The role of antenuptial contracts in South Africa – What do you need to know before getting married?

When people are in love, they often want to spend the rest of their lives together. And one way of doing so is to get married. Usually, after they got married, they will start a family. However, there is one important aspect many people do not consider before getting married. And that is the propriety regime that would apply to their marriage. In other words, what belongs to who during the marriage and after the marriage should they divorce or one spouse passes away.

Marriages in community of property – The Standard Regime

In South Africa, the default matrimonial property regime is that of in community of property and profit and loss.  What this means, is that whatever property the couple have during the marriage, they would share. This includes debt. Therefore, should a party receive a huge sum of money during the marriage, that money would belong to both the parties and form part of the joint estate. The same principle would apply should a party get into financial trouble. In such a case both the spouses or the joint estate would be responsible for that debt. If spouses are happy to share in each other’s wealth and liabilities during the marriage, then being married in community of property may be a good option. However, if this matrimonial property regime does not appeal to a couple before they get married, then a different matrimonial property regime should be looked at. Now let us move on to a marriage out of community of property.

Marriages out of community of property – with or without the accrual regime

Marriages out of community of property may take two faces. The first is out of community of property without the inclusion of the accrual regime. This is its purest form. The other would be a marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime. Before we explain the differences between the two, we need to explain to you what it is meant to be married out of community of property and profit and loss.

Marriage out of community of property

Being married out of community of property means that spouses during the marriage own their own assets and are solely responsible for any debt owed by either of them. This can be compared to a marriage in community of property where the opposite applies. Therefore, if the couple is married out of community of property, a spouse would not require the other spouse’s consent to incur a debt. A spouse would not be entitled to claim any monies belonging to the other spouse by virtue of being married. In short, if you are married out of community of property, you are solely responsible for your estate. As would be seen further below, to be married out of community of property you have to enter into an antenuptial contract.

What is the accrual regime?

As mentioned above, a marriage out of community of property could have the accrual regime apply to it or not. The aspect of accrual only comes into play should the parties divorce or one of them pass away. The parties would then share in half the difference between the two estates. This amount is referred to as the accrual. Therefore, by way of example, should one spouse pass away and the estate of the deceased has grown in the sum of R10 000 – 00, then the surviving spouse should receive half of that. The above example would apply if the surviving spouse’s estate has not grown at all. If it has grown, then they would share in half the difference of their respective growths.

Marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime

The accrual regime automatically applies to a marriage out of community of property, unless it is expressly excluded in an antenuptial contract. During the marriage, the same principles as above apply to a marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime.

Marriage out of community of property with the exclusion of the accrual regime

If the couple does not want the accrual regime to apply to their marriage out of community of property, they need to expressly stipulate it in the antenuptial contract. If they do not do so, then their marriage would automatically be out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime.

Parties entering into an antenuptial contract before the marriage

As stated, if a couple wants to get married out of community of property with or without the inclusion of the accrual regime, they need to enter into an antenuptial contract. They would sign a document wherein they stipulate what matrimonial property regime would apply to the marriage. Other matters may be included in an antenuptial contract. For example, assets that should not be included in the calculation of the accrual. The antenuptial contract is signed before a notary public and it is registered at the Deeds Office. In that way, the public would know that you are married out of community of property.

What happens if I did not enter into an antenuptial contract and want to change it later?

Should a couple get married and later decide to change the matrimonial property regime, they may do so with the consent of the High Court. A court application would have to be made to the High Court explaining to the court why they wish to change the matrimonial property regime and also which property regime they now wish to apply to them.

Publication of Application to change the matrimonial property regime

Various other information would be included in the High Court Application which could entail details of various creditors of the spouses and their assets and liabilities and so on. Attached to the court documents would also be a draft postnuptial contract. The Application and the Court date would be published in the Government Gazette and one or two local newspapers for potential creditors to be informed about the pending Court Application.

Informing creditors of the change in the matrimonial property regime

Various creditors would also be notified of the application via registered mail. The application can be expensive because of the work and expenses involved. This cost includes attorney fees advocate fees, publication fees etc. It is therefore important to decide before the marriage whether or not the matrimonial property regime of community of property is the best regime for you before getting married. If it is not the best for you and your intended spouse, we advised that the enter into an antenuptial contract. This will not only save you money in the long run but also avoid a lot of complications in the future. Speak to us should you wish to enter into an antenuptial contract. Our antenuptial contract product may be purchased here.   We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws    
Posted on by Telelaw

The role of antenuptial contracts in South Africa – What do you need to know before getting married?

When people are in love, they often want to spend the rest of their lives together. And one way of doing so is to get married. Usually, after they got married, they will start a family. However, there is one important aspect many people do not consider before getting married. And that is the propriety regime that would apply to their marriage. In other words, what belongs to who during the marriage and after the marriage should they divorce or one spouse passes away.

Marriages in community of property – The Standard Regime

In South Africa, the default matrimonial property regime is that of in community of property and profit and loss.  What this means, is that whatever property the couple have during the marriage, they would share. This includes debt. Therefore, should a party receive a huge sum of money during the marriage, that money would belong to both the parties and form part of the joint estate. The same principle would apply should a party get into financial trouble. In such a case both the spouses or the joint estate would be responsible for that debt.

If spouses are happy to share in each other’s wealth and liabilities during the marriage, then being married in community of property may be a good option. However, if this matrimonial property regime does not appeal to a couple before they get married, then a different matrimonial property regime should be looked at. Now let us move on to a marriage out of community of property.

Marriages out of community of property – with or without the accrual regime

Marriages out of community of property may take two faces. The first is out of community of property without the inclusion of the accrual regime. This is its purest form. The other would be a marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime. Before we explain the differences between the two, we need to explain to you what it is meant to be married out of community of property and profit and loss.

Marriage out of community of property

Being married out of community of property means that spouses during the marriage own their own assets and are solely responsible for any debt owed by either of them. This can be compared to a marriage in community of property where the opposite applies. Therefore, if the couple is married out of community of property, a spouse would not require the other spouse’s consent to incur a debt. A spouse would not be entitled to claim any monies belonging to the other spouse by virtue of being married. In short, if you are married out of community of property, you are solely responsible for your estate. As would be seen further below, to be married out of community of property you have to enter into an antenuptial contract.

What is the accrual regime?

As mentioned above, a marriage out of community of property could have the accrual regime apply to it or not. The aspect of accrual only comes into play should the parties divorce or one of them pass away. The parties would then share in half the difference between the two estates. This amount is referred to as the accrual. Therefore, by way of example, should one spouse pass away and the estate of the deceased has grown in the sum of R10 000 – 00, then the surviving spouse should receive half of that. The above example would apply if the surviving spouse’s estate has not grown at all. If it has grown, then they would share in half the difference of their respective growths.

Marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime

The accrual regime automatically applies to a marriage out of community of property, unless it is expressly excluded in an antenuptial contract. During the marriage, the same principles as above apply to a marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime.

Marriage out of community of property with the exclusion of the accrual regime

If the couple does not want the accrual regime to apply to their marriage out of community of property, they need to expressly stipulate it in the antenuptial contract. If they do not do so, then their marriage would automatically be out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime.

Parties entering into an antenuptial contract before the marriage

As stated, if a couple wants to get married out of community of property with or without the inclusion of the accrual regime, they need to enter into an antenuptial contract. They would sign a document wherein they stipulate what matrimonial property regime would apply to the marriage. Other matters may be included in an antenuptial contract. For example, assets that should not be included in the calculation of the accrual.

The antenuptial contract is signed before a notary public and it is registered at the Deeds Office. In that way, the public would know that you are married out of community of property.

What happens if I did not enter into an antenuptial contract and want to change it later?

Should a couple get married and later decide to change the matrimonial property regime, they may do so with the consent of the High Court. A court application would have to be made to the High Court explaining to the court why they wish to change the matrimonial property regime and also which property regime they now wish to apply to them.

Publication of Application to change the matrimonial property regime

Various other information would be included in the High Court Application which could entail details of various creditors of the spouses and their assets and liabilities and so on. Attached to the court documents would also be a draft postnuptial contract. The Application and the Court date would be published in the Government Gazette and one or two local newspapers for potential creditors to be informed about the pending Court Application.

Informing creditors of the change in the matrimonial property regime

Various creditors would also be notified of the application via registered mail. The application can be expensive because of the work and expenses involved. This cost includes attorney fees advocate fees, publication fees etc. It is therefore important to decide before the marriage whether or not the matrimonial property regime of community of property is the best regime for you before getting married. If it is not the best for you and your intended spouse, we advised that the enter into an antenuptial contract. This will not only save you money in the long run but also avoid a lot of complications in the future.

Speak to us should you wish to enter into an antenuptial contract. Our antenuptial contract product may be purchased here.

 

We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well.

Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links:

Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws

 

 

Related Post

Passport Application for a minor child: Mother cannot find the father to provide the necessary consent at the Department of Home Affairs. The Application is therefore refused.

Passport Application for a minor child: It is not easy being a single parent, and at the same time, the primary caregiver of the child. This is even so where the other parent pays child support and regularly sees the child. This article deals with the situation where the father of the child is missing. He, therefore, does not pay any child support, nor has a relationship with the child. This causes a problem when it comes to issues of guardianship rights. For example, when the mother wants to enrol the child in a school or provide medical consent. The question would always arise – “where is the father?”, or “did the father give his consent?” When it comes to official matters, for example, the application for a passport, then things become more complicated. This is where the issue of parental consent for the application for a passport is looked at. Now let us first deal with the law.

Set up a Consultation with us.Parental Responsibilities and Rights of Fathers

In short, if a father was married to the mother, he would automatically have full parental responsibilities and rights to the child born from them. This includes the rights of care, contact and guardianship. If he was not married to the mother of the child, he can acquire parental responsibilities and rights. In short, in order for the unmarried father to acquire parental responsibilities and rights, he has to form part of the child’s life. He may also attempt to do so and the mother hinders it from happening. In the latter situation, he would still acquire parental responsibilities and rights.

The Unmarried Father’s Rights

The unmarried father can acquire parental responsibilities and rights to his child in a number of ways. They include paying child support, visiting the child and so on. Therefore, not all fathers would have parental responsibilities and rights over their children. Some fathers just impregnated the mothers and went missing. Such a father cannot rock up, 12 years later and demand to take the child with him to the movies. I think you understand the point  we are trying to make.

What is the legal effect of having parental responsibilities and rights over a child?

Should a father have parental responsibilities and rights over a child – he has certain defined rights. Those rights could either be absolute, or specific. An absolute right would be one of guardianship. An example would be an application for a passport or the removal of a child from the Republic. In the latter cases, the father’s consent is an absolute requirement which can only be taken away by a court of law. Then there are relative parental responsibilities and rights over a child. These rights depend on the circumstances of the case. An example would be that of visitation. A father who has parental responsibilities and rights of contact over a child cannot demand to see the child at any time. He may not even be able to demand to see the child half the time. His contact rights would be limited to what is in the child’s bests interests. And that would change from time to time. For example, should the father live 100km away from his children, contact could be every second weekend. But, should he live down the road, it could be every second day.

The Legal Problem for unmarried parents and their rights

The consent required in relation to the exercise of parental responsibilities and rights over certain children have challenges. How would anyone know whether or not an unmarried father has parental responsibilities and rights? For example, lets say the father was never involved in the child’s life – what proof does she have to show the authorities that the father does not have any parental responsibilities and rights? Would the Department of Home Affairs just accept the allegation made by the mother? I do not think so. And this could cause a problem in two ways. Let’s say the father has parental responsibilities and rights over a child. The mother however now wishes to relocate overseas. She tells the authorities at the Department of Home Affairs that she does not know where the father is, and he was never involved in the child’s life. If the Department of Home Affairs accepts her lie, the mother would be able to leave South Africa with the child, and without the father knowing. Let alone obtain his consent. On the other hand, let’s say that the father was really not involved in the child’s life since birth. He went missing after he found out the mother was pregnant. He never paid for any of the birthing costs, nor any of the child’s expenses since birth. Should the mother approach the Department of Home Affairs, would they allow her to obtain a passport without the father’s consent? We could be wrong, but we doubt they will.

What can a mother do if she does not have the consent from the father

As the law stands and with the current position of the Department of Home Affairs, the following needs to be done if the father refuses to give his consent, or cannot be found.

Application to the High Court

We advise that you consult with a legal advisor to advise you on the merits of your case. If there are merits, an application to the relevant court would be made. The Court would decide on the matter after hearing from both the parents. If it is decided that it would be best for the child to obtain a passport or relocate, the court would grant the appropriate order.

These are the documents that would form part of the Court file:

Notice of Motion

This document outlines the relief you are asking the court for. This would be the case where the details of the father is known.  Two of the clauses could be as follows:
  • The Respondent’s consent is not required for the departure of the minor child, Little One, with identity number 0813040502086 (hereafter referred to as “the minor child”), from the Republic of South Africa, and to relocate to France, as provided for in section 18(5) of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005;
  • The Respondent’s consent is not required for the return of the minor child to the Republic of South Africa for visits;

Founding Affidavit

In this document, you outline the facts of the matter. You would deal with why you want consent.

Opposing Affidavit

If the father opposes the Application, he would file this affidavit. In this document he would outline reasons why the court should not give consent.

Replying Affidavit

You would then get an opportunity to reply to the father’s allegations made.

Advice to parents who wants to relocate or temporary leave South Africa with the minor child

If you need to relocate, with a child, and the other parent refuses to give consent, speak to a legal advisor, or to us. They would advise you on your case, and if need be, assist or direct you to the proper people for an Application to court for an order that the requirement of consent is dispensed with. Should you be successful in such an application, the Order would be shown to the Department of Home Affairs when applying for a passport and when leaving the Country. The Officials would comply with the Order. The Order of Court can also be shown to the officials overseas should they want to know where the consent of the father is. [caption id="attachment_7081" align="alignleft" width="217"]Advocate Cape Town Lawyer Attorney Legal High Court Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf[/caption] In the same manner, should you want to leave South Africa to go overseas on holiday with the minor, approach us for advice should the other parent refuse to give consent. Your visit overseas could be to visit a family member, or just for a break. There should be no reason why you cannot take the minor child with you on holiday. [caption id="attachment_6387" align="alignleft" width="300"]Business Legal Advice - Cape Town Contact us today[/caption]

Sharing is Caring

This and other articles and posts found on this website are written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf to assist people with various family law related issues they may have. If you find any of our articles, free resources and posts interesting, or possibly useful to others, please like and share it on Social Media by clicking on the icons below. For business servics, visit Business SA.              
Posted on by Telelaw

Best advice on finding a top divorce lawyer for your divorce case in Somerset West, Cape Town

Do you live in Somerset West, and are you considering divorcing your spouse? Or have you been threatened with divorce? Either way, a divorce is a legal matter, and it is best to find sound legal advice or assistance. Furthermore, divorcing someone has potential severe legal consequences you may not know of. The first consequence, of course, is that you are no longer married to your former spouse, and there is no legal obligation to maintain each other (unless you qualify for alimony). You may also not inherit from your former spouse’s intestate. Lastly, and obviously, you are free to marry someone else. However, do you know of the proprietary (property) consequences of getting a divorce? What about the assets and debt you and your spouse incurred in Somerset West or elsewhere during your marriage? Do you know what should happen to it? If not, it is best you find out about these critical aspects and others before getting divorced. Then there is the issue of parental responsibilities and rights after the divorce should there be minor children involved. This article aims to provide guidance on finding the best attorney or advocate for your divorce matter that can adequately and properly advise you or handle your divorce. The advice would apply whether you live in Somerset West or anywhere else in South Africa. The issues we shall deal with are the following.
  • Gender of the Advocate or attorney;
  • Location of the Advocate or attorney;
  • Experience of the Advocate or attorney;
  • Costs of the Advocate or Attorney; and
  • The personality of the Advocate or Attorney.

What is the best gender of the Advocate or Attorney I need to use for my divorce? Is a male or female better?

Generally, the gender of your Advocate or Attorney should not play a role at all in a legal matter. However, depending on your background and the issues involved in your divorce, you may prefer a specific gender where you may feel more comfortable. A female who has been emotionally, physically and psychologically abused may be more comfortable with a female Attorney or Advocate. However, the same female client may prefer a male Advocate or Attorney. No more will be said on this issue.

What is the ideal office location of the Advocate or attorney? Does it have to be in Somerset West?

The location or office of your attorney or Advocate is essential if you wish to consult with them in person. It is also ideal, but not necessary, for their offices to be close to the Court where the divorce would be handled. However, many lawyers make use of correspondent lawyers for this purpose. Furthermore, location should not be an issue if you want a specific lawyer to handle your case. This is so especially seeing that people are making use of virtual meetings.

What level of experience should the Advocate or attorney have?

It is important to remember that not all legal matters require the best lawyer. If your divorce is straightforward, finding the best lawyer in the field is unnecessary. The best may be very busy and lack the time to give your case the attention it deserves. However, if your matter is complicated, then in that case, the most experienced and best lawyer out there is not warranted.

What about the Costs of an Attorney or Advocate?

For many, the costs of the Attorney or Advocate are the most crucial consideration when it comes to enlisting their services. Usually, the more experienced the Attorney or Advocate, the more they would charge. Another aspect that affects costs is the nature of the expertise of the Advocate or Attorney. If the issues in your matter are highly technical and complicated, an Advocate or Attorney with expertise and experience may charge more.

What about the personality of the Advocate or Attorney?

Many may discard the Advocate or Attorney’s personality as not important. However, it is essential to note that it may be time to change lawyers if you do not get along well with the Advocate or Attorney because of their personality. A lawyer and their client would develop a professional relationship in family law matters. This is especially so when the lawyer must discuss many personal issues regarding you, your marriage, children, finance, spouse etc. If you cannot get along well with your Attorney or Advocate, you may not divulge important information relevant to your case.

What is our best advice to a client looking for an Advocate or Attorney in a divorce matter?

Considering all the factors mentioned above, before enlisting the services of an Advocate or Attorney, ensure you enlist the right one. Do not look for the most experience or best, or the top one in family law. You may have to change lawyers if you do so and cannot afford legal bills. Therefore consider the above and any other factors that you may consider necessary when deciding on enlisting the services of an Advocate or an Attorney. Best of luck.

Posted on by Telelaw

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!