual or profits.

If you want the accrual regime to apply to your marriage, that would be stated in your antenuptial contract. It would then also be registered at the Deeds Office. In order to work out the accrual, one needs to know the net commencement value of each party’s estate. That would be stipulated in the antenuptial contract. The Accrual system is regulated in Chapter 1 of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984. In terms of the Act, certain items are excluded when calculating the accrual unless otherwise agreed upon. This is dealt with next.

Items or amounts excluded in the accrual calculation (unless otherwise agreed upon)

  1. Amounts which accrued to that estate by way of damages, other than damages for patrimonial loss. E.g. pain and suffering;
  2. An asset which has been excluded from the accrual system in terms of the antenuptial contract of the spouses, as well as any other asset which he or she acquired by virtue of his or her possession or former possession of the first-mentioned asset;
  3. An inheritance, a legacy or a donation which accrues to a spouse during the subsistence of his or her marriage, as well as any other asset which he acquired by virtue of his or her possession or former possession of such inheritance, legacy or donation (except in so far as the spouses may agree otherwise in their antenuptial contract or in so far as the testator or donor may stipulate otherwise);
  4. Donations between spouses, other than a donation mortis causa [anticipation of the death of the donor], is not taken into account either as part of the estate of the donor or as part of the estate of the donee.

Below find the relevant sections of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984

Marriage Contract - Antenuptial - Prenuptial Agreement

Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984

Extracts of the Matrimonial Property Act:

CHAPTER I

ACCRUAL SYSTEM

2.Marriages subject to accrual system

Every marriage out of community of property in terms of an antenuptial contract by which community of property and community of profit and loss are excluded, which is entered into after the commencement of this Act, is subject to the accrual system specified in this Chapter, except in so far as that system is expressly excluded by the antenuptial contract.
3.Accrual system
(1) At the dissolution of a marriage subject to the accrual system, by divorce or by the death of one or both of the spouses, the spouse whose estate shows no accrual or a smaller accrual than the estate of the other spouse, or his estate if he is deceased, acquires a claim against the other spouse or his estate for an amount equal to half of the difference between the accrual of the respective estates of the spouses.

(2) Subject to the provisions of section 8(1), a claim in terms of subsection (1) arises at the dissolution of the marriage and the right of a spouse to share in terms of this Act in the accrual of the estate of the other spouse is during the subsistence of the marriage not transferable or liable to attachment, and does not form part of the insolvent estate of a spouse.

4.Accrual of estate
(1) (a) The accrual of the estate of a spouse is the amount by which the net value of his estate at the dissolution his marriage exceeds the net value of his estate at the commencement of that marriage.

(b) In the determination of the accrual of the estate of a spouse—

(i) any amount which accrued to that estate by way of damages, other than damages for patrimonial loss, is left out of account;

(ii) an asset which has been excluded from the accrual system in terms of the antenuptial contract of the spouses, as well as any other asset which he acquired by virtue of his possession or former possession of the first-mentioned asset, is not taken into account as part of that estate at the commencement or the dissolution of his marriage;

(iii) the net value of that estate at the commencement of his marriage is calculated with due allowance for any difference which may exist in the value of money at the commencement and dissolution of his marriage, and for that purpose the weighted average of the consumer price index as published from time to time in the Gazette serves as prima facie proof of any change in the value of money.

(2) The accrual of the estate of a deceased spouse is determined before effect is given to any testamentary disposition, donation mortis causa or succession out of that estate in terms of the law of intestate succession.

5.Inheritances, legacies and donations excluded from accrual
(1) An inheritance, a legacy or a donation which accrues to a spouse during the subsistence of his marriage, as well as any other asset which he acquired by virtue of his possession or former possession of such inheritance, legacy or donation, does not form part of the accrual of his estate, except in so far as the spouses may agree otherwise in their antenuptial contract or in so far as the testator or donor may stipulate otherwise.

(2) In the determination of the accrual of the estate of a spouse a donation between spouses, other than a donation mortis causa, is not taken into account either as part of the estate of the donor or as part of the estate of the donee.

6.Proof of commencement value of estate
(1) Where a party to an intended marriage does not for the purpose of proof of the net value of his estate at the commencement of his marriage declare that value in the antenuptial contract concerned, he may for such purpose declare that value before the marriage is entered into or within six months thereafter in a statement, which shall be signed by the other party, and cause the statement to be attested by a notary and filed with the copy of the antenuptial contract of the parties in the protocol of the notary before whom the antenuptial contract was executed.

(2) A notary attesting such a statement shall furnish the parties with a certified copy thereof on which he shall certify that the original is kept in his protocol together with the copy of the antenuptial contract of the parties or, if he is not the notary before whom the antenuptial contract was executed, he shall send the original statement by registered post to the notary in whose protocol the antenuptial contract is kept, or to the custodian of his protocol, as the case may be, and the last-mentioned notary or that custodian, shall keep the original statement together with the copy of the antenuptial contract of the parties in his protocol.

(3) An antenuptial contract contemplated in subsection (1) or a certified copy thereof, or a statement signed and attested in terms of subsection (1) or a certified copy thereof contemplated in subsection (2), serves as prima facie proof of the net value of the estate of the spouse concerned at the commencement of his marriage.

(4) The net value of the estate of a spouse at the commencement of his marriage is deemed to be nil if—

(a) the liabilities of that spouse exceed his assets at such commencement;

(b) that value was not declared in his antenuptial contract or in a statement in terms of subsection (1) and the contrary is not proved.

7.Obligation to furnish particulars of value of estate
When it is necessary to determine the accrual of the estate of a spouse or a deceased spouse that spouse or the executor of the estate of the deceased spouse, as the case may be, shall within a reasonable time at the request of the other spouse or the executor of the estate of the other spouse, as the case may be, furnish full particulars of the value of that estate.
Power of court to order division of accrual
(1) A court may on the application of a spouse whose marriage is subject to the accrual system and who satisfies the court that his right to share in the accrual of the estate of the other spouse at the dissolution of the marriage is being or will probably be seriously prejudiced by the conduct or proposed conduct of the other spouse, and that other persons will not be prejudiced thereby, order the immediate division of the accrual concerned in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter or on such other basis as the court may deem just.

(2) A court making an order under subsection (1) may order that the accrual system applicable to the marriage be replaced by a matrimonial property system in terms of which accrual sharing as well as community of property and community of profit and loss are excluded.

(3) When an order is made under subsection (2), the registrar shall send a copy thereof to the registrar of deeds concerned, who shall cause an appropriate reference to the new matrimonial property system to be made on the registry duplicate of the antenuptial contract concerned and on every copy thereof tendered to him for endorsement.

(4) A registrar of deeds who receives notice of a new matrimonial property system in terms of subsection (3), shall notify all other registrars of deeds accordingly and furnish each of them with a copy of the court order, and every registrar of deeds so notified shall cause an appropriate reference to the new matrimonial property system to be endorsed on the copy, if any, of the antenuptial contract concerned filed in his registry and on every copy thereof tendered to him for endorsement.

8.Forfeiture of right to accrual sharing
The right to share in the accrual of the estate of a spouse in terms of this Chapter is a patrimonial benefit which may on divorce be declared forfeit, either wholly or in part.
Deferment of satisfaction of accrual claim
A court may on the application of a person against whom an accrual claim lies, order that satisfaction of the claim be deferred on such conditions, including conditions relating to the furnishing of security, the payment of interest, the payment of instalments, and the delivery or transfer of specified, assets, as the court may deem just.

Marriage Contract - Antenuptial - Prenuptial Agreement

Related Post

[caption id="attachment_10824" align="alignnone" width="664"]Relocation consent Court Order for minor child to China - Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf Relocation consent Court Order for minor child to China – Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf[/caption]

I want to relocate from South Africa to China with my minor child. The other parent does not want my child to relocate to China. What can I do?

China is a popular destination to emigrate to. People emigrate from South Africa for many reasons. It ranges from better employment opportunities, family relations, or for a better standard of living. Whatever the reason a parent wants to relocate to China, if a minor child will be joining that parent and also relocating to China, then the parent remaining in South Africa’s consent would usually be required. Let us unpack the legal issues a parent may encounter when wanting to emigrate to China. Before we do so, let us list the various cities and towns in China to which you may want to relocate: Anhui (province), Anqing, Bengbu, Hefei, Huainan, Huangshan, Ma’anshan, Shexian, Tongcheng, Tongling, Wuhu, Xuancheng, Beijing (provincial-level municipality, capital), Beijing, Chongqing (provincial-level municipality), Chongqing, Hechuan, Wanzhou, Fujian (province), Fuzhou, Longyan, Nanping, Quanzhou, Sanming, Shaowu, Xiamen, Yong’an, Zhangzhou, Gansu (province), Dunhuang, Jiuquan, Lanzhou, Pingliang, Tianshui, Wuwei, Yumen, Guangdong (province), Chaozhou, Foshan, Guangzhou, Jiangmen, Maoming, Meizhou, Shantou, Shaoguan, Shenzhen, Zhanjiang, Zhaoqing, Zhongshan, Guangxi (autonomous region), Baise, Beihai, Guilin, Liuzhou, Nanning, Pingxiang, Wuzhou, Yulin, Guizhou (province), Anshun, Duyun, Guiyang, Zunyi, Hainan (province), Haikou, Hebei (province), Baoding, Cangzhou, Chengde, Handan, Kalgan, Qinhuangdao, Shanhaiguan, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Xingtai, Xuanhua, Zhengding, Heilongjiang (province), Acheng, Binxian, Harbin, Hegang, Hulan, Jiamusi, Jixi, Mudanjiang, Qiqihar, Shuangyashan, Yichun, Henan (province), Anyang, Hebi, Jiaozuo, Kaifeng, Luohe, Luoyang, Nanyang, Shangqiu, Xinxiang, Xinyang, Xuchang, Zhengzhou, Zhoukou, Hong Kong (special administrative region), Hong Kong, Victoria, Hubei (province), Daye, Hankou, Hanyang, Huangshi, Jingzhou, Laohekou, Wuchang, Wuhan, Xiangfan, Yichang, Hunan (province), Changde, Changsha, Hengyang, Jinshi, Shaoyang, Xiangtan, Yiyang, Yueyang, Zhuzhou, Inner Mongolia (autonomous region), Baotou, Chifeng, Duolun, Erenhot, Hailar, Hohhot, Jining, Manzhouli, Tongliao, Jiangsu (province), Changshu, Changzhou, Huai’an, Huaiyin, Lianyungang, Nanjing, Nantong, Suzhou, Taizhou, Wuxi, Xuzhou, Yancheng, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Jiangxi (province), Ganzhou, Ji’an, Jingdezhen, Jiujiang, Nanchang, Pingxiang, Shangrao, Zhangshu, Jilin (province), Baicheng, Changchun, Jilin, Liaoyuan, Siping, Tonghua, Yanji, Liaoning (province), Anshan, Beipiao, Benxi, Dalian, Dandong, Fushun, Fuxin, Jinzhou (southern Liaoning), Jinzhou (western Liaoning), Liaoyang, Lüshun, Shenyang, Wafangdian, Yingkou, Macau (special administrative region), Macau, Ningxia (autonomous region), Yinchuan, Qinghai (province), Golmud, Lenghu, Xining, Shaanxi (province), Ankang, Baoji, Hanzhong, Shangluo, Tongguan, Xi’an, Xianyang, Yan’an, Shandong (province), Dezhou, Jinan, Jining, Linzi, Qingdao, Qufu, Weifang, Weihai, Yantai, Zaozhuang, Zibo, Shanghai (provincial-level municipality), Shanghai, Shanxi (province), Changzhi, Datong, Jinzhong, Linfen, Puzhou, Taiyuan, Yangquan, Sichuan (province), Chengdu, Kangding, Luzhou, Mianyang, Nanchong, Neijiang, Wutongqiao, Ya’an, Yibin, Zigong, Tianjin (provincial-level municipality), Tanggu, Tianjin, Tibet (autonomous region), Gartok, Gyangzê, Lhasa, Xigazê, Xinjiang (autonomous region), Hami, Hotan, Karamay, Kashgar, Kucha, Kuldja, Shihezi, Turfan, Ürümqi, Yarkand, Yunnan (province), Dali, Gejiu, Jinghong, Kaiyuan, Kunming, Pu’er, Zhejiang (province), Fenghua, Hangzhou, Huzhou, Jiaxing, Jinhua, Ningbo, Quzhou, Shaoxing, Wenzhou. (https://www.britannica.com/topic/List-of-cities-in-China-2040392)

Why do I require the other parent’s Consent to relocate to China?

According to South African law, if you are a co-holder of parental responsibilities and rights over your minor child, you must consent to your child leaving South Africa. In this case, relocating to China. Here we refer to section 18 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005. The entire provision is as follows: 18 Parental responsibilities and rights  (1) A person may have either full or specific parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child.  (2) The parental responsibilities and rights that a person may have in respect of a child, include the responsibility and the right-  (a) to care for the child;  (b) to maintain contact with the child;  (c) to act as guardian of the child; and  (d) to contribute to the maintenance of the child.  (3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), a parent or other person who acts as guardian of a child must-  (a) administer and safeguard the child’s property and property interests;  (b) assist or represent the child in administrative, contractual and other legal matters; or  (c) give or refuse any consent required by law in respect of the child, including-  (i) consent to the child’s marriage;  (ii) consent to the child’s adoption;  (iii) consent to the child’s departure or removal from the Republic;  (iv) consent to the child’s application for a passport; and  (v) consent to the alienation or encumbrance of any immovable property of the child.  (4) Whenever more than one person has guardianship of a child, each one of them is competent, subject to subsection (5), any other law or any order of a competent court to the contrary, to exercise independently and without the Consent of the other any right or responsibility arising from such guardianship. (5) Unless a competent court orders otherwise, the Consent of all the persons that have guardianship of a child is necessary in respect of matters set out in subsection (3)(c). Now let us explain what Parental Responsibilities and Rights are.

What are Parental Responsibilities and Rights of a parent in relation to a child?

As can be seen from section 18(2) of the Children’s Act, when we refer to Parental Responsibilities and Rights, we refer to the following: (a) to care for the child;  (b) to maintain contact with the child;  (c) to act as guardian of the child; and  (d) to contribute to the maintenance of the child. Therefore, if a parent has parental responsibilities and rights over a minor child, and accordingly, rights of guardianship, their Consent is required when it comes to issues of guardianship. As seen from section 18(3)(c) of the Children’s Act above, both parents’ Consent is required should a minor child depart from the Republic of South Africa. In this case, to emigrate to China. Even if the minor child only wants to go for a short holiday to China, both guardians’ Consent would be required.

When would the other parent be seen as a guardian in the case of a relocation matter to China?

It must be noted that not all parents are legal guardians over their minor children. We should therefore distinguish between married or divorced parents and parents who were never married. As you would see below, usually married, or divorced parents’ Consent would be required for a minor child to relocate or emigrate to China. However, that does not automatically apply to parents who were never married. This could be because the child could have been born from a brief encounter and never met his or her father. It would not make sense that a parent who never met his or her 15-year-old child, should give Consent for relocation to China.

Mother’s Consent for relocation of the minor child to China

Section 19 of the Children’s Act deals with the Parental responsibilities and rights of mothers. It states the following: 19 Parental responsibilities and rights of mothers  (1) The biological mother of a child, whether married or unmarried, has full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the child.  (2) If-  (a) the biological mother of a child is an unmarried child who does not have guardianship in respect of the child; and  (b) the biological father of the child does not have guardianship in respect of the child, the guardian of the child’s biological mother is also the guardian of the child.  (3) This section does not apply in respect of a child who is the subject of a surrogacy agreement. As seen from section 19(1) of the Children’s Act, in most cases involving the relocation of a minor child to China, the mother’s Consent is required as she has full parental responsibilities and rights over the minor child.

Married father’s Consent for the relocation of the minor child to China

Section 20 of the Children’s Act deals with Parental responsibilities and rights of married fathers. It states the following: 20 Parental responsibilities and rights of married fathers The biological father of a child has full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the child- (a) if he is married to the child’s mother; or (b) if he was married to the child’s mother at (i) the time of the child’s conception; (ii) the time of the child’s birth; or (iii) any time between the child’s conception and birth. As can be seen from sections 20 (a) and (b) of the Children’s Act, if the father and the mother were married, or are married, then his Consent is required for the minor child to relocate to China. Of course, an exception to this would be should a court of law order otherwise. This would be the case should the parents be divorced and the divorce court ordered that only the mother may act as guardian. Next, we deal with the issue of an unmarried father’s Consent to relocate a minor child to China.

Consent of unmarried fathers for the relocation of their minor children to China.

Section 21 of the Children’s Act deals with parental responsibilities and rights of unmarried fathers. The section states the following: 21 Parental responsibilities and rights of unmarried fathers  (1) The biological father of a child who does not have parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the child in terms of section 20, acquires full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the child-  (a) if at the time of the child’s birth he is living with the mother in a permanent life-partnership; or  (b) if he, regardless of whether he has lived or is living with the mother-  (i) consents to be identified or successfully applies in terms of section 26 to be identified as the child’s father or pays damages in terms of customary law;  (ii) contributes or has attempted in good faith to contribute to the child’s upbringing for a reasonable period; and  (iii) contributes or has attempted in good faith to contribute towards expenses in connection with the maintenance of the child for a reasonable period.  (2) This section does not affect the duty of a father to contribute towards the maintenance of the child.  (3) (a) If there is a dispute between the biological father referred to in subsection (1) and the biological mother of a child with regard to the fulfilment by that father of the conditions set out in subsection (1) (a) or (b), the matter must be referred for mediation to a family advocate, social worker, social service professional or other suitably qualified person.  (b) Any party to the mediation may have the outcome  of the mediation reviewed by a court.  (4) This section applies regardless of whether the child was born before or after the commencement of this Act. As can be seen from the latter sections, a father of a child born out of wedlock does not automatically have parental responsibilities and rights over his minor child. He may however acquire those parental responsibilities and rights over his minor child if he is materially involved in the child’s life. That would be where the father and the mother were in a permanent life partnership when the child was born or he is meaningfully involved in the child’s life, as outlined above. We shall not go into much detail regarding that. However, in most cases, if the father had regular contact with the child and paid child support, he would have acquired parental responsibilities and rights over the minor child.

What do you do if the other parent does not want to consent to the minor child relocating to China?

Suppose the other parent also has parental responsibilities and rights over the minor child, and he or she does not want to consent to the relocation of the minor child to China, then in such a case, the Court needs to be approached. Here I refer you back to section 18(5) of the Children’s Act referred to above where it states: (5) Unless a competent court orders otherwise, the Consent of all the persons that have guardianship of a child is necessary in respect of matters set out in subsection (3)(c). Therefore, after your Court Application has been launched an both sides have been heard, the Court would make the necessary Order. If you are successful in your application for the relocation of your minor children to China, then the Court will make an Order similar to that which is shown below. [caption id="attachment_10823" align="alignnone" width="682"]Relocation consent Court Order for minor child to China - Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf Relocation consent Court Order for minor child to China – Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf[/caption] [caption id="attachment_10824" align="alignnone" width="692"]Relocation consent Court Order for minor child to China - Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf Relocation consent Court Order for minor child to China – Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf[/caption]  

Family Law Service – Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf – Finding the best lawyer for you.

Choosing the right law firm (Attorney or Advocate) can be a daunting task in the intricate landscape of legal matters. Whether you’re facing a complex litigation case, navigating corporate law, or seeking legal assistance for personal issues, the decision of which law firm to engage is crucial. At the firm Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, we understand the significance of this decision, and we aim to demonstrate why choosing our firm can make all the difference.

Expertise and Specialisation

One of the primary reasons for choosing our law firm is our expertise and specialisation in diverse legal areas. As you can see from this website, advocate Muhammad Abduroaf practices in various fields of law. This breadth of expertise ensures that no matter the nature of your legal issue, you will have access to knowledgeable and experienced professionals who can provide tailored solutions.

Personalised Approach

We recognise that every client and every case is unique. That’s why we prioritise a personalised approach to legal representation. From the moment you engage our services, we take the time to understand your specific needs, concerns, and objectives. This allows us to develop strategies and solutions customised to your circumstances, ensuring the best possible outcome for your case.

Commitment to Excellence

At Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, excellence is not just a goal – it’s our standard. We are committed to providing our clients with the highest quality legal services, characterized by thorough research, meticulous attention to detail, and strategic thinking. Our track record of success speaks for itself, with numerous satisfied clients who have benefited from our dedication to excellence.

Responsive and Accessible

Legal matters can be stressful and overwhelming, so we prioritise responsiveness and accessibility. Our team is readily available to address your questions, concerns, and needs throughout your case. Whether you prefer to communicate via phone, WhatsApp, email, or in-person meetings, we are here to provide you with the support and guidance you need when you need it.

Cost-Effective Solutions

Legal representation shouldn’t break the bank. That’s why we are committed to providing cost-effective solutions that deliver value for our clients. We offer transparent billing practices and strive to minimise unnecessary expenses wherever possible, ensuring you receive top-notch legal services without the hefty price tag.

Ethical and Professional Conduct

Integrity and ethics are at the core of everything we do. Our team adheres to the highest standards of professional conduct, ensuring your case is handled with the utmost integrity, honesty, and discretion. You can trust that your legal matters will be handled with care and respect, and your confidentiality will always be protected. In conclusion, choosing the right law firm can significantly impact the outcome of your legal matters. At Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, we offer expertise, specialisation, personalised service, commitment to excellence, responsiveness, cost-effective solutions, and ethical conduct. These qualities set us apart and make us the ideal choice for clients seeking top-notch legal representation. Contact us today to learn how we can assist you with your legal needs. If you require an Advocate Law Firm to assist you in your legal matter, feel free to contact us using the following details:
    • Tel.: 021 111 0090
    • Email.: [email protected]
We service clients throughout South Africa. These include: Cape Town Rustenburg Kimberley East London Nelspruit Polokwane Pietermaritzburg Bloemfontein Port Elizabeth Pretoria Durban Johannesburg

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!