Hague Convention On The Civil Aspects Of International Child

On 20 November 1996 the President assented to the Hague Convention On The Civil Aspects Of International Child. The entire Act can be found at the end of this article. South Africa ratified the Convention in 1996 and the Act came into operation on 1 October 1997. The Convention’s main object is to enforce rights of custody over a child(ren) who has been wrongfully removed to or kept in a foreign country in breach of those rights and to secure the prompt return of the child(ren) to South Africa. https://www.justice.gov.za/hague/main.htm Below is the complete Convention found at https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/a72-96.pdf . NO. 72 OF 1996: HAGUE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD PRESIDENT’S OFFICE No. 1872. 20 November 1996 NO. 72 OF 1996: HAGUE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION ACT, 1996. It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act which is hereby published for general information:- ACT To provide for the application in the Republic of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; and to provide for matters connected therewith. (English text signed by the President.) (Assented to 6 November 1996.) BE IT ENACTED by the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa. as follows:- Definitions 1. In this Act, unless the context otherwise indicates- (i) “Central Authority” means the Central Authority designated in terms of section 3; (v) (ii) “Convention” means the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, adopted on 25 October 1980 at The Hague, and set out in the Schedule; (ii) (iii) “Minister” means the Minister of Justice; (iii) (iv) “regulation” means a regulation made under this Act; (iv) (v) “this Act” includes the regulations. (i) Application of Convention 2. The Convention shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, apply in the Republic. Designation of Central Authority 3. For the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention the Chief Family Advocate appointed by the Minister in terms of the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act, 1987 (Act No. 24 of 1987), is hereby designated as the Central Authority for the Republic. Delegation 4. (1) The Central Authority may, subject to such conditions as he or she may impose, delegate or assign any power or duty conferred or imposed upon him or her by or under the Convention to any Family Advocate appointed in terms of the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act, 1987 (Act No. 24 of 1987). (2) The delegation, assignment and conditions imposed shall be in writing. Regulations 5. (1) The Minister may make regulations- (a) to give effect to any provision of the Convention; and (b) prescribing fees, and providing for the recovery of any expenditure incurred, in connection with the application of the Convention. (2) A regulation made under subsection (1) may prescribe a penalty of a fine or of imprisonment for a period not exceeding 12 months for any contravention thereof or failure to comply therewith. (3) Any regulation made under subsection (1) shall be laid upon the Table in Parliament within 14 days after the publication thereof in the Gazette if Parliament is then in ordinary session, or, if Parliament is not in ordinary session, within 14 days after the commencement of the next ensuing ordinary session. (4) Any regulation referred to in subsection (3) or any provision thereof may, by resolution passed by both Houses of Parliament during the session in which such regulation has been laid upon the Table, be rejected, and if the said regulation or provision is so rejected the provisions of section 12(2) of the Interpretation Act, 1957 (Act No. 33 of 1957), shall apply as if such resolution were a law repealing the regulation or provision in question. Short title and commencement 6.This Act shall be called the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Act, 1996, and shall come into operation on a date fixed by the President by proclamation in the Gazette. SCHEDULE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION The States signatory to the present Convention- Firmly convinced that the interests of children are of paramount importance in matters relating to their custody. Desiring to protect children internationally from the harmful effects of their wrongful removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State of their habitual residence, as well as to secure protection for rights of access. Have resolved to conclude a Convention to this effect, and have agreed upon the following provisions- CHAPTER I SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION Article 1 The objects of the present Convention area to secure the prompt return of children wrongfully removed to or retained in any Contracting State; and b to ensure that rights of custody and of access under the law of one Contracting State are effectively respected in the other Contracting States. Article 2 Contracting States shall take all appropriate measures to secure within their territories the implementation of the objects of the Convention. For this purpose they shall use the most expeditious procedures available. Article 3 The removal or the retention of a child is to be considered wrongful wherea it is in breach of rights of custody attributed to a person, an institution or any other body, either jointly or alone, under the law of the State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention; and b at the time of removal or retention those rights were actually exercised, either jointly or alone, or would have been so exercised but for the removal or retention. The rights of custody mentioned in subparagraph a above, may arise in particular by operation of law or by reason of a judicial or administrative decision, or by reason of an agreement having legal effect under the law of that State. Article 4 The Convention shall apply to any child who was habitually resident in a Contracting State immediately before any breach of custody or access rights. The Convention shall cease to apply when the child attains the age of 16 years. Article 5 For the purposes of this Conventiona rights of custody” shall include rights relating to the care of the person of the child and, in particular, the right to determine the child’s place of residence b “rights of access” shall include the right to take a child for a limited period of time to a place other than the child’s habitual residence. CHAPTER II CENTRAL AUTHORITIES Article 6 A Contracting State shall designate a Central Authority to discharge the duties which are imposed by the Convention upon such authorities. Federal States, States with more than one system of law or States having autonomous territorial organizations shall be free to appoint more than one Central Authority and to specify the territorial extent of their powers. Where a State has appointed more than one Central Authority, it shall designate the Central Authority to which applications may be addressed for transmission to the appropriate Central Authority within that State. Article 7 Central Authorities shall co-operate with each other and promote co-operation amongst the competent authorities in their respective States to secure the prompt return of children and to achieve the other objects of this Convention. In particular, either directly or through any intermediary, they shall take all appropriate measures a to discover the whereabouts of a child who has been wrongfully removed or retained; b to prevent further harm to the child or prejudice to interested parties by taking or causing to be taken provisional measures; c to secure the voluntary return of the child or to bring about an amicable resolution of the issues; d to exchange, where desirable, information relating to the social background of the child; e to provide information of a general character as to the law of their State in connection with the application of the Convention; f to initiate or facilitate the institution of judicial or administrative proceedings with a view to obtaining the return of the child and, in a proper case, to make arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise of rights of access; g where the circumstances so require, to provide or facilitate the provision of legal aid and advice, including the participation of legal counsel and advisers; h to provide such administrative arrangements as may be necessary and appropriate to secure the safe return of the child; i to keep each other informed with respect to the operation of this Convention and, as far as possible, to eliminate any obstacles to its application. CHAPTER III RETURN OF CHILDREN Article 8 Any person, institution or other body claiming that a child has been removed or retained in breach of custody rights may apply either to the Central Authority of the child’s habitual residence or to the Central Authority of any other Contracting State for assistance in securing the return of the child. The application shall contain a information concerning the identity of the applicant, of the child and of the person alleged to have removed or retained the child; b where available, the date of birth of the child; c the grounds on which the applicant’s claim for return of the child is based: d all available information relating to the whereabouts of the child and the identity of the person with whom the child is presumed to be. The application may be accompanied or supplemented by e an authenticated copy of any relevant decision or agreement; f a certificate or an affidavit emanating from a Central Authority, or other competent authority of the State of the child’s habitual residence, or from a qualified person, concerning the relevant law of that State; g any other relevant documents. Article 9 If the Central Authority which receives an application referred to in Article 8 has reason to believe that the child is in another Contracting State, it shall directly and without delay transmit the application to the Central Authority of that Contracting State and inform the requesting Central Authority or the applicant, as the case may be. Article 10 The Central Authority of the State where the child is shall take or cause tobe taken all appropriate measures in order to obtain the voluntary return of the child. Article 11 The judicial or administrative authorities of Contracting States shall act expeditiously in proceedings for the return of children. If the judicial or administrative authority concerned has not reached a decision within six weeks from the date of commencement of the proceedings, the applicant or the Central Authority of the requested State, on its own initiative or if asked by the Central Authority of the requesting State, shall have the right to request a statement of the reasons for the delay. If a reply is received by the Central Authority of the requested State, that Authority shall transmit the reply to the Central Authority of the requesting State, or to the applicant, as the case may be. Article 12 Where a child has been wrongfully removed or retained in terms of Article 3 and, at the date of the commencement of the proceedings before the judicial or administrative authority of the Contracting State where the child is, a period of less than one year has elapsed from the date of the wrongful removal or retention, the authority concerned shall order the return of the child forthwith. The judicial or administrative authority, even where the proceedings have been commenced after the expiration of the period of one year referred to in the preceding paragraph, shall also order the return of the child, unless it is demonstrated that the child is now settled in its new environment. Where the judicial or administrative authority in the requested State has reason to believe that the child has been taken to another State, it may stay the proceedings or dismiss the application for the return of the child. Article 13 Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding Article, the judicial or administrative authority of the requested State is not bound to order the return of the child if the person, institution or other body which opposes its return establishes that a the person, institution or other body having the care of the person of the child was not actually exercising the custody rights at the time of removal or retention, or had consented to or subsequently acquiesced in the removal or retention; or b there is a grave risk that his or her return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation. The judicial or administrative authority may also refuse to order the return of the child if it finds that the child objects to being returned and has attained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take account of its views. In considering the circumstances referred to in this Article, the judicial and administrative authorities shall take into account the information relating to the social background of the child provided by the Central Authority or other competent authority of the child’s habitual residence. Article 14 In ascertaining whether there has been a wrongful removal or retention within the meaning of Article 3, the judicial or administrative authorities of the requested State may take notice directly of the law of, and of judicial or administrative decisions, formally recognized or not in the State of the habitual residence of the child, without recourse to the specific procedures for the proof of that law or for the recognition of foreign decisions which would otherwise be applicable. Article 15 The judicial or administrative authorities of a Contracting State may, prior to the making of an order for the return of the child, request that the applicant obtain from the authorities of the State of the habitual residence of the child a decision or other determination that the removal or retention was wrongful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention, where such a decision or determination may be obtained in that State. The Central Authorities of the Contracting States shall so far as practicable assist applicants to obtain such a decision or determination. Article 16 After receiving notice of a wrongful removal or retention of a child in the sense of Article 3, the judicial or administrative authorities of the Contracting State to which the child has been removed or in which it has been retained shall not decide on the merits of rights of custody until it has been determined that the child is not to be returned under this Convention or unless an application under this Convention is not lodged within a reasonable time following receipt of the notice. Article 17 The sole fact that a decision relating to custody has been given in or is entitled to recognition in the requested State shall not be a ground for refusing to return a child under this Convention, but the judicial or administrative authorities of the requested State may take account of the reasons for that decision in applying this Convention. Article 18 The provisions of this Chapter do not limit the power of a judicial or administrative authority to order the return of the child at any time. Article 19 A decision under this Convention concerning the return of the child shall not be taken to be a determination on the merits of any custody issue. Article 20 The return of the child under the provisions of Article 12 may be refused if this would not be permitted by the fundamental principles of the requested State relating to the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. CHAPTER IV RIGHTS OF ACCESS Article 21 An application to make arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise of rights of access may be presented to the Central Authorities of the Contracting States in the same way as an application for the return of a child. The Central Authorities are bound by the obligations of co-operation which are set forth in Article 7 to promote the peaceful enjoyment of access rights and the fulfilment of any conditions to which the exercise of those rights may be subject. The Central Authorities shall take steps to remove, as far as possible, all obstacles to the exercise of such rights. The Central Authorities, either directly or through intermediaries, may initiate or assist in the institution of proceedings with a view to organizing or protecting these rights and securing respect for the conditions to which the exercise of these rights may be subject. CHAPTER V GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 22 No security, bond or deposit, however described, shall be required to guarantee the payment of costs and expenses in the judicial or administrative proceedings falling within the scope of this Convention. Article 23 No legalization or similar formality may be required in the context of this Convention. Article 24 Any application, communication or other document sent to the Central Authority of the requested State shall be in the original language, and shall be accompanied by a translation into the official language or one of the official languages of the requested State or, where that is not feasible, a translation into French or English. However, a Contracting State may, by making a reservation in accordance with Article 42, object to the use of either French or English, but not both, in any application, communication or other document sent to its Central Authority. Article 25 Nationals of the Contracting States and persons who are habitually resident within those States shall be entitled in matters concerned with the application of this Convention to legal aid and advice in any other Contracting State on the same conditions as if they themselves were nationals of and habitually resident in that State. Article 26 Each Central Authority shall bear its own costs in applying this Convention. Central Authorities and other public services of Contracting States shall not impose any charges in relation to applications submitted under this Convention. In particular, they may not require any payment from the applicant towards the costs and expenses of the proceedings or, where applicable, those arising from the participation of legal counsel or advisers. However, they may require the payment of the expenses incurred or to be incurred in implementing the return of the child. However, a Contracting State may, by making a reservation in accordance with Article 42, declare that it shall not be bound to assume any costs referred to in the preceding paragraph resulting from the participation of legal counsel or advisers or from court proceedings, except insofar as those costs may be covered by its system of legal aid and advice. Upon ordering the return of a child or issuing an order concerning rights of access under this Convention, the judicial or administrative authorities may, where appropriate, direct the person who removed or retained the child, or who prevented the exercise of rights of access, to pay necessary expenses incurred by or on behalf of the applicant, including travel expenses, any costs incurred or payments made for locating the child, the costs of legal representation of the applicant, and those of returning the child. Article 27 When it is manifest that the requirements of this Convention are not fulfilled or that the application is otherwise not well founded, a Central Authority is not bound to accept the application. In that case the Central Authority shall forthwith inform the applicant or the Central Authority through which the application was submitted, as the case may be, of its reasons. Article 28 A Central Authority may require that the application be accompanied by a written authorization empowering it to act on behalf of the applicant, or to designate a representative so to act. Article 29 This Convention shall not preclude any person, institution or body who claims that there has been a breach of custody or access rights within the meaning of Article 3 or 21 from applying directly to the judicial or administrative authorities of a Contracting State, whether or not under the provisions of this Convention. Article 30 Any application submitted to the Central Authorities or directly to the judicial or administrative authorities of a Contracting State in accordance with the terms of this Convention, together with documents and any other information appended thereto or provided by a Central Authority, shall be admissible in the courts or administrative authorities of the Contracting States. Article 31 In relation to a State which in matters of custody of children has two or more systems of law applicable in different territorial unitsa any reference to habitual residence in that State shall be construed as referring to habitual residence in a territorial unit of that State; b any reference to the law of the State of habitual residence shall be construed as referring to the law of the territorial unit in that State where the child habitually resides. Article 32 In relation to a State which in matters of custody of children has two or more systems of law applicable to different categories of persons, any reference to the law of that State shall be construed as referring to the legal system specified by the law of that State. Article 33 A State within which different territorial units have their own rules of law in respect of custody of children shall not be bound to apply this Convention where a State with a unified system of law would not be bound to do so. Article 34 This Convention shall take priority in matters within its scope over the Convention of 5 October 1961 concerning the powers of authorities and the law applicable in respect of the protection of minors, as between Parties to both Conventions. Otherwise the present Convention shall not restrict the application of an international instrument in force between the State of origin and the State addressed or other law of the State addressed for the purposes of obtaining the return of a child who has been wrongfully removed or retained or of organizing access rights. Article 35 This Convention shall apply as between Contracting States only to wrongful removals or retentions occurring after its entry into force in those States. Where a declaration has been made under Article 39 or 40, the reference in the preceding paragraph to a Contracting State shall be taken to refer to the territorial unit or units in relation to which this Convention applies. Article 36 Nothing in this Convention shall prevent two or more Contracting States, in order to limit the restrictions to which the return of the child may be subject, from agreeing among themselves to derogate from any provisions of this Convention which may imply such a restriction. CHAPTER VI FINAL CLAUSES Article 37 The Convention shall be open for signature by the States which were Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law at the time of its Fourteenth Session. It shall be ratified, accepted or approved and the instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Article 38 Any other State may accede to the Convention. The instrument of accession shall be deposited with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The Convention shall enter into force for a State acceding to it on the first day of the third calendar month after the deposit of its instrument of accession. The accession will have effect only as regard the relations between the acceding State and such Contracting States as will have declared their acceptance of the accession. Such a declaration will also have to be made by any Member State ratifying, accepting or approving the Convention after an accession. Such declaration shall be deposited at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands: the Ministry shall forward through diplomatic channels, a certified copy to each of the Contracting States. The Convention will enter into force as between the acceding State and the State that has declared its acceptance of the accession on the first day of the third calendar month after the deposit of the declaration of acceptance. Article 39 Any State may, at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, declare that the Convention shall extend to all the territories for the international relations of which it is responsible, or to one or more of them. Such a declaration shall take effect at the time the Convention enters into force for that State. Such declaration, as well as any subsequent extension, shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Article 40 If a Contracting State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law are applicable in relation to matters dealt with in this Convention, it may at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession declare that this Convention shall extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them and may modify this declaration by submitting another declaration at any time. Any such declaration shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and shall state expressly the territorial units to which the Convention applies. Article 41 Where a Contracting State has a system of government under which executive, judicial and legislative powers are distributed between central and other authorities within that State, its signature or ratification, acceptance or approval of or accession to this Convention, or its making of any declaration in terms of Article 40 shall carry no implication as to the internal distribution of powers within that State. Article 42 Any State may, not later than the time of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, or at the time of making a declaration in terms of Article 39 or 40 make one or both of the reservations provided for in Article 24 and Article 26, third paragraph. No other reservation shall be permitted. Any State may at any time withdraw a reservation it has made. The withdrawal shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The reservation shall cease to have effect on the first day of the third calendar month after the notification referred to in the preceding paragraph. Article 43 The Convention shall enter into force on the first day of the third calendar month after the deposit of the third instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession referred to in Articles 37 and 38. Thereafter the Convention shall enter into force- 1 for each State ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to it subsequently, on the first day of the third calendar month after the deposit of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession; 2 for any territory or territorial unit to which the Convention has been extended in conformity with Article 39 or 40, on the first day of the third calendar month after the notification referred to in that Article. Article 44 The Convention shall remain in force for five years from the date of its entry into force in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 43 even for States which subsequently have ratified, accepted, approved it or acceded to it. Any denunciation shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands at least six months before the expiry of the five year period. It may be limited to certain of the territories or territorial units to which the Convention applies. The denunciation shall have effect only as regards the State which has notified it. The Convention shall remain in force for the other Contracting States. Article 45 The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands shall notify the States Members of the Conference, and the States which have acceded in accordance with Article 38, of the following- 1 the signatures and ratifications, acceptances and approvals referred to in Article 37; 2 the accessions referred to in Article 38; 3 the date on which the Convention enters into force in accordance with Article 43; 4 the extensions referred to in Article 39; 5 the declarations referred to in Articles 38 and 40; 6 the reservations referred to in Article 24 and Article 26, third paragraph and the withdrawals referred to in Article 42; and 7 the denunciations referred to in Article 44. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Convention. Done at The Hague, on the 25th day of October 1980 in the English and French languages, both texts being equally authentic in a single copy which shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands,$ and of which a certified copy shall be sent through diplomatic channels to each of the States Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law at the date of its Fourteenth Session.

Posted on 11 February 2025 by Telelaw

Hague Convention On The Civil Aspects Of International Child

On 20 November 1996 the President assented to the Hague Convention On The Civil Aspects Of International Child. The entire Act can be found at the end of this article.

South Africa ratified the Convention in 1996 and the Act came into operation on 1 October 1997. The Convention’s main object is to enforce rights of custody over a child(ren) who has been wrongfully removed to or kept in a foreign country in breach of those rights and to secure the prompt return of the child(ren) to South Africa. https://www.justice.gov.za/hague/main.htm

Below is the complete Convention found at https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/a72-96.pdf .

NO. 72 OF 1996: HAGUE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD
PRESIDENT’S OFFICE
No. 1872.
20 November 1996
NO. 72 OF 1996: HAGUE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD
ABDUCTION ACT, 1996.
It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act which is hereby published for general information:-
ACT
To provide for the application in the Republic of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; and to provide for matters connected therewith.
(English text signed by the President.)
(Assented to 6 November 1996.)
BE IT ENACTED by the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa. as
follows:-
Definitions
1. In this Act, unless the context otherwise indicates-
(i) “Central Authority” means the Central Authority designated in terms
of section 3; (v)
(ii) “Convention” means the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of
International Child Abduction, adopted on 25 October 1980 at The Hague, and set out in the Schedule; (ii)
(iii) “Minister” means the Minister of Justice; (iii)
(iv) “regulation” means a regulation made under this Act; (iv)
(v) “this Act” includes the regulations. (i)
Application of Convention
2. The Convention shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, apply in the Republic.
Designation of Central Authority
3. For the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention the Chief Family
Advocate appointed by the Minister in terms of the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters
Act, 1987 (Act No. 24 of 1987), is hereby designated as the Central Authority
for the Republic.
Delegation
4. (1) The Central Authority may, subject to such conditions as he or she
may impose, delegate or assign any power or duty conferred or imposed upon him or her by or under the Convention to any Family Advocate appointed in terms of the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act, 1987 (Act No. 24 of 1987).
(2) The delegation, assignment and conditions imposed shall be in writing.
Regulations
5. (1) The Minister may make regulations-
(a) to give effect to any provision of the Convention; and
(b) prescribing fees, and providing for the recovery of any expenditure
incurred, in connection with the application of the Convention.
(2) A regulation made under subsection (1) may prescribe a penalty of a fine or of imprisonment for a period not exceeding 12 months for any contravention thereof or failure to comply therewith.
(3) Any regulation made under subsection (1) shall be laid upon the Table in Parliament within 14 days after the publication thereof in the Gazette if Parliament is then in ordinary session, or, if Parliament is not in ordinary session, within 14 days after the commencement of the next ensuing ordinary
session.
(4) Any regulation referred to in subsection (3) or any provision thereof may, by resolution passed by both Houses of Parliament during the session in which such regulation has been laid upon the Table, be rejected, and if the
said regulation or provision is so rejected the provisions of section 12(2) of
the Interpretation Act, 1957 (Act No. 33 of 1957), shall apply as if such
resolution were a law repealing the regulation or provision in question.
Short title and commencement
6.This Act shall be called the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of
International Child Abduction Act, 1996, and shall come into operation on a
date fixed by the President by proclamation in the Gazette.
SCHEDULE
CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION
The States signatory to the present Convention-
Firmly convinced that the interests of children are of paramount importance
in matters relating to their custody. Desiring to protect children internationally from the harmful effects of their wrongful removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State of their habitual residence, as well as to secure protection for rights of access. Have resolved to conclude a Convention to this effect, and have agreed upon the following provisions-
CHAPTER I
SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION
Article 1
The objects of the present Convention area to secure the prompt return of children wrongfully removed to or retained in any Contracting State; and
b to ensure that rights of custody and of access under the law of one
Contracting State are effectively respected in the other Contracting States.
Article 2
Contracting States shall take all appropriate measures to secure within
their territories the implementation of the objects of the Convention. For this purpose they shall use the most expeditious procedures available.
Article 3
The removal or the retention of a child is to be considered wrongful wherea
it is in breach of rights of custody attributed to a person, an institution
or any other body, either jointly or alone, under the law of the State in
which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or
retention; and
b at the time of removal or retention those rights were actually exercised,
either jointly or alone, or would have been so exercised but for the removal
or retention.
The rights of custody mentioned in subparagraph a above, may arise in
particular by operation of law or by reason of a judicial or administrative
decision, or by reason of an agreement having legal effect under the law of
that State.
Article 4
The Convention shall apply to any child who was habitually resident in a
Contracting State immediately before any breach of custody or access rights.
The Convention shall cease to apply when the child attains the age of 16 years.
Article 5
For the purposes of this Conventiona
rights of custody” shall include rights relating to the care of the person of
the child and, in particular, the right to determine the child’s place of residence
b “rights of access” shall include the right to take a child for a limited
period of time to a place other than the child’s habitual residence.
CHAPTER II
CENTRAL AUTHORITIES
Article 6
A Contracting State shall designate a Central Authority to discharge the
duties which are imposed by the Convention upon such authorities.
Federal States, States with more than one system of law or States having
autonomous territorial organizations shall be free to appoint more than one
Central Authority and to specify the territorial extent of their powers.
Where a State has appointed more than one Central Authority, it shall designate the
Central Authority to which applications may be addressed for transmission to the appropriate Central Authority within that State.
Article 7
Central Authorities shall co-operate with each other and promote co-operation amongst the competent authorities in their respective States to secure the prompt return of children and to achieve the other objects of this Convention.
In particular, either directly or through any intermediary, they shall take
all appropriate measures

a to discover the whereabouts of a child who has been wrongfully removed or
retained;
b to prevent further harm to the child or prejudice to interested parties by
taking or causing to be taken provisional measures;
c to secure the voluntary return of the child or to bring about an amicable
resolution of the issues;
d to exchange, where desirable, information relating to the social background
of the child;
e to provide information of a general character as to the law of their State
in connection with the application of the Convention;
f to initiate or facilitate the institution of judicial or administrative
proceedings with a view to obtaining the return of the child and, in a
proper case, to make arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise
of rights of access;
g where the circumstances so require, to provide or facilitate the provision
of legal aid and advice, including the participation of legal counsel and
advisers;
h to provide such administrative arrangements as may be necessary and
appropriate to secure the safe return of the child;
i to keep each other informed with respect to the operation of this Convention
and, as far as possible, to eliminate any obstacles to its application.
CHAPTER III
RETURN OF CHILDREN
Article 8
Any person, institution or other body claiming that a child has been removed or retained in breach of custody rights may apply either to the Central Authority of the child’s habitual residence or to the Central Authority of any other Contracting State for assistance in securing the return of the child.
The application shall contain

a information concerning the identity of the applicant, of the child and of
the person alleged to have removed or retained the child;
b where available, the date of birth of the child;
c the grounds on which the applicant’s claim for return of the child is based:
d all available information relating to the whereabouts of the child and the identity of the person with whom the child is presumed to be. The application may be accompanied or supplemented by

e an authenticated copy of any relevant decision or agreement;
f a certificate or an affidavit emanating from a Central Authority, or other
competent authority of the State of the child’s habitual residence, or from
a qualified person, concerning the relevant law of that State;
g any other relevant documents.
Article 9
If the Central Authority which receives an application referred to in
Article 8 has reason to believe that the child is in another Contracting
State, it shall directly and without delay transmit the application to the Central
Authority of that Contracting State and inform the requesting Central
Authority or the applicant, as the case may be.
Article 10
The Central Authority of the State where the child is shall take or cause
tobe taken all appropriate measures in order to obtain the voluntary return of
the child.
Article 11
The judicial or administrative authorities of Contracting States shall act
expeditiously in proceedings for the return of children.
If the judicial or administrative authority concerned has not reached a
decision within six weeks from the date of commencement of the proceedings,
the applicant or the Central Authority of the requested State, on its own
initiative or if asked by the Central Authority of the requesting State, shall
have the right to request a statement of the reasons for the delay. If a
reply is received by the Central Authority of the requested State, that Authority
shall transmit the reply to the Central Authority of the requesting State, or
to the applicant, as the case may be.
Article 12
Where a child has been wrongfully removed or retained in terms of Article 3
and, at the date of the commencement of the proceedings before the judicial or
administrative authority of the Contracting State where the child is, a period
of less than one year has elapsed from the date of the wrongful removal or
retention, the authority concerned shall order the return of the child
forthwith.
The judicial or administrative authority, even where the proceedings have
been commenced after the expiration of the period of one year referred to in
the preceding paragraph, shall also order the return of the child, unless it
is demonstrated that the child is now settled in its new environment.
Where the judicial or administrative authority in the requested State has
reason to believe that the child has been taken to another State, it may stay
the proceedings or dismiss the application for the return of the child.
Article 13
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding Article, the judicial or
administrative authority of the requested State is not bound to order the
return of the child if the person, institution or other body which opposes its
return establishes that

a the person, institution or other body having the care of the person of the
child was not actually exercising the custody rights at the time of removal
or retention, or had consented to or subsequently acquiesced in the removal
or retention; or
b there is a grave risk that his or her return would expose the child to
physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an
intolerable
situation.
The judicial or administrative authority may also refuse to order the
return of the child if it finds that the child objects to being returned and has
attained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take
account of its views.
In considering the circumstances referred to in this Article, the judicial
and administrative authorities shall take into account the information
relating to the social background of the child provided by the Central Authority or
other competent authority of the child’s habitual residence.
Article 14
In ascertaining whether there has been a wrongful removal or retention
within the meaning of Article 3, the judicial or administrative authorities of
the requested State may take notice directly of the law of, and of judicial or
administrative decisions, formally recognized or not in the State of the
habitual residence of the child, without recourse to the specific procedures
for the proof of that law or for the recognition of foreign decisions which
would otherwise be applicable.
Article 15
The judicial or administrative authorities of a Contracting State may,
prior
to the making of an order for the return of the child, request that the
applicant obtain from the authorities of the State of the habitual residence
of
the child a decision or other determination that the removal or retention was
wrongful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention, where such a
decision or determination may be obtained in that State. The Central
Authorities of the Contracting States shall so far as practicable assist
applicants to obtain such a decision or determination.
Article 16
After receiving notice of a wrongful removal or retention of a child in the
sense of Article 3, the judicial or administrative authorities of the
Contracting State to which the child has been removed or in which it has been
retained shall not decide on the merits of rights of custody until it has been
determined that the child is not to be returned under this Convention or
unless
an application under this Convention is not lodged within a reasonable time
following receipt of the notice.
Article 17
The sole fact that a decision relating to custody has been given in or is
entitled to recognition in the requested State shall not be a ground for
refusing to return a child under this Convention, but the judicial or
administrative authorities of the requested State may take account of the
reasons for that decision in applying this Convention.
Article 18
The provisions of this Chapter do not limit the power of a judicial or
administrative authority to order the return of the child at any time.
Article 19
A decision under this Convention concerning the return of the child shall
not be taken to be a determination on the merits of any custody issue.
Article 20
The return of the child under the provisions of Article 12 may be refused
if
this would not be permitted by the fundamental principles of the requested
State relating to the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
CHAPTER IV
RIGHTS OF ACCESS
Article 21
An application to make arrangements for organizing or securing the
effective
exercise of rights of access may be presented to the Central Authorities of
the
Contracting States in the same way as an application for the return of a
child.
The Central Authorities are bound by the obligations of co-operation which
are set forth in Article 7 to promote the peaceful enjoyment of access rights
and the fulfilment of any conditions to which the exercise of those rights may
be subject. The Central Authorities shall take steps to remove, as far as
possible, all obstacles to the exercise of such rights. The Central
Authorities, either directly or through intermediaries, may initiate or assist
in the institution of proceedings with a view to organizing or protecting
these
rights and securing respect for the conditions to which the exercise of these
rights may be subject.
CHAPTER V
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 22
No security, bond or deposit, however described, shall be required to
guarantee the payment of costs and expenses in the judicial or administrative
proceedings falling within the scope of this Convention.
Article 23
No legalization or similar formality may be required in the context of this
Convention.
Article 24
Any application, communication or other document sent to the Central
Authority of the requested State shall be in the original language, and shall
be accompanied by a translation into the official language or one of the
official languages of the requested State or, where that is not feasible, a
translation into French or English.
However, a Contracting State may, by making a reservation in accordance
with
Article 42, object to the use of either French or English, but not both, in
any
application, communication or other document sent to its Central Authority.
Article 25
Nationals of the Contracting States and persons who are habitually resident
within those States shall be entitled in matters concerned with the
application
of this Convention to legal aid and advice in any other Contracting State on
the same conditions as if they themselves were nationals of and habitually
resident in that State.
Article 26
Each Central Authority shall bear its own costs in applying this
Convention.
Central Authorities and other public services of Contracting States shall
not impose any charges in relation to applications submitted under this
Convention. In particular, they may not require any payment from the
applicant
towards the costs and expenses of the proceedings or, where applicable, those
arising from the participation of legal counsel or advisers. However, they
may
require the payment of the expenses incurred or to be incurred in implementing
the return of the child.
However, a Contracting State may, by making a reservation in accordance
with
Article 42, declare that it shall not be bound to assume any costs referred to
in the preceding paragraph resulting from the participation of legal counsel
or
advisers or from court proceedings, except insofar as those costs may be
covered by its system of legal aid and advice.
Upon ordering the return of a child or issuing an order concerning rights
of
access under this Convention, the judicial or administrative authorities may,
where appropriate, direct the person who removed or retained the child, or who
prevented the exercise of rights of access, to pay necessary expenses incurred
by or on behalf of the applicant, including travel expenses, any costs
incurred
or payments made for locating the child, the costs of legal representation of
the applicant, and those of returning the child.
Article 27
When it is manifest that the requirements of this Convention are not
fulfilled or that the application is otherwise not well founded, a Central
Authority is not bound to accept the application. In that case the Central
Authority shall forthwith inform the applicant or the Central Authority
through
which the application was submitted, as the case may be, of its reasons.
Article 28
A Central Authority may require that the application be accompanied by a
written authorization empowering it to act on behalf of the applicant, or to
designate a representative so to act.
Article 29
This Convention shall not preclude any person, institution or body who
claims that there has been a breach of custody or access rights within the
meaning of Article 3 or 21 from applying directly to the judicial or
administrative authorities of a Contracting State, whether or not under the
provisions of this Convention.
Article 30
Any application submitted to the Central Authorities or directly to the
judicial or administrative authorities of a Contracting State in accordance
with the terms of this Convention, together with documents and any other
information appended thereto or provided by a Central Authority, shall be
admissible in the courts or administrative authorities of the Contracting
States.
Article 31
In relation to a State which in matters of custody of children has two or
more systems of law applicable in different territorial unitsa
any reference to habitual residence in that State shall be construed as
referring to habitual residence in a territorial unit of that State;
b any reference to the law of the State of habitual residence shall be
construed as referring to the law of the territorial unit in that State
where
the child habitually resides.
Article 32
In relation to a State which in matters of custody of children has two or
more systems of law applicable to different categories of persons, any
reference to the law of that State shall be construed as referring to the
legal
system specified by the law of that State.
Article 33
A State within which different territorial units have their own rules of
law
in respect of custody of children shall not be bound to apply this Convention
where a State with a unified system of law would not be bound to do so.
Article 34
This Convention shall take priority in matters within its scope over the
Convention of 5 October 1961 concerning the powers of authorities and the law
applicable in respect of the protection of minors, as between Parties to both
Conventions. Otherwise the present Convention shall not restrict the
application of an international instrument in force between the State of
origin
and the State addressed or other law of the State addressed for the purposes
of
obtaining the return of a child who has been wrongfully removed or retained or
of organizing access rights.
Article 35
This Convention shall apply as between Contracting States only to wrongful
removals or retentions occurring after its entry into force in those States.
Where a declaration has been made under Article 39 or 40, the reference in
the preceding paragraph to a Contracting State shall be taken to refer to the
territorial unit or units in relation to which this Convention applies.
Article 36
Nothing in this Convention shall prevent two or more Contracting States, in
order to limit the restrictions to which the return of the child may be
subject, from agreeing among themselves to derogate from any provisions of
this
Convention which may imply such a restriction.
CHAPTER VI
FINAL CLAUSES
Article 37
The Convention shall be open for signature by the States which were Members
of the Hague Conference on Private International Law at the time of its
Fourteenth Session. It shall be ratified, accepted or approved and the
instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with
the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Article 38
Any other State may accede to the Convention.
The instrument of accession shall be deposited with the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
The Convention shall enter into force for a State acceding to it on the
first day of the third calendar month after the deposit of its instrument of
accession.
The accession will have effect only as regard the relations between the
acceding State and such Contracting States as will have declared their
acceptance of the accession.
Such a declaration will also have to be made by any Member State ratifying,
accepting or approving the Convention after an accession. Such declaration
shall be deposited at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the
Netherlands: the Ministry shall forward through diplomatic channels, a
certified copy to each of the Contracting States.
The Convention will enter into force as between the acceding State and the
State that has declared its acceptance of the accession on the first day of
the
third calendar month after the deposit of the declaration of acceptance.
Article 39
Any State may, at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval
or accession, declare that the Convention shall extend to all the territories
for the international relations of which it is responsible, or to one or more
of them. Such a declaration shall take effect at the time the Convention
enters into force for that State.
Such declaration, as well as any subsequent extension, shall be notified to
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Article 40
If a Contracting State has two or more territorial units in which different
systems of law are applicable in relation to matters dealt with in this
Convention, it may at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance,
approval
or accession declare that this Convention shall extend to all its territorial
units or only to one or more of them and may modify this declaration by
submitting another declaration at any time.
Any such declaration shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
of
the Kingdom of the Netherlands and shall state expressly the territorial units
to which the Convention applies.
Article 41
Where a Contracting State has a system of government under which executive,
judicial and legislative powers are distributed between central and other
authorities within that State, its signature or ratification, acceptance or
approval of or accession to this Convention, or its making of any declaration
in terms of Article 40 shall carry no implication as to the internal
distribution of powers within that State.
Article 42
Any State may, not later than the time of ratification, acceptance,
approval
or accession, or at the time of making a declaration in terms of Article 39 or
40 make one or both of the reservations provided for in Article 24 and Article
26, third paragraph. No other reservation shall be permitted.
Any State may at any time withdraw a reservation it has made. The
withdrawal shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom
of the Netherlands. The reservation shall cease to have effect on the first
day of the third calendar month after the notification referred to in the
preceding paragraph.
Article 43
The Convention shall enter into force on the first day of the third
calendar
month after the deposit of the third instruments of ratification, acceptance,
approval or accession referred to in Articles 37 and 38.
Thereafter the Convention shall enter into force-
1 for each State ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to it
subsequently, on the first day of the third calendar month after the deposit
of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession;
2 for any territory or territorial unit to which the Convention has been
extended in conformity with Article 39 or 40, on the first day of the third
calendar month after the notification referred to in that Article.
Article 44
The Convention shall remain in force for five years from the date of its
entry into force in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 43 even for
States which subsequently have ratified, accepted, approved it or acceded to
it.
Any denunciation shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
the
Kingdom of the Netherlands at least six months before the expiry of the five
year period. It may be limited to certain of the territories or territorial
units to which the Convention applies.
The denunciation shall have effect only as regards the State which has
notified it. The Convention shall remain in force for the other Contracting
States.
Article 45
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands shall
notify the States Members of the Conference, and the States which have acceded
in accordance with Article 38, of the following-
1 the signatures and ratifications, acceptances and approvals referred to in
Article 37;
2 the accessions referred to in Article 38;
3 the date on which the Convention enters into force in accordance with
Article
43;
4 the extensions referred to in Article 39;
5 the declarations referred to in Articles 38 and 40;
6 the reservations referred to in Article 24 and Article 26, third paragraph
and the withdrawals referred to in Article 42; and
7 the denunciations referred to in Article 44.
In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have
signed this Convention.
Done at The Hague, on the 25th day of October 1980 in the English and
French
languages, both texts being equally authentic in a single copy which shall be
deposited in the archives of the Government of the Kingdom of the
Netherlands,$
and of which a certified copy shall be sent through diplomatic channels to
each
of the States Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law at
the date of its Fourteenth Session.

Father battles for 3 years to finally see his child. This he did with the help of a social worker, lawyer and the court. He now has regular contact to his child.
Custody, Contact and Guardianship are parental responsibilities of all parents. Once the child is born, both parents not only have a right but a duty to form part of a child’s life. This is also the right of the child. Therefore, a parent cannot deny the other parent from exercising his or her parental responsibilities and rights. The Courts have a duty to ensure that a child’s best interests are met when approached. It is therefore of paramount importance that parents ensure that parental responsibilities and rights are exercise and enforced where necessarily. This includes the responsibility of paying child maintenance. Before we head into the article, let us first outline what the law says on the parental responsibilities of parents. In the end, we will deal with the law regarding the inclusion of a father’s name on the child’s birth certificate. Read further to what the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 says about parental responsibilities and rights. You can skip this section by clicking here.

The Children’s Act 38 of 2005

Section 18 of the Children’s Act 38 of 38 2005 states the following: “(1) A person may have either full or specific parental responsibilities or rights in respect of a child. (2) The parental responsibilities and rights that a person may have in respect of a Child, include the responsibility and the right- (a) To care for the child; (b) To maintain contact with the child; (c) To act as guardian of the child; and (d) To contribute to the maintenance of the child. (3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), a parent or other person who acts as guardian of a child must (a) Administer and safeguard the child’s property and property interests; (b) Assist or represent the child in administrative, contractual and other legal Matters; or (c) Give or refuse any consent required by law in respect of the child, including- (I) consent to the child marriage (ii) Consent to the child adoption; (iii) Consent to the child departure or removal from the Republic; (iv) Consent to the child application for a passport; and (v) Consent to the alienation or encumbrance of any immovable property of the child. (4) Whenever more than one person has guardianship of a child, each one of them is competent, subject to subsection (5), any other law or any order of a competent court to the contrary, to exercise independently and without the consent of the other any right or responsibility arising from such guardianship. (5) Unless a competent court orders otherwise, the consent of all the persons that have guardianship of a child is necessary in respect of matters set out in subsection (3)(c).” [ps2id id=’care-id’ target=”/]

Father’s right to his child

If you are a parent and confronted with a situation where you are denied rights to your child; read on. Notwithstanding this article has been written in relation to the rights of a father; a mother can find it useful too. Mike was a typical office worker, age 25. He lived with his parents and was studying part-time to earn his teaching degree. This is where he met Mary, on a Saturday morning, when visiting the campus library. She was in her final year of medicine. One thing led to another and 6 months later, Mary fell pregnant. Marry came from a wealthy family. Her father was a businessman and her mother a psychology professor. What’s more, Mary was the only child. When her parents found out who the father was, they forbid her to see him. According to them, he was unworthy of their daughter. Read on to find out the meaning of Care and Contact as provide for in the Children’s Act 38 of 2005. You can skip this section by click here.

Meaning of Care

The Children’s Act 38 of 2005 defines care as follows: Care in relation to a child, includes, where appropriate- (a) Within available means, providing the child with- (i) a suitable place to live; (ii) Living conditions that are conducive to the child’s health well-being and development; and (iii) The necessary financial support; (b) Safeguarding and promoting the well-being of the child; (c) protecting the child from maltreatment, abuse, neglect, degradation, discrimination, exploitation and any other physical, emotional or moral harm or hazards; (d) respecting, protecting, promoting and securing the fulfilment of, and guarding against any infringement of, the child rights set out in the Bill of Rights and the principles set out in Chapter 2 of this Act; (e) guiding, directing and securing the child education and upbringing, including religious and cultural education and upbringing, in a manner appropriate to the child age, maturity and stage of development; guiding, advising and assisting the child in decisions to be taken by the child in a manner appropriate to the child age, maturity and stage of development; (g) Guiding the behaviour of the child in a humane manner; (h) Maintaining a sound relationship with the child; (I) accommodating any special needs that the child may have; and (j) Generally, ensuring that the best interests of the child is the paramount Concern in all matters affecting the child;

Contact

According to the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, contact means the following: Contact in relation to a child, means- (a) Maintaining a personal relationship with the child; and (b) If the child lives with someone else- (I) communication on a regular basis with the child in person, including- (AA) visiting the child; or (Bb) being visited by the child; or (ii) Communication on a regular basis with the child in any other manner, Including- (AA) through the post; or (Bb) by telephone or any other form of electronic communication; [ps2id id=’care2-id’ target=”/]

The Pregnancy

Mike tried very hard to find out how the pregnancy was going along. All cell phone calls were blocked and he was refused access to Mary’s home. He felt obligated to make some type of contribution towards the gynaecological and other medical expenses. He spoke to his family about the situation, and they too were very stressed out. This would be the first grandchild and experienced a profound sense of responsibility. They met Mary once and liked her very much. She was smart, pretty and easy going. They then consulted with a family lawyer. The advice was to wait until the child was born and then to enforce parental responsibilities and rights. The lawyer, however, wrote a letter to Mary saying that Mike wants to be part and parcel of the child’s life, even before the birth. Furthermore, Mike wants to contribute towards the medical expenses incurred thus far and any future expenses. Needless to say, the letter was ignored. The Lawyer then advised that they wait until the child was born and then enforce his parental responsibilities and rights.

The Birth and Registration

Obviously, Mike was not at the birth of his child. That saddened him very much. Mike then found out through a friend of Mary that she gave birth to a healthy baby boy. The name Mary gave him was Mark. That was great news for Mike. His parents were also very happy. When Mary registered Mark at the Department of Home Affairs, she did not stipulate that Mike was the father. As Mike thus far did not spend any money on the birth or on his son, he opened an investment account where he deposited money into each month.

Lawyer’s Letter

Mike then set up a meeting with his lawyer. He explained to him that he wanted to see his son, who was almost 2 months old. The lawyer knew this was a sensitive matter, in that nothing was known about the current circumstances of Mary and Mark. They needed to approach this matter very delicately. All that Mike wanted at this stage was to see his son. The lawyer then wrote a letter to Mary asking that his client, Mike, could see Mark for a few minutes at a convenient place and time for Mary. The lawyer made use of the office of the Sheriff to serve the letter to ensure that Mary receives it. On receipt of the latter, Mary showed it to her father. Her father then met with his lawyer. They replied to the letter advising that Mary wants nothing to do with Mike. According to them, it would not be in the child’s best interests for Mike to make any contact with him. They advise that should Mike persist in wanting to meet with Mark, they are instructed to launch an application to the court for harassment.

Legal Advice

Mikes’ lawyer then again advised him of his rights. The difficulty that he had was he knew nothing about the personal circumstances of Mary and Mark. All he knew was that Mark was about 4 months old, living with Mary and her parents. He did not know whether Mary was working or studying, whether Mark was being breastfed and so on. It is therefore difficult to enforce one’s rights, or demand for rights to be enforced under those circumstances. Mike’s lawyer then recommended that a social worker is approached for advice and support on this matter. It is possible that the social worker could mediate the matter.

Social worker

When Mike met with the Social worker he told her everything he knew about Marry and Mark. However, information after the birth of Mark was limited. Basically, all he knew was that he was a boy. He did not even know his son’s date of birth. The Social worker appreciated the sensitivity of the matter. She agreed that due to not knowing what the actual circumstances were, the way forward is challenging. Although Mike is the father of Mark and has parental rights, that should not be enforced without considering Mark’s best interests. The Social worker then agreed that she will try to contact Mary. She sends Mary a letter advising her that she was instructed by Mike to arrange contact between him and his son. Needless to say, Mary did not reply to the letter. The Social worker subsequently decided to call Mary. Mary answered and said she doesn’t want to speak to the social worker and that she must leave her alone. The Social worker then met with Mike and his lawyer, and they concluded that the only way forward was to ask for the help of the Court.

The Court Application

Mikes lawyer then drafted an Urgent Application to the Western Cape High Court. The relief requested was for reasonable supervised contact until Mark is a year old, and then unsupervised contact. What was also requested, was an Order that the Office of the Family Advocate investigates the matter and provide a report to the Court? The Application was filed and served on Mary. Needless to say, she appointed attorneys to oppose the application. Mary submitted an opposing affidavit. Her argument was that Mark does not know his father, and it would be best that he only has contact when he is considerably older. But for now, contact rights should be suspended. Mike obviously replied with a replying affidavit.

First High Court hearing date

On the hearing date, the Court played it safe. The Judge first wanted the Office of the Family Advocate to intervene and provide a report for the Court to consider. Mike’s advocate did not argue with the Judge on this point. The matter was then postponed for a period of 3 months for the report.

Family Advocate’s Report

On the return date, the Court had before it the report of the Office of the Family Advocate. They consulted with Mike and Mary, and it so happens, they came to an agreement regarding phased in contact rights. It was agreed that contact would be exercised at her home, once a week for the first 2 months. Thereafter contact would be every week until Mark is a year old. Once he turns 1, Mike would be able to take Mark with to his home for a period of 4 hours. Further contact would then be relooked at once Mark is 2 years old. At this point, overnight contact may be considered.

Child Maintenance

Mike also offered to pay child maintenance and put Mark on his medical aid as a beneficiary. Mary was happy to hear this as she was the one who solely supported Mark. Her parents were getting fed-up with all the expenses involved.

Next High Court date

The Judge was very happy that the parties came to an agreement. She subsequently made the agreement and Order of Court. According to the report, Mike met Mark at the Office of the family advocate and spent about a half an hour with him. The report also stated that Mike visited Mark at Mary’s home and bonded. Therefore, according to the Court, this was the best type of arrangement as the parties drafted their own agreement. If they did not settle the matter, the Court could make an Order, which both parties may be unhappy with or unwilling to implement. The Court, therefore, made the settlement agreement an Order of Court.

Father’s name on the birth’s registry

Mike exercised contact as per the High Court Order. When he requested Mark’s birth certificate in order to put him on his Medical Aid Scheme, he noticed his name was not on it. Mike then approached the Department of Home Affairs for a change of the birth records. Mary co-operated and the changes were made. Mike was now mentioned as the father on Marks’s birth certificate.

This is the law applicable

Section 11 of the Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992 Section 11 of the Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992 deals with the amendment of birth registration of a child born out of wedlock. An extract of the Act is as follows: Amendment of birth registration of child born out of wedlock (1) Any parent of a child born out of wedlock whose parents married each other after the registration of his or her birth, may, if such child is a minor, or such child himself or herself may, if he or she is of age, apply in the prescribed manner to the Director-General to amend the registration of his or her birth as if his or her parents were married to each other at the time of his or her birth, and thereupon the Director-General shall, if satisfied that the applicant is competent to make the application, that the alleged parents of the child are in fact his or her parents and that they legally married each other, amend the registration of birth in the prescribed manner as if such child’s parents were legally married to each other at the time of his or her birth. (2) If the parents of a child born out of wedlock marry each other before notice of his or her birth is given, notice of such birth shall be given and the birth registered as if the parents were married to each other at the time of his or her birth. (3) … (4) A person who wishes to acknowledge himself to be the father of a child born out of wedlock, may, in the prescribed manner, with the consent of the mother of the child, apply to the Director-General, who shall amend the registration of the birth of such child by recording such acknowledgement and by entering the prescribed particulars of such person in the registration of the birth of such child. (4A) An amendment of the particulars of a person who has acknowledged himself as a father of a child as contemplated in subsection (4) and section 10(1)(b) of the Act shall be supported by the prescribed conclusive proof of that person being the father of the child. (5) Where the mother of a child has not given her consent to the amendment of the registration of the birth of her child in terms of subsection (4), the father of such a child shall apply to the High Court of competent jurisdiction for a declaratory order which confirms his or her paternity of the child and dispenses with the requirement of consent of the mother contemplated in subsection (4). (6) When the court considers the application contemplated in subsection (5) the provisions of section 26(b) of the Children’s Act shall apply.

In conclusion

Although Mike and Mary never became a couple again, they learned to accept the reality of their situation and tried to make the best of it. If there were any issues, they always referred back to the Order the Court made. Even though it took Mike almost 3 years to obtain regular contact, he says it was worth it.

Sharing is Caring

This and other articles and posts found on this website are written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf to assist people with various family law related issues they may have. If you find any of our articles, free resources and posts interesting, or possibly useful to others, please share it on Social Media. Should you require any other legal services and advice, not related to family law, visit Private Legal. Purchase a Consultation with us from our Online Shop, by clicking here.