Relocation of a minor child from South Africa without the other parent’s consent – Is it possible?

We frequently receive inquiries from parents in South Africa who are considering relocating abroad with their minor child but lack the consent of the other parent. This situation can be complex and arises for various reasons. In some cases, the parent may have lost contact with the other parent and does not know where they are. In other instances, they might be aware of the other parent’s location but choose not to engage with them due to a strained relationship or previous negative experiences. Often, the other parent has not been involved in the child’s life for a significant period.

There is no simple yes or no for relocation without the other parent’s consent

It is essential to understand that decisions regarding relocation cannot be boiled down to a simple “yes” or “no.” Several critical factors must be evaluated before proceeding. For starters, one must determine if there is a court order in place that grants the other parent any form of guardianship rights. If such a court order exists, it could significantly impact the ability to relocate without securing consent. Another consideration is whether the parents are married to each other, and whether the other parents has parental responsibilities and rights of guardianship.

What efforts have you made to locate the other parent?

Additionally, it is crucial to investigate what efforts have been made to locate the other parent. Questions such as whether you have conducted a thorough search and tried to reach out through mutual acquaintances or even sought professional investigation services should be taken into consideration. Furthermore, understanding the reasons why the other parent is absent from the child’s life can provide insight into the potential implications of relocating without their consent. When determining whether the other parent should be informed about the proposed relocation or whether their consent needs to be obtained, the above mentioned factors are vital. If you conclude that the other parent cannot be located and there are no existing legal barriers preventing you from taking your child abroad, then there is generally no reason to stop the relocation from occurring.

Potential challenges when relocating with the minor child without the other parent’s consent

However, potential challenges may arise when it comes to leaving South Africa, particularly if the other parent’s information appears on the child’s birth certificate. Immigration officials or other authorities may raise questions about the absence of the other parent;’s consent, which could complicate the departure process. Furthermore, even after relocation, you may encounter issues surrounding consent for various activities involving your child, such as enrolment in school or medical treatment. Schools, hospitals, and other institutions often require information about the other parent and may ask for their consent, necessitating a clear explanation of your situation.

Other legal complications

Lastly, it is worth considering that the other parent could unexpectedly come forward and contest the relocation. Generally, if the other parent does not possess legal guardianship rights, their ability to dispute your decision may be limited. However, it’s wise to prepare for any potential complications that could arise. Having legal support or advice can be invaluable when navigating these intricate issues to ensure a smooth transition for both you and your child. If you require legal advise on an issue of relocation, or legal assistance, feel free to schedule a consultation with us using the link below:

Posted on 11 February 2025 by Telelaw

Relocation of a minor child from South Africa without the other parent’s consent – Is it possible?

There is no simple yes or no for relocation without the other parent’s consent

What efforts have you made to locate the other parent?

When determining whether the other parent should be informed about the proposed relocation or whether their consent needs to be obtained, the above mentioned factors are vital. If you conclude that the other parent cannot be located and there are no existing legal barriers preventing you from taking your child abroad, then there is generally no reason to stop the relocation from occurring.

Potential challenges when relocating with the minor child without the other parent’s consent

Other legal complications

If you require legal advise on an issue of relocation, or legal assistance, feel free to schedule a consultation with us using the link below:

[embed]https://youtu.be/6OFqAsq8HUE[/embed] Questions posed when registering on www.ourlawyer.co.za/live Question 1: Gauteng

What is the procedure to dispute child maintenance because I am not happy with the maintenance officer’s ruling I want to take the matter back to court for formal enquiry in front of the magistrate?

I have 3 minor kids aged 118 & 6. I have a bond paying 6000 – the officer said I can’t claim for accommodation which I was not happy with because we are not staying for free. Grocery of R3200 electricity R900 municipal water rates and taxes R1200. Domestic Worker 2500 school fees R3030 school transport R1800 medical aid 3060 uniform clothes twice a year. Stationery. House maintenance household expenditure. I want to dispute the order because the officer was baised. The officer told me that I can’t claim for accommodation because its my bond so it’s my problem. The officer said the domestic Worker work at my house. Worst part none of our documents were scrutinised. I felt so frustrated angry and helpless. The officer decided that the father will pay for school fees school transport stationery school uniform and clothes twice a year. I am still doing more and I am earning way less that the father. Atleast is the matter can be taken back for formal enquiry so that they can look at our income expenses and then child’s need. The office took out lots of things from my claim. Accommodation electricity water and rates grocery domestic Worker medical aid and all other expenses household and house maintenance are on me. I want court to re look at this. Please advise me frustrated mother. Question 2: Gauteng My maintenance file spans from December 2010 when I opened a case against my ex-husband at the Randburg Magistrates Court. It is a long involved saga. We tried subeponas a couple of garnishees section 31 section 10 an attachment orderand still he just avoids pays what he feels like if he feels like moves jobs works as a consultant tries to hide his businesses and who he is working with and for. The case started in Randburg then transfered to Pietermaritzburg when we moved there and now is back at the Randburg Courts. I have finally managed to trace his details but feel so despondent because it feels like we are going to just continue in the fight and it will be fruitless. I have 3 children who have suffered through this and I am needing to ask if there is any hope. He is a smooth talker and manages to smooth talk his way through court proceedings even when he doesnt bring his financials. I suspect too that his life partner is also behind hiding financials as she is a financial accountant and has been on scene since the beginning. Not sure where to turn to or how to begin again. Question 3: Gauteng Am i entitled to claim back maintenance? Question 4: KwaZulu-Natal I do not require legal advice. I want to attend the session as I intend to proceed with pupillage in the near future and this is one of the facets that I have a keen interest in. I would like the opportunity to attend this session to gain more knowledge on the topic and to understand how to handle problems of this nature. Question 5: Gauteng I have twin girls turning 15 this Month. their Father had been paying R2500 maintenance for the last 3 years and 1 school fees and helps with School clothes for 1 child – he is supposed to buy them clothing for when he has them for holidays which hasn’t been done over 2 years – I barely can afford to buy them clothing and this holiday I am sending them to him with no much clothing so he is forced to buy for them while they there. He was supposed to get the girls a medical aid which never happened. They have it now because my Job gave that to me as a perk (which I am very grateful for) . My Salary without his maintenance after debt and deductions is only +/- R5000 which I have to buy food/electricity/fuel for my car/pay School Fees. I have asked him to increase it and I am not asking for a ridiculous amount of money but he hasn’t budged. The girls have needs and I feel he needs to play a bigger financial roll then he is. He is married with 2 other children. Beginning of this year he started working overseas. He comes back for 3 Months and goes back. I want to know if he isn’t in the country could his wife be summoned to court on behalf of him? Thank you. Question 6: Gauteng I have a maintenance case we attend our first date than he said I need DNA to make sure that the kids yours DNA date was on 26 of October 2021 I go to court when I drive I found this guy send doctor letter he said I tested positive for COVID 19 but he come to sign our ob book Maintenance court is gonna help me

Posted on 11 February 2025 by Telelaw

Relocation and repatriation of minor children during the South African National lockdown. Is it possible if there is no consent from the other parent?
Many parents before the lockdown had the intention to relocate to another country. It goes without saying that whatever plans they had to relocate at the start of the lockdown, was placed on hold. Having passed day 100 of the national lockdown, things have since changed. Domestic travel has been allowed under certain circumstances and many people have been repatriated to their home countries. International travel, other than that for repatriation is allowed under certain circumstances. We advise those parents who wish to leave South Africa to consult the relevant regulations and the laws applicable to the country you wish to travel when deciding to leave South Africa.
The high unemployment rate in South Africa due to the National Lockdown
Then there is the issue of unemployment. The South African economy is not in good shape, and many businesses have closed due to the lockdown and COVID-19. Many people lost their jobs and various forms of income due to the pandemic. Not being able to work, means not being able to pay for accommodation, food, clothing and school fees, to mention a few. Those people who lost their jobs may wish to seek employment and other economic opportunities abroad. For such parents, relocation may be the best option for them and the child concerned. If repatriation is possible, this option may be better.
Gaudian consent is required for the repatriation or relocation of minor children
But what about those parents who may relocate with their minor children, but does not have the consent of the other parent. What can that parent do under those circumstances? As the law stands, both parents who have parental responsibilities and rights of guardianship must consent for the removal of the minor child from South Africa. A mother naturally has guardianship rights over her child. Father’s, on the other hand, would have full guardianship rights over the child if he was married to the mother or if he materially formed part of the child’s life. If he was just part of the conception of the child, and never married the mother, then he would not have any guardianship rights.
If no consent is obtained, then the Court should be approached
If a parent, wishes to relocate overseas, or repatriate with a minor child, and the other parent does not want to consent thereto, then the Court must be approached for the necessary consent. At the end of the day, the court would decide and look at what is in the child’s best interests. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, this factor would now also be considered. The court would have to consider the state of the pandemic in South Africa, as well as the country to which the parent wishes to relocate, with a range of the usual factors.
Legal Articles on the relocation of minor children
Have a look at the following articles on the issue of relocation of minor children. Passport Application of a Minor Child and Consent – Department of Home Affairs Consent for a minor child for relocation and passport application Frequently asked questions regarding relocation and consent when it comes to minor children I want to relocate with my minor child. what do I need to know with regard to the law? We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws

Posted on 11 February 2025 by Telelaw

Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf: The Unwavering Ally in the Appeals Process

The legal landscape can be a challenging terrain, especially for those who have faced unfair treatment in court and suffered the disappointment of a lost case. However, when it comes to appealing this outcome, the path to justice can be navigated with certainty and strength, especially with the expert guidance of Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf. A fighter for rights he is unwavering in his commitment to securing justice for his clients.

Demystifying the Appeals Process

Understanding the appeals process is crucial for anyone considering an appeal. It is important to note that an appeal is not a mere reiteration of the original trial; it is a powerful challenge to the decision rendered by a lower court. The appellate court meticulously reviews the trial proceedings to identify significant legal errors that influenced the outcome. With Advocate Abduroaf by your side, you can approach this process with confidence, knowing you have an expert who understands the intricacies of appellate law.

Rigorous Case Review

When you enlist Advocate Abduroaf’s services, the first step is a comprehensive review of your original case. This isn’t just a cursory glance—it’s an in-depth examination of court transcripts, evidence, and legal arguments. Advocate Abduroaf identifies precise grounds for appeal, whether they involve misapplication of the law, procedural irregularities, or issues with the sufficiency of evidence. His sharp analytical skills will illuminate critical points that could turn the tide in your favor.

Crafting a Compelling Appeal

With the foundation laid, Advocate Abduroaf expertly handles the creation of the appeal itself. The notice of appeal is not just a formality; it must be meticulously crafted to include specific decisions, grounds for appeal, and desired outcomes. Advocate Abduroaf specializes in drafting documents that seize attention and assert a compelling case for reconsideration. His ability to distill complex legal arguments into clear, impactful writing serves as a powerful tool in persuading the appellate court.

Leveraging Legal Research and Precedents

Success in appeals often hinges on establishing a robust legal framework. Advocate Abduroaf employs a comprehensive approach to research that digs deep into relevant case law and annotations. By integrating precedents that echo your situation, he builds a formidable foundation for your appeal. This level of preparation not only strengthens your case but also reflects Advocate Abduroaf’s authoritative grasp of the law—something that resonates with appellate judges.

Expert Representation in Court

The culmination of the appeals process often leads to a critical hearing, and this is where Advocate Abduroaf shines as an exceptional oral advocate. With unparalleled confidence and poise, he presents your case before the appellate judges. His sharp intellect allows him to navigate complex questions, effectively counter opposing arguments, and communicate your position with clarity and conviction. Having Advocate Abduroaf in your corner means fighting with a seasoned warrior prepared to defend your rights at every turn.

Providing Constant Support

Appealing a case is not only a legal challenge; it is also an emotional journey. Advocate Abduroaf understands the pressures involved and offers steadfast support and guidance throughout the entire process. He fosters open communication and ensures you remain informed and engaged, cultivating an empowering partnership that allows you to face the legal battle head-on.

Navigating Legal Complexities with Precision

The appellate process is inherently complex, filled with stringent deadlines and procedural requirements that must be meticulously followed. Advocate Abduroaf’s breadth of experience means he knows these intricacies inside and out. He ensures that every filing is executed accurately and on time, thereby eliminating potential traps that could jeopardize your appeal. Anticipating obstacles and devising strategies to mitigate them is an integral part of his approach, keeping your case on the path to success.

Final Thoughts

In summary, Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf stands as an unwavering ally in the pursuit of justice through the appeals process. His relentless dedication, tactical acumen, and expert representation ensure a formidable challenge against any unjust court ruling. Choosing the right advocate is critical for the success of your appeal, and Advocate Abduroaf’s track record speaks volumes about his ability to achieve favorable outcomes. If you’ve faced injustice, aligning yourself with Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf could very well be your strongest move in reclaiming your rights and obtaining the justice you deserve. The path may be challenging, but with him by your side, you can pursue it with confidence and determination.

How to appeal to the Constitutional Court – Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf

A case usually commences from the Magistrate’s or High Court. If a party to the proceedings is unhappy with the outcome of the Magistrate’s Court decision, he or she will then proceed to appeal to the High Court. If, however, a case has been heard in the High Court, the Appeal would either be heard by a full-bench (usually two judges) in the High Court or the Supreme Court of Appeal would hear it. Once the Supreme Court of Appeal heard the matter and made a ruling, that would usually end it. However, a further appeal may be made to the Constitutional Court if the matter relates to constitutional rights. This Article deals with appeals to the Constitutional Court of South Africa, which has its seat in Braamfontein. Please note that although this article does not deal with it, it is also possible to make a direct application to the Constitutional Court, asking it to sit as a court of first and last instance because of the urgency of the matter or when allowed in terms of the Constitution as can be seen below. According to the website of the Constitutional Court, the contact details of the Constitutional Court is: Court Offices Director of the Constitutional Court: Tel: +27 11 359-7459 Email: [email protected] General office: of the Constitutional Court (Registrar ): Tel: +27 11 359-7468 / 7460 / 7465 / 7592 Email: [email protected]

What is a Court Appeal?

An appeal is the legal process by which a party requests a formal change to an official decision. This process usually takes place after a party is dissatisfied with a ruling made by a lower court. Appeals are made to a higher court with the intention of reviewing and potentially overturning the lower court’s decision. The purpose of an appeal is to ensure that justice is served by providing a mechanism for correcting errors made by lower courts, thereby upholding the integrity of the judicial process. Therefore, if a party is not happy with the decision of the High Court or the Supreme Court of Appeal regarding a constitutional matter, he or she would then appeal to the Constitutional Court.

The South African Court System

Section 166 of our Constitution (Act 108 or 1996) deals with our Judicial System. It states the following: Judicial system

The courts are—

(a) the Constitutional Court; (b) the Supreme Court of Appeal; (c) the High Court of South Africa, and any high court of appeal that may be established by an Act of Parliament to hear appeals from any court of a status similar to the High Court of South Africa; (d) the Magistrates’ Courts; and (e) any other court established or recognised in terms of an Act of Parliament, including any court of a status similar to either the High Court of South Africa or the Magistrates’ Courts. You will note that the Constitution places the Constitutional Court on top of the list, followed by the Supreme Court of Appeal, the High Court and the Magistrate’s Court. Seeing that this article deals with appeals to the Constitutional Court, for the sake of completeness, let us deal with the composition of the Constitutional Court. Section 167 of our Constitution states: Constitutional Court

(1) The Constitutional Court consists of the Chief Justice of South Africa, the Deputy Chief Justice and nine other judges.

(2) A matter before the Constitutional Court must be heard by at least eight judges. (3) The Constitutional Court— (a) is the highest court of the Republic; and (b) may decide— (i) constitutional matters; and (ii) any other matter, if the Constitutional Court grants leave to appeal on the grounds that the matter raises an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by that Court, and (c) makes the final decision whether a matter is within its jurisdiction. (4) Only the Constitutional Court may— (a) decide disputes between organs of state in the national or provincial sphere concerning the constitutional status, powers or functions of any of those organs of state; (b) decide on the constitutionality of any parliamentary or provincial Bill, but may do so only in the circumstances anticipated in section 79 or 121; (c) decide applications envisaged in section 80 or 122; (d) decide on the constitutionality of any amendment to the Constitution; (e) decide that Parliament or the President has failed to fulfil a constitutional obligation; or (f) certify a provincial constitution in terms of section 144. (5) The Constitutional Court makes the final decision whether an Act of Parliament, a provincial Act or conduct of the President is constitutional, and must confirm any order of invalidity made by the Supreme Court of Appeal, the High Court of South Africa, or a court of similar status, before that order has any force. (6) National legislation or the rules of the Constitutional Court must allow a person, when it is in the interests of justice and with leave of the Constitutional Court— (a) to bring a matter directly to the Constitutional Court; or (b) to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court from any other court. (7) A constitutional matter includes any issue involving the interpretation, protection or enforcement of the Constitution. We don’t want to go into too much detail, but it is clear that the Constitutional Court is a specialist court dealing with constitutional matters, law important to the public, and issues regarding the government, as outlined above. Any decision that invalidates provincial or parliamentary legislation or any conduct of the President must be confirmed by the Constitutional Court before it has any effect.

How do you appeal to the Constitutional Court?

If your matter relates to an issue that falls within the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court, you may appeal to it. If the Constitutional Court agrees with you, it will make a ruling in your favour. The first step would be to make the application to the Constitutional Court. Please note that the Constitutional Court has the discretion whether or not to hear a matter. An exception is where an Act of Parliament has already been declared invalid, but another Court, and the Constitutional Court is required to confirm the finding.

Rules of the Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court has its own rules. One should consult these rules when litigating in the Constitutional Court. Relevant to this article is Rule 19, which deals with appeal process in the Constitutional Court. It states the following: 19. Appeals (1) The procedure set out in this rule shall be followed in an application for leave to appeal to the Court where a decision on a constitutional matter, other than an order of constitutional invalidity under section 172(2)(a) of the Constitution, has been given by any court including the Supreme Court of Appeal, and irrespective of whether the President has refused leave or special leave to appeal. (2) A litigant who is aggrieved by the decision of a court and who wishes to appeal against it directly to the Court on a constitutional matter shall, within 15 days of the order against which the appeal is sought to be brought and after giving notice to the other party or parties concerned, lodge with the Registrar an application for leave to appeal: Provided that where the President has refused leave to appeal the period prescribed in this rule shall run from the date of the order refusing leave. (3) An application referred to in subrule (2) shall be signed by the applicant or his or her legal representative and shall contain— (a) the decision against which the appeal is brought and the grounds upon which such decision is disputed; (b) a statement setting out clearly and succinctly the constitutional matter raised in the decision; and any other issues including issues that are alleged to be connected with a decision on the constitutional matter; (c) such supplementary information or argument as the applicant considers necessary to bring to the attention of the Court; and (d) a statement indicating whether the applicant has applied or intends to apply for leave or special leave to appeal to any other court, and if so— (i) which court; (ii) whether such application is conditional upon the application to the Court being refused; and (iii) the outcome of such application, if known at the time of the application to the Court. (4) (a) Within 10 days from the date upon which an application referred to in subrule (2) is lodged, the respondent or respondents may respond thereto in writing, indicating whether or not the application for leave to appeal is being opposed, and if so the grounds for such opposition. (b) The response shall be signed by the respondent or respondents or his or her or their legal representative. (5) (a) A respondent or respondents wishing to lodge a cross-appeal to the Court on a constitutional matter shall, within 10 days from the date upon which an application in subrule (2) is lodged, lodge with the Registrar an application for leave to cross-appeal. (b) The provisions of these rules with regard to appeals shall apply, with necessary modifications, to cross-appeals. (6) (a) The Court shall decide whether or not to grant the appellant leave to appeal. (b) Applications for leave to appeal may be dealt with summarily, without receiving oral or written argument other than that contained in the application itself. (c) The Court may order that the application for leave to appeal be set down for argument and direct that the written argument of the parties deal not only with the question whether the application for leave to appeal should be granted, but also with the merits of the dispute. The provisions of rule 20 shall, with necessary modifications, apply to the procedure to be followed in such procedures.

Procedure on appeal

Section 20 of the Constitutional Court’s Rules deals with the procedure on appeal. It is states:

Procedure on appeal

(1) If leave to appeal is given in terms of rule 19, the appellant shall note and prosecute the appeal as follows— (a) The appellant shall prepare and lodge the appeal record with the Registrar within such time as may be fixed by the Chief Justice in directions. (b) Subject to the provisions of subrule (1)(c) below, the appeal record shall consist of the judgment of the court from which the appeal is noted, together with all the documentation lodged by the parties in that court and all the evidence which may have been led in the proceedings and which may be relevant to the issues that are to be determined. (c) (i) The parties shall endeavour to reach agreement on what should be included in the record and, in the absence of such agreement, the appellant shall apply to the Chief Justice for directions to be given in regard to the compilation of the record. (ii) Such application shall be made in writing and shall set out the nature of the dispute between the parties in regard to the compilation of the record and the reasons for the appellant’s contentions. (iii) The respondent may respond to the application within 10 days of being served with the application and shall set out the reasons for the respondent’s contentions. (iv) The Chief Justice may assign the application to one or more judges, who may deal with the matter on the papers or require the parties to appear before him or her or them on a specified day and at a specified time to debate the compilation of the record. (v) The judge or judges concerned shall give directions in regard to the compilation of the record, the time within which the record is to be lodged with the Registrar and any other matters which may be deemed by him or her or them to be necessary for the purpose of enabling the Court to deal with the appeal, which directions may include that the matter be referred back to the court a quo for the hearing of additional evidence specified in the directions, or that additional evidence be put before the Court by way of affidavit or otherwise for the purpose of the appeal. (2) (a) One of the copies of the record lodged with the Registrar shall be certified as correct by the Registrar of the court appealed from. (b) Copies of the record shall be clearly typed on stout A4-size paper, double-spaced in black record ink, on one side of the paper only. (c) Legible documents that were typed or printed in their original form such as cheques and the like shall not be retyped and clear photocopies on A4-size paper shall be provided instead. (d) The pages shall be numbered clearly and consecutively and every tenth line on each page shall be numbered and the pagination used in the court a quo shall be retained where possible. (e) Bulky records shall be divided into separate conveniently-sized volumes of approximately 100 pages each. The record shall be securely bound in book format to withstand constant use and shall be so bound that upon being used will lie open without manual or other restraint. (f) All records shall be securely bound in suitable covers disclosing the case number, names of the parties, the volume number and the numbers of the pages contained in that volume, the total number of volumes, the court a quo and the names of the attorneys of the parties. (g) The binding required by this rule shall be sufficiently secure to ensure the stability of the papers contained within the volume; and where the record consists of more than one volume, the number of each volume and the number of the pages contained in a volume shall appear on the upper third of the spine of the volume. (h) Where documents are lodged with the Registrar, and such documents are recorded on a computer disk, the party lodging the document shall where possible also make available to the Registrar a disk containing the file in which the document is contained, or transmit an electronic copy of the document concerned by e-mail in a format determined by the Registrar which is compatible with software that is used by the Court at the time of lodgement, to the Registrar at: [email protected]: Provided that the transmission of such copy shall not relieve the party concerned from the obligation under rule 1(3) to lodge the prescribed number of hard copies of the documents so lodged. (i) If a disk is made available to the Registrar the file will be copied and the disk will be returned to the party concerned. Where a disk or an electronic copy of a document other than a record is provided, the party need lodge only 13 copies of the document concerned with the Registrar. (3) If a record has been lodged in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of subrule (1), the Registrar shall cause a notice to be given to the parties to the appeal requiring— (a) the appellant to lodge with the Registrar written argument in support of the appeal within a period determined by the Chief Justice and specified in such notice; and (b) the respondent to lodge with the Registrar written argument in reply to the appellant’s argument by a specified date determined by the Chief Justice, which shall be subsequent to the date on which the appellant’s argument was served on the respondent. (4) The appellant may lodge with the Registrar written argument in answer to the respondent’s argument within 10 days from the date on which the respondent’s argument was served on the appellant. (5) The Chief Justice may decide whether the appeal shall be dealt with on the basis of written arguments only. (6) Subject to the provisions of subrule (5), the Chief Justice shall determine the date on which oral argument will be heard, and the Registrar shall within five days of such determination notify all parties to the appeal of the date of the hearing by registered post or facsimile.

What are the Steps:

Within 15 days of the Order you are appealing against, lodged you Application for leave to appeal [Rule 19(2)]
Within 10 days, the Respondent is to file its Notice to Oppose the appeal and the grounds for the opposition [Rule 19(4)(a)]
The Constitutional Court would then decide whether or not to grant the leave to Appeal [Rule 19(6)(a)]
If leave to appeal is granted, the appellant shall prepare and lodge the appeal record with the Registrar [Rule 20(1)(a)]
The Chief Justice may decide whether the appeal shall be dealt with on the basis of written arguments only [Rule 20(5)]
The matter would be argued on the date provided by the Constitutional Court.