History of the law of exercising contact and care rights of parents during the lockdown in South Africa – The rollercoaster ride for parents and lawyers

The national lockdown not only affected our movement by keeping us in our homes. It also affected our relationships with people important and dearest in our lives. Here we refer to family, friends and colleagues to mention a few. Before the lockdown commenced in South Africa, parents were exercising contact with their children as they always have in the past. Friends and family gatherings were not seen as a privilege but as part of daily life, and an inherent right. However, when the lockdown commenced, things drastically changed. And without warning.

The following are a few of the actual consequences of the lockdown when it comes to family relations:

  • Spouses or partners who would only see each other for part of the day, now see each other virtually the entire day;
  • Schools are closed, and parents can only care for children at their homes;
  • Children were not allowed to move between parents as they were used to at the start of the lockdown;
  • Visits to close friends and your relatives are prohibited. Therefore, adult children may not have seen their parents since the lockdown commenced.
  • Siblings, cousins and spouses living in different provinces would not have seen each other for weeks.

The commencement of the National Lockdown in South Africa

The date 27 March 2020, is of great significance to all South Africans. It is the day were all South African’s were placed under lockdown. This was something no South African was prepared for. The call was imminent. The life we lived before that day, would not be lived for quite some time to come. Now let us look at the regulations dealing with the movement of children during the lockdown.

First Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

Regulations were then issued concerning the movement of children. In terms of the Regulations at the time, minor children were to remain in the care of the parent who had the child at the time. Have a look at an article written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf on this issue: “The child must remain in the custody of the parent with whom the child was with when the lockdown period started” – Directive 6(m)(ii) in terms of the Regulations [30 March 2020] This caused huge challenges for many parents. It meant that a parent who never cared for a child for longer than a day would now have to care for the child for the entire lockdown period. This also caused a huge stir. Not only for parents but also for the legal profession, especially for a lawyer who specialises in family law.

Second set of Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

The Regulations then changed, allowing movement as long as you have a registered parenting plan, or a parental rights and responsibilities agreement, both registered with the Office of the Family Advocate, or an Order of Court. This was also problematic as parents who did not have the latter documents could not have contact with their minor children. Have a look at an article written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf on this issue entitled: New lockdown regulations regarding the movement of children – Certain Parents may move children during the National Lockdown period No equality and dignity for parents without Court Order and Registered Plans and Agreements  

Third set of Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

Then the regulations were again changed. It further allowed for the movement of children of parents who do not have a registered parenting plan, or a registered parental rights and responsibilities agreement or an Order of the Court. They may move from one home to another to collect and return their minor child with one requirement. They must have in their possession the birth certificate of the child, or a certified copy thereof. Have a look at an article written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf on this issue entitled: Latest Regulations: No Court order, registered agreement or parenting plan is required for the movement of children during the lockdown – 16 April 2020.

Fourth set of Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

Then came the recent regulations which have been issued after the extended lockdown in May 2020. In essence, parents may move with their child if they have a registered parenting plan, or a parental rights and responsibilities agreement or an Order of the Court. Another requirement was that the home the child is to move to is free from COVID-19. You will note that the birth certificate requirement for the parents who do not have the latter documents no longer applies. If parents do not have a registered parenting plan, or a registered parental rights and responsibilities agreement or an Order of the Court, they may collect and drop-off the child only after they obtained a Magistrate’s Permit. A parent who has rights of contact needs to approach the magistrate in the area where he or she lives to obtain a permit to move the child. Have a look at these two posts on the topic. The Magistrate’s Permit – 3 steps to obtain your permit to collect your child during lockdown The Magistrate’s Permit – New regulations on Movement of children during the Lockdown It should be noted that the permit does not give you rights of care and contact. It only allows you to move the child. So, if the police stop you, you can show them the permit. If you and the other parent have disputes regarding contact, you cannot use the permit as a way of enforcing contact. That must be resolved at a court of law. Therefore, if you visit the child to collect him with a permit, and the other parent refuses you contact, you still need to approach the relevant court.

Fifth set of Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

On Thursday 28 May 2020, the Minister issued regulations which took effect on 1 June 2020. This was when level 3 of the lockdown was implemented in South Africa. The regulations regarding the movement of children remained largely the same, except for the inter-provincial movement of children and student in relation to attending their places of learning. In short, the head of the school, or institution of higher learning must issue a certificate for the purposes of travelling between provinces. The regulations can be downloaded here.

Future regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

As can be seen from the aforesaid, the government has thus far issued 5 (five) sets of regulations regarding the movement of children between parents. Depending on how the fight of the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, it may call for changes to the regulations on the movement of children. We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws
Posted on by Telelaw

History of the law of exercising contact and care rights of parents during the lockdown in South Africa – The rollercoaster ride for parents and lawyers

The national lockdown not only affected our movement by keeping us in our homes. It also affected our relationships with people important and dearest in our lives. Here we refer to family, friends and colleagues to mention a few. Before the lockdown commenced in South Africa, parents were exercising contact with their children as they always have in the past. Friends and family gatherings were not seen as a privilege but as part of daily life, and an inherent right. However, when the lockdown commenced, things drastically changed. And without warning.

The following are a few of the actual consequences of the lockdown when it comes to family relations:

  • Spouses or partners who would only see each other for part of the day, now see each other virtually the entire day;
  • Schools are closed, and parents can only care for children at their homes;
  • Children were not allowed to move between parents as they were used to at the start of the lockdown;
  • Visits to close friends and your relatives are prohibited. Therefore, adult children may not have seen their parents since the lockdown commenced.
  • Siblings, cousins and spouses living in different provinces would not have seen each other for weeks.

The commencement of the National Lockdown in South Africa

The date 27 March 2020, is of great significance to all South Africans. It is the day were all South African’s were placed under lockdown. This was something no South African was prepared for. The call was imminent. The life we lived before that day, would not be lived for quite some time to come. Now let us look at the regulations dealing with the movement of children during the lockdown.

First Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

Regulations were then issued concerning the movement of children. In terms of the Regulations at the time, minor children were to remain in the care of the parent who had the child at the time. Have a look at an article written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf on this issue:

“The child must remain in the custody of the parent with whom the child was with when the lockdown period started” – Directive 6(m)(ii) in terms of the Regulations [30 March 2020]

This caused huge challenges for many parents. It meant that a parent who never cared for a child for longer than a day would now have to care for the child for the entire lockdown period. This also caused a huge stir. Not only for parents but also for the legal profession, especially for a lawyer who specialises in family law.

Second set of Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

The Regulations then changed, allowing movement as long as you have a registered parenting plan, or a parental rights and responsibilities agreement, both registered with the Office of the Family Advocate, or an Order of Court. This was also problematic as parents who did not have the latter documents could not have contact with their minor children. Have a look at an article written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf on this issue entitled:

New lockdown regulations regarding the movement of children – Certain Parents may move children during the National Lockdown period

No equality and dignity for parents without Court Order and Registered Plans and Agreements

 

Third set of Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

Then the regulations were again changed. It further allowed for the movement of children of parents who do not have a registered parenting plan, or a registered parental rights and responsibilities agreement or an Order of the Court. They may move from one home to another to collect and return their minor child with one requirement. They must have in their possession the birth certificate of the child, or a certified copy thereof. Have a look at an article written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf on this issue entitled: Latest Regulations: No Court order, registered agreement or parenting plan is required for the movement of children during the lockdown – 16 April 2020.

Fourth set of Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

Then came the recent regulations which have been issued after the extended lockdown in May 2020. In essence, parents may move with their child if they have a registered parenting plan, or a parental rights and responsibilities agreement or an Order of the Court. Another requirement was that the home the child is to move to is free from COVID-19. You will note that the birth certificate requirement for the parents who do not have the latter documents no longer applies.

If parents do not have a registered parenting plan, or a registered parental rights and responsibilities agreement or an Order of the Court, they may collect and drop-off the child only after they obtained a Magistrate’s Permit. A parent who has rights of contact needs to approach the magistrate in the area where he or she lives to obtain a permit to move the child. Have a look at these two posts on the topic.

The Magistrate’s Permit – 3 steps to obtain your permit to collect your child during lockdown

The Magistrate’s Permit – New regulations on Movement of children during the Lockdown

It should be noted that the permit does not give you rights of care and contact. It only allows you to move the child. So, if the police stop you, you can show them the permit. If you and the other parent have disputes regarding contact, you cannot use the permit as a way of enforcing contact. That must be resolved at a court of law. Therefore, if you visit the child to collect him with a permit, and the other parent refuses you contact, you still need to approach the relevant court.

Fifth set of Regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

On Thursday 28 May 2020, the Minister issued regulations which took effect on 1 June 2020. This was when level 3 of the lockdown was implemented in South Africa. The regulations regarding the movement of children remained largely the same, except for the inter-provincial movement of children and student in relation to attending their places of learning. In short, the head of the school, or institution of higher learning must issue a certificate for the purposes of travelling between provinces. The regulations can be downloaded here.

Future regulations regarding the movement of children during the lockdown

As can be seen from the aforesaid, the government has thus far issued 5 (five) sets of regulations regarding the movement of children between parents. Depending on how the fight of the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, it may call for changes to the regulations on the movement of children.

We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well.

Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links:

Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws

Related Post

Relocation of minor children with a parent. What does the Courts and Family Advocate look at?

Relocating with your minor child where the consent of the other parent is provided is ideal. If consent is not provided, then the Court would need to get involved. This applies to both local (example, provincial relocation) and international (moving abroad). Our High Court often hear applications for relocation of minor children. Sometimes the issues are simple, and other times, less so. However, the ultimate question is whether or not it is in the minor child’s best interest.

High Court getting involved in minor children relocation matters

In the unreported judgment of CG v NG 2015 JDR 0391 (GJ), the Applicant, being the mother, approached the Gauteng High Court for permission to relocate with her minor children from Gauteng to Cape Town. We shall not deal with the history and all the facts of the matter, save for the important principles applied to the relevant facts. In this matter, the Office of the Family Advocate was called upon to provide a report as to the intended relocation. This they did and which the Court considered. That is illustrated in the judgment below.

Extracts of a Judgemnet of the High Court in a Relocation of minor children matter

The following aspects of the judgement would be of benefit:
[22] The ruling on the postponement leaves this court to deal with the only remaining issue between the parties and that is whether or not the Applicant should relocate to Cape Town with the minor children. The law on matters of relocation is clear. The relocation must be in the best interest of the minor children as is prescribed in the Children’s Act No. 38of 2005. In addition, an applicant in the position of the Applicant is at liberty to relocate with minor children provided his or her intention is bona fide and reasonable. The test applies to both relocation within the borders of South Africa and abroad. See Jackson v Jackson 2002 SA 303 (SCA) and B v M 2006 (9) BCLR 1034 (W) to which Counsel for the Applicant referred this court. [23] Accordingly, the following two questions arise: 23.1 Is the proposed relocation in the best interest of the minor children? 23.2 Is the Applicant’s intended move bona fide and reasonable? [24] Whether or not an applicant’s proposed move is bona fide and reasonable should be a factual enquiry. Needless to state therefore that each case must be assessed on its own merits. The Applicant has been living in Johannesburg, xxx, while married to the Respondent and to date she continues to do so. [25] Her relationship with the Respondent has become estranged a result of which she now holds the view that it will benefit her to be next to her family, mother, father brother and sister-in-law all of whom are in the area of Cape Town, xxx. [26] Her family will give her the emotional support that she cannot get in Johannesburg. Furthermore, once the minor children are settled, her mother will give her support by fetching them from school such that she could start looking for employment. [27] As the primary custodian parent of the minor children, her move to Cape Town will of necessity be in their best interest. She does not see herself being separated from them as that will prejudice her relationship with them. Her proposed move to Cape Town is supported by her psychologists, Ms Becker and, Ms Chelvers. [28] The Applicant asserts further that the Respondent whom she describes as ‘exceedingly wealthy’ can still exercise his rights as per the orders of Van Oosten and Victor JJ. She does not foresee any problems whether financially or otherwise for The Respondent to fly to Cape Town to see the children as he does presently in Johannesburg. [29] In response to the Applicant’s averments, the respondent alleges that it will not be possible for him to travel to Cape Town on a weekly or monthly basis as this will necessarily involve increased costs for him. Moreover, it will take him away from his only source of income, his work. [30] The relocation of the minor children means that he will have to seek accommodation in Cape Town, transport and time off work in order to exercise his rights. His ability to generate income will be immensely impaired and that could have devastating repercussions for both the minor children and the Applicant especially as she is unemployed and fully dependent on the monthly maintenance that he pays. [31] The Family Advocate unequivocally recommends that the status quo be maintained because to move the minor children to Cape Town will reverse the stability that has prevailed since the introduction of the increased access by their father. The Applicant herself has agreed that all three minor children like their father and that they cannot wait to visit him. The Family Advocate also alludes to the fact that Gabriel, the eldest of the minor children appears settled with her friends at school. [32] Moving them to Cape Town under these circumstances could upset their routine and bring unnecessary shock to their lives at the time when they are beginning to settle. The Family Advocate is an expert in these kind of matters and he undoubtedly compiled the report with the best interest of the minor children in mind. This court has no reason to doubt the outcome and accordingly adopts it. [33] In the result, the following order is made:
  1. The application is dismissed;
  2. The Applicant is ordered to pay the costs as between attorney and client.
From the above it is clear that the Court looked at various factors, as well as the report of the Office of the Family Advocate.      

Posted on by Telelaw

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!