IN   THE   HIGH   COURT OF SOUTH   AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) CASE NO:                                /2024 In the matter between: KONRAD JOSEPH SCHÜLER                                                                                      (Applicant) Identity number: 590504 5229 08 0 and VANESSA GAIL SCHÜLER                                                                                         (Respondent) Identity number: 600904 0208 08 9   NOTICE OF MOTION   TAKE NOTICE that the Applicant intends to make an Application to the above Honourable Court for an Order in the following terms:
  1. The Applicant’s non-compliance with the requirements of forms, service, manner of service and time periods provided in the Uniform Rules of this Honorable Court be condoned insofar as necessary;
  2. Prior to any proceeds of the sale of portion 19,346, Koppersfontein, Western Cape (the property), being paid to the Respondent:
    • the Transferring Attorneys shall retain the sum equal to the outstanding debt of the former joint estate of the parties referred to in clause 3.1.3 of the Consent Paper (the debt), which was made an Order of the Regional Court for the Regional Division of the Western Cape, held in Cape Town, on 24 October 2023, under case number 165/2023 (the divorce Order) and utilise it to settle the debt;
    • The Transferring Attorneys shall retain an amount equal to the sum of all payments made by the Applicant and/or debited from his Standard Bank Account calculated from 01 November 2023, which was used to pay the Respondent’s half of the debt, and reimburse the Applicant therewith on behalf of the Respondent;
  3. The motor vehicle referred to in clause 4.1.2 of the Divorce Order, being a 2011 Hyundai Ix35 2.0 Gls/Executive, with registration number CAA 412805, shall be retained by the Applicant as his sole and exclusive property for which right the Applicant shall forthwith pay the Respondent the sum of R 3 661 (three thousand six hundred and sixty-one rand); and
  4. Costs of this Application; and
  5. Further and/or alternative relief.
  TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the Applicant has appointed the firm ADVOCATE MUHAMMAD ABDUROAF, with its details as stated below as his/her Legal Practitioner of record and address at which he/she shall accept notice and service of all process in these proceedings. KINDLY TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that if you intend opposing the Application, you are required to:
  • inform the Applicant’s Legal Practitioner within 10 (ten) days of receipt hereof of your intention to do so; and
  • fifteen days after you have so given notice of your intention to oppose the Application, to file your answering affidavit, if any; and further;
  • that you are required to appoint in such notification an address referred to in rule 6 (5) (b) at which you will accept notice and service of all documents in these proceedings.
KINDLY BE ADVISED FURTHER, that if no such notice of intention to oppose is given, the Application will be made on a date and time to be provided by the Registrar of this Honourable Court. TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the Founding Affidavit of KONRAD JOSEPH SCHÜLER will be used in support of this Application. TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the Applicant consent to service of any process in these proceedings via email using the email address [email protected]  DATED AT CAPE TOWN ON THIS      DAY OF JANUARY 2024.   _______________________________ Per: Adv. M Abduroaf (Legal Practitioner of the Applicant) Trust Account Advocate – An advocate as contemplated in section 34(2)(b) of the Legal Practice Act, 28 of 2014 (the Act) Chambers.: The Pinnacle | Suite 702, 7th Floor Corner Strand, Burg & Castle Streets | Cape Town, 8001 Tel.: +2721 111 0090 Email.: [email protected] (Email Service) High Court Box 115 Ref.: M22081/Schüler   To:           THE HONOURABLE REGISTRAR OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CAPE TOWN     And to:    VANESSA GAIL SCHÜLER      (Respondent) Ruby Estate, Gems 5 Unit 4, Burgundy Estate CAPE TOWN ________________________O0O___________________      

IN   THE   HIGH   COURT OF SOUTH   AFRICA

(WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)

CASE NO:                                /2024

In the matter between:

KONRAD JOSEPH SCHÜLER                                                                                      (Applicant)

Identity number: 590504 5229 08 0

and

VANESSA GAIL SCHÜLER                                                                                         (Respondent)

Identity number: 600904 0208 08 9

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

TAKE NOTICE that the Applicant intends to make an Application to the above Honourable Court for an Order in the following terms:

  1. The Applicant’s non-compliance with the requirements of forms, service, manner of service and time periods provided in the Uniform Rules of this Honorable Court be condoned insofar as necessary;
  2. Prior to any proceeds of the sale of portion 19,346, Koppersfontein, Western Cape (the property), being paid to the Respondent:
    • the Transferring Attorneys shall retain the sum equal to the outstanding debt of the former joint estate of the parties referred to in clause 3.1.3 of the Consent Paper (the debt), which was made an Order of the Regional Court for the Regional Division of the Western Cape, held in Cape Town, on 24 October 2023, under case number 165/2023 (the divorce Order) and utilise it to settle the debt;
    • The Transferring Attorneys shall retain an amount equal to the sum of all payments made by the Applicant and/or debited from his Standard Bank Account calculated from 01 November 2023, which was used to pay the Respondent’s half of the debt, and reimburse the Applicant therewith on behalf of the Respondent;
  3. The motor vehicle referred to in clause 4.1.2 of the Divorce Order, being a 2011 Hyundai Ix35 2.0 Gls/Executive, with registration number CAA 412805, shall be retained by the Applicant as his sole and exclusive property for which right the Applicant shall forthwith pay the Respondent the sum of R 3 661 (three thousand six hundred and sixty-one rand); and
  4. Costs of this Application; and
  5. Further and/or alternative relief.

 

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the Applicant has appointed the firm ADVOCATE MUHAMMAD ABDUROAF, with its details as stated below as his/her Legal Practitioner of record and address at which he/she shall accept notice and service of all process in these proceedings.

KINDLY TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that if you intend opposing the Application, you are required to:

  • inform the Applicant’s Legal Practitioner within 10 (ten) days of receipt hereof of your intention to do so; and
  • fifteen days after you have so given notice of your intention to oppose the Application, to file your answering affidavit, if any; and further;
  • that you are required to appoint in such notification an address referred to in rule 6 (5) (b) at which you will accept notice and service of all documents in these proceedings.

KINDLY BE ADVISED FURTHER, that if no such notice of intention to oppose is given, the Application will be made on a date and time to be provided by the Registrar of this Honourable Court.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the Founding Affidavit of KONRAD JOSEPH SCHÜLER will be used in support of this Application.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the Applicant consent to service of any process in these proceedings via email using the email address [email protected] 

DATED AT CAPE TOWN ON THIS      DAY OF JANUARY 2024.

 

_______________________________

Per: Adv. M Abduroaf

(Legal Practitioner of the Applicant)

Trust Account Advocate – An advocate as contemplated in section 34(2)(b) of the Legal Practice Act, 28 of 2014 (the Act)

Chambers.: The Pinnacle | Suite 702, 7th Floor Corner Strand, Burg & Castle Streets | Cape Town, 8001

Tel.: +2721 111 0090

Email.: [email protected] (Email Service)

High Court Box 115

Ref.: M22081/Schüler

 

To:           THE HONOURABLE REGISTRAR OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT

HIGH COURT

CAPE TOWN

 

 

And to:    VANESSA GAIL SCHÜLER     

(Respondent)

Ruby Estate, Gems 5

Unit 4, Burgundy Estate

CAPE TOWN

________________________O0O___________________

 

 

 

Related Post

Appealing a Maintenance Court Decision or Judgment

In its very nature, maintenance matters are complicated and never straight forward. For starters, it deals with the income and expenditure of both parents and the needs of the child. It is not easy for a maintenance court to determine with a high degree of certainty what the true income of a self-employed parent is. The same applies to the true expenses of a parent.
advice-child-maintenance-child-custody-divorce

Manipulating the maintenance system

It is very easy for a parent to manipulate documentation or only present information which he or she believes would be in their favor. For example, if a parent earns extra income by selling clothing, he or she may decide not to disclose that information to the maintenance Court.  By doing so, the Maintenance Court will determine the maintenance of the child based on the incorrect facts presented. This could become more problematic when one parent knows of the other parent’s additional income but cannot prove it. If the parties have legal representatives, this issue of improper disclosure is limited to a certain extent. For example, lawyers would be in a good position to do their own investigations and verify certain relevant information.

Improper disclosure of expenses

Then there is the issue of the expenses of the child. The court requires a proper outline of all the monthly, daily and yearly expenditure of the child. Without all the relevant information before it, the court is not in a proper position to make a fair decision regarding child maintenance.  This is so as the amount of maintenance a parent should pay is directly determined by what is the child’s monthly expenditure. For example, if a parent earns a million rand a month, his or her maintenance contributions can be no more than what the child actually cost per month.

Intentionally inflating expenses

It often happens that a parent cannot, or do not provide a true reflection as to what the child actually cost. Amounts are inflated, and there is no way that the court or the other parent can really question those amounts. Let’s say the mother is taking the father to the Maintenance Court but the father only sees the child once a month.  The father, in this case, would not be able to confirm or verify whether or not the child actually eats as much as the mother makes it out to be. And many times, parents come to court with an attitude of “let me claim more and the court will give me less.”

Unhappy with the maintenance magistrate’s decision

advice-child-maintenance-child-custody-divorceLet’s say a maintenance enquiry was held by a maintenance magistrate, and a decision was handed down. Should both parents be happy with the decision of the magistrate, their lives can continue and the party who should pay maintenance should comply with the order. However, it often happens that one parent is not happy with the maintenance order. We often get queries where parents want to know what they can do when the maintenance Court did not find in their favor. Sometimes parents feel that the Maintenance Court was one-sided. In such a case he or she wants the decision of the magistrate to be relooked at. In order for this to happen, the Parent should appeal the decision of the magistrate.

Appealing a maintenance Court decision

The purpose of this article is not to explain the technical procedure of appealing a magistrate’s judgment.  The procedure is a bit complicated and we suggest you make use of a legal practitioner to assist you should you wish to appeal a decision.  However, what we want to bring home is that it is possible for the decision of a Maintenance Court to be relooked at by a higher Court and provide you with some insight as to what happens. The higher Court, in this case, will be the High Court.  If you reside in Cape Town, it is the Western Cape High Court.

What happens at the Appeal Court?

Let’s say all the court rules and procedures were complied with and the matter is now before the Appeal Court. The Appeal Court will comprise of two judges. They would have read through the entire court record in the Magistrate’s Court before the matter is heard. Taking it one step back, all proceedings in the magistrate’s court is digitally recorded. So, when you decide to appeal a decision of the magistrate’s court the recordings are sent to an authorised typist, who would type out the entire Court record. You cannot type out the record yourself.

advice-child-maintenance-child-custody-divorceHeads of Argument

Now before you argue your case at the Appeal Court you would want the judges to first know what your arguments are.  At the same time, you would like to know what the other lawyer’s arguments are. In this regard, you would file heads of argument a few weeks before the appeal hearing date. Basically, you will outline what points you will be focusing on, and what law you will be relying on.

You need to convince the Appeal Court there was an error

Your purpose at the appeal is to try to convince the judges that the magistrate erred in his or her decision. In other words, made a mistake.  In relation to a maintenance Court matter, you may even wish to convince the court that the maintenance officer did not follow the procedures outlined in the Maintenance Act or he or she did not properly investigate the maintenance complaint.  For example, the maintenance officer just took the father’s word when he said he was unemployed. Or the mother’s word when she said she earns no additional income.

Incorrect maintenance investigation

Had the maintenance officer done some further investigations by requesting relevant information, or instructing the maintenance investigator, the true facts would have been before the Maintenance Court. In other words, the magistrate would have made a different decision. Now, this would apply to a maintenance Court where the provisions in-place in the Maintenance Act was not followed. If this happened, you may appeal.

The magistrate’s reasons for his or her decision

The High Court judges would have the magistrate’s reasons for his decision before them. In other words, the magistrate would provide a document to the appeals court where he or she explains why he or she made a certain decision in the Maintenance Court matter.  He or she may, for example, say that based upon the evidence presented, the father earned an amount which does not justify him paying more than what he is currently paying.  Or the maintenance magistrate might say that based upon all the evidence presented, he could not find any information that will justify an amount greater than what the father is currently paying. The appeal Court would look at all these reasons and the evidence that was presented at court. It would listen to the arguments of the legal representatives and determine whether or not the magistrate made an error in judgment.

The appeals court’s decision

advice-child-maintenance-child-custody-divorceIf it is decided that the magistrate made an error in judgment, the court would in those circumstances change the order or refer the matter back to the maintenance court for a proper enquiry.  If the court decides that the magistrate was correct in its judgment, it will dismiss the appeal. So in short if you are dissatisfied with a maintenance magistrates court decision, you have full right to appeal it.      

[caption id="attachment_5575" align="alignleft" width="300"]National Water Day Cape Town South Africa - Water Crises National Water Day – Cape Town South Africa – Water Crisis[/caption]

World Water Day

Yesterday (22 March 2018) was World Water Day. A day where the focus is on the importance of water and raising awareness on the issues surrounding it. The residence of the Western Cape, South Africa all to well know of the scarcity of water, as in the last few years, water has become in less supply and expensive. Dam levels have declined compared to previous years, and at the time of writing this article, there has been no substantial amount of rainfall positively predicted for the coming winter season. What this tells us, is that both government and civil society need to work together to alleviate the water crisis in South Africa. This can be done by better water management and drilling into alternative sources of fresh water, to mention a few. Clearly some businesses have benefited from the crisis. People are purchasing bottled water in its gallons and the sale of 25 litre containers has sky rocketed. Almost every household owns a few containers. Then there is the Jojo tanks residence purchased and used to catch and store rain water, and water from water sources. All these costs money to the ratepayer. As Our Lawyer (Pty) Ltd is based in Cape Town, we felt it fitting to use our legal expertise to write something on the water crisis in celebration of World Water Day. We too are feeling the crisis in our office building where water saving measures are in place.

Cape Town Water Crisis

The water crisis in Cape Town is therefore clearly a real issue affecting not only its residents, but industry alike. Currently Cape Town is facing level 6B water restrictions, which allows its residence less than 50 litres of water usage a day. This has been the case for the past few months. Prior to that, the quota per person was in the region of 85 litres of water usage a day. With these restrictions, comes higher water costs in that, the more you use, the more you would pay as compared to periods before level 6B. This could be compared to the “polluter pays” principle when it comes to pollution. [caption id="attachment_5573" align="alignleft" width="300"]Water Quota Level 25 L Crises Water Quota at Newlands Springs Cape Town[/caption]

Water Outages and Problems

As with the electricity crisis not too long ago, Cape Town is now experiencing water outages. And in some areas, more than others. Certain areas experience blue coloured water coming from their taps, which may not be potable. Then there is the issue of the controversial water meters being installed for homes across Cape Town. In some areas, the communities opposed its installations citing faulty devices as a reason. When the device fails, residence is left without water until it is repaired, and sometimes not soon enough. This can be particularly annoying as the devices comes at a cost to the ratepayer. No matter how you look at it, water is still a vital resource on any level. We need it for our daily living. Industry requires it for their growth. And farms require it to ensure that there is food on our tables. But where does this leave us going forward? As can be seen, clearly there is a crisis, and costing us. Is there light at the end of the tunnel, or water at the bottom of the pit?

A right to water in South Africa

South Africa is an arid country with a small percentage of its rainfall available as surface water. It further has one of the lowest conversion ratios in the world. Each time we lose a water resource due to pollution or to poor conservation, we are driven closer to ‘water resource extinction’. It is therefore critically concerning that many of the Western Cape’s rivers are heavily polluted.

What does our Constitution say?

Section 24 of our country’s constitution states that “everyone has the right to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being.” The same section further states that “the environment is to be protected, for the benefit of present and future generations, through reasonable legislative and other measures that prevent pollution and ecological degradation; promote conservation; and secure ecologically sustainable development and use of natural resources while promoting justifiable economic and social development. Furthermore, section 27 of our Constitution states that “everyone has the right to have access to sufficient water.”

Alternative Sources of Water in Cape Town

Cape Town has now bought into the idea of desalination. There are currently three desalination plants in Cape Town, hoping to be up and running in a few weeks’ time. This however would not supply Cape Town with all its needed water should it be fully up and running. Then there is the issue of borehole water. Many residences and businesses have invested in drilling boreholes. This however comes at a cost and the water is not drinkable. It seems whatever the alternative sources are, it would cost the user a pretty penny. [caption id="attachment_5572" align="alignleft" width="300"]Water Crises Cape Town Newlands Springs Water Crisis Cape Town Newlands Springs[/caption]

Spring Water

The South African Breweries has a spring water collection point in Newlands Cape Town open to the public. Here residence may collect their water. There is also another collection point a few minutes’ walk away. With only five taps, and long queues, even being open twenty-four hours a day, would not support the entire Cape Town population. People may find it easier to just purchase water from the store. There are quite a few springs in Cape Town, but not all of them are open to the public. You will find people queuing in Muizenberg or collecting the water coming from the Mountain on Boyes Drive. Be that as it may, it would be clearly impracticable for a household of five people to collect their free water from springs, to alleviate a huge water bill. People work, and there are costs involved in transporting the water.

The way forward

[caption id="attachment_5574" align="alignleft" width="213"]Water Bottles Cape Town Crises Shortage 25 LWater Containers being filled.[/caption] Without pointing fingers, it is clear that something has gone wrong with regard to water management in the Western Cape. How can things change so quick? But we are where we are, and now with our eyes open. We cannot depend on government solely anymore to save us, we need to take positive action. If this means installing water saving devices, collecting water, or drilling boreholes; that is what we must do. In any event, our pockets will feel it. We wish the City success with their water desalination venture, and making use of groundwater, and truly wish the Winter season will fill up our dams. However, we all need to have systems and contingencies in place, as this crisis is one that may be around for some time. For environmental legal services, visit Envirolaws (Pty) Ltd. Happy World Water Day! The Our lawyer (Pty) Ltd Legal Team