Divorce Lawyers – Make sure your Attorney or Advocate is on your side

Divorce Lawyer – Divorces need not be difficult. With a large number of marriages ending up in divorce; surely the process should be simple. When a marriage has broken down irretrievably, life needs to go on. It is senseless to make up for your unsuccessful marriage, by trying to have a successful divorce. If there are children involved, there is even more reason not to fight. And if there are no children involved, the only outstanding issues would be property. But if you were married out of Community of Property, there is no need to fight at all. This is where a good divorce lawyer comes in.

Family Law Questions and Answers

Should you not find what you are looking for, feel free to post your questions on our blog, by clicking on the following links:

Divorces – Questions and Answers

Child Custody – Questions and Answers

Child Maintenance – Question and Answers

Domestic Violence – Questions and Answers

You are welcome to call us on 021 424 3487 / 0870735800

For other legal and business services, feel free to visit:

Business SA or Private Legal.

This article does not deal with the procedural aspects of a divorce. Other articles on this website deal with that. The aim of this article is for you to search and find a good divorce lawyer, attorney, or advocate that has your best interests at heard. In other words, not there to make a small fortune off you, at the expense of your well being and that of your family. Below you would find a consent paper, with reasonable terms, that can be customised accordingly.

How should divorce lawyers deal with divorce matters?

Not all divorces are the same. But the reality is, not all divorces need to be a fight. The only persons that benefit from a long drawn out divorce are lawyers. And once the funds dry out, so too does the divorce lawyer’s energy for your case. In our view, the first thing the divorce lawyers should do when approached by a client for a divorce is to resolve it expeditiously. This can be done by trying to call both parties into a round table meeting. This is where all issues are unpacked. If that is not possible, send the other side a reasonable settlement agreement. In that way, before huge sums of money are wasted on legal costs; matters can be resolved in a cost effective manner. Have a look at the Settlement Agreement below which should be part of any good divorce lawyer’s templates. It is reasonable an one that should be accepted by the other side with due amendments. [caption id="attachment_6682" align="alignleft" width="300"]Divorce Attorney Cape Town Divorce Attorney Cape Town[/caption]

EXAMPLE OF A CONSENT PAPER

IN   THE   HIGH   COURT OF SOUTH   AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) CASE NO:          /18 In the matter between:   JOHN SMITH                                                                    PLAINTIFF       and     JANE SMITH                                                                   DEFENDANT     CONSENT PAPER   INTRODUCTION THE PARTIES, as described above, were married to each other on XXX, at XXX, Cape Town, Western Cape, and the marriage still so subsists; THREE (3) MINOR CHILDREN, namely, XXX (hereafter together referred to as “the minor children”), were born from the marriage; THE PARTIES find it unfortunate, and are in agreement that the marriage has broken down irretrievably and that there is no reasonable prospect of the restoration of a normal relationship between them; AND THEREFORE, the Parties both wish for a divorce, dissolving the marriage between them, which divorce both parties would co-operate in finalising as friendly and as speedily as possible; AND WHEREAS the Parties have arrived at an Agreement relating, inter alia, to parental responsibilities and rights, proprietary rights and costs of suit, which agreement the Parties desire to record in writing and have incorporated in the Final Order of Divorce in the event of the above Honourable Court seeing it fit to grant a Final Decree of Divorce dissolving the marriage between the Parties. NOW THEREFORE THESE SAID PARTIES AGREES AS FOLLOWS:
  1. PERSONAL MAINTENANCE
    • Each Party hereby waives his or her claim to personal maintenance, past, present and future from the other Party, if any;
  2. PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND RIGHTS
    • The Parties are to remain co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the minor children in terms of the Children’s Act, 38 of 2005 (“the Children’s Act”) as follows:
      • The Parties are to remain co-holders of guardianship over the minor children as provided for in Section 18(2(c), 18(3), 18(4) and 18(5) of the Children’s Act; and
      • The Parties are to remain co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights of care and contact in respect of the minor children as provided for in Section 18(2)(a) and (b) of the Children’s Act.
    • The Parties’ rights of care and contact shall be implemented as follows:
      • The minor children shall reside primarily with Plaintiff who shall be their primary care-giver; and
      • Defendant shall have reasonable contact with the minor children as follows unless agreed to otherwise between the Parties:
        • Every alternative weekend, commencing from Friday 15:00 until 17:00 on the Sunday;
        • Every Tuesday preceding his weekend of contact from 17:00 to 20:00; and
        • Every Thursday succeeding his weekend of contact from 17:00 to 20:00.
      • School Holidays
        • Equal sharing of long and short school holidays, in that the minor children shall reside one half with Plaintiff and the other with Defendant which shall alternate each year.
      • Special Days Contact
      • The Plaintiff and/or the Defendant, as the case may be, shall further have contact with the minor children on the following days for 3 (three) hours notwithstanding in whose care the minor children are in on those days:
        • Christmas Day;
        • The minor children’s birthday;
        • Father’s Day and Mother’s Day; and
        • The Parties’ birthday.
      • The Parties shall have telephonic contact with the minor children on a regular basis whilst the minor children are in the other’s care;
      • Notwithstanding the above, the Parties shall have reasonable contact with the minor children at all times, provided that any additional contact shall be arranged telephonically and shall only take place by prior arrangement and consensus between the Parties; and
      • The Parties shall respect each other’s privacy and shall not enter each other’s homes at any time without prior invitation, whether for the purpose of fetching or returning the minor children or any other reason whatsoever.
    • JOINT DECISION MAKING
      • The Parties shall make joint decisions about the following aspects of the minor children’s life:
        • Major decisions about the minor children’s schooling and tertiary education;
        • Major decisions about the minor children’s physical care, mental health care and medical care;
        • Major decisions about the minor children’s religious and spiritual upbringing;
        • Decisions about the minor children’s residence both within and outside the Cape Peninsula;
        • Decisions which are likely to significantly change the minor children’s living conditions or to have an adverse effect on their well-being; and
        • Decisions which affect the minor children’s everyday care and daily routine shall be made by the party in whose care the minor children are in at the relevant time.
  1. FACILITATION
    • A facilitator shall be appointed by the parties jointly to facilitate and assist in resolving disputes between the parties relating to the minor children;
    • These disputes shall include contact disputes should one party feel that contact should be increased or decreased, or varied for either party;
    • In the event of the facilitator being unable to continue as facilitator, then he/she shall appoint a facilitator in his/her place, alternatively, or should the parties be unable to agree on the appointment of a facilitator or replacement facilitator, such facilitator or replacement facilitator as the case may be shall be appointed by the chairperson for the time being of FAMAC (Western Cape);
    • In the event of the parties being unable to reach agreement in respect of a dispute, with the assistance of the facilitator, then the facilitator shall be entitled to issue a directive in respect of such dispute which shall be valid of full legal force and effect and binding upon the parties until a court of competent jurisdiction Orders differently;
    • The facilitator shall be entitled in his/her sole discretion to appoint such other person as may be necessary in order to make a decision in respect of the issue in dispute, including the right to co-opt a facilitator or the assistance of an appropriate expert if he/she deems it appropriate or necessary; and
    • The cost of sessions with the facilitator and the services of the expert shall be shared equally between the parties unless otherwise directed by the facilitator. Each Party shall, however, be liable for the facilitator’s costs incurred attendant upon such party’s written and telephonic communications with the facilitator.
  2. CHILD MAINTENANCE
    • Defendant shall pay an amount of R XXX – 00 (XXX Rand) per month per child, in respect of child maintenance;
    • The aforementioned amounts are payable on or before the 1st day of each and every succeeding month from the date of the Divorce. The said sum shall be paid into such bank account as Plaintiff may nominate from time to time;
    • The child maintenance payable shall increase annually on the 1st day of January each year, in accordance with the rise that has taken place in the preceding 12 (Twelve) months in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Republic of South Africa, as determined by the Director of Statistics or its equivalent for persons in the middle-income group;
    • Plaintiff shall retain Alyssa Skye Abrahams, on her current medical aid scheme, or a similar scheme with similar benefits;
    • Defendant shall retain Joel Malcolm Abrahams, on his current medical aid scheme, or similar scheme with similar benefits;
    • Both Parties would be responsible, in equal shares in respect of the minor children for all reasonable medical, psychological, physiotherapy, dental, ophthalmic, pharmaceutical, hospitalization and prescribed medication costs, incurred, and not covered by the latter medical aid schemes.
    • If the minor children display aptitudes and qualify for tertiary education, then both Parties shall be responsible in equal shares for all the costs associated with such tertiary education, which shall include, but not limited to, tuition, textbooks, transport, and boarding if necessary. In this regard, if one Party paid for an educational expense in full, he or she shall accordingly be reimbursed with half the expense within 7 (seven) days of being showed proof of such expense.
  3. THE JOINT ESTATE OF THE PARTIES SHALL BE DIVIDED AS FOLLOWS:
    • Defendant’s Investment Policy
      • XXX
    • MOTOR VEHICLES
      • XXX
  1. BALANCE OF THE JOINT ESTATE
    • The balance of the Joint Estate shall equally be divided between the Parties.
  2. OBLIGATIONS BINDING ON ESTATE
    • The obligations in terms of this Consent Paper shall be binding on the parties’ respective estates, heirs, administrators and/or assigns.
  3. FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT
    • This Agreement is a full and final settlement of all outstanding differences between them, and save as herein provided, neither party shall enjoy any personal claim against the other.
  4. COSTS
    • Each party shall pay their own legal costs associated with the divorce.
   

Divorce Lawyers – Make sure your Attorney or Advocate is on your side

Divorce Lawyer – Divorces need not be difficult. With a large number of marriages ending up in divorce; surely the process should be simple. When a marriage has broken down irretrievably, life needs to go on. It is senseless to make up for your unsuccessful marriage, by trying to have a successful divorce. If there are children involved, there is even more reason not to fight. And if there are no children involved, the only outstanding issues would be property. But if you were married out of Community of Property, there is no need to fight at all. This is where a good divorce lawyer comes in.

Family Law Questions and Answers

Should you not find what you are looking for, feel free to post your questions on our blog, by clicking on the following links:

Divorces – Questions and Answers

Child Custody – Questions and Answers

Child Maintenance – Question and Answers

Domestic Violence – Questions and Answers

You are welcome to call us on 021 424 3487 / 0870735800

For other legal and business services, feel free to visit:

Business SA or Private Legal.

This article does not deal with the procedural aspects of a divorce. Other articles on this website deal with that. The aim of this article is for you to search and find a good divorce lawyer, attorney, or advocate that has your best interests at heard. In other words, not there to make a small fortune off you, at the expense of your well being and that of your family. Below you would find a consent paper, with reasonable terms, that can be customised accordingly.

How should divorce lawyers deal with divorce matters?

Not all divorces are the same. But the reality is, not all divorces need to be a fight. The only persons that benefit from a long drawn out divorce are lawyers. And once the funds dry out, so too does the divorce lawyer’s energy for your case.

In our view, the first thing the divorce lawyers should do when approached by a client for a divorce is to resolve it expeditiously. This can be done by trying to call both parties into a round table meeting. This is where all issues are unpacked. If that is not possible, send the other side a reasonable settlement agreement. In that way, before huge sums of money are wasted on legal costs; matters can be resolved in a cost effective manner.

Have a look at the Settlement Agreement below which should be part of any good divorce lawyer’s templates. It is reasonable an one that should be accepted by the other side with due amendments.

Divorce Attorney Cape Town
Divorce Attorney Cape Town

EXAMPLE OF A CONSENT PAPER

IN   THE   HIGH   COURT OF SOUTH   AFRICA

(WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)

CASE NO:          /18

In the matter between:

 

JOHN SMITH                                                                    PLAINTIFF

 

 

 

and

 

 

JANE SMITH                                                                   DEFENDANT

 

 

CONSENT PAPER

 

INTRODUCTION

THE PARTIES, as described above, were married to each other on XXX, at XXX, Cape Town, Western Cape, and the marriage still so subsists;

THREE (3) MINOR CHILDREN, namely, XXX (hereafter together referred to as “the minor children”), were born from the marriage;

THE PARTIES find it unfortunate, and are in agreement that the marriage has broken down irretrievably and that there is no reasonable prospect of the restoration of a normal relationship between them;

AND THEREFORE, the Parties both wish for a divorce, dissolving the marriage between them, which divorce both parties would co-operate in finalising as friendly and as speedily as possible;

AND WHEREAS the Parties have arrived at an Agreement relating, inter alia, to parental responsibilities and rights, proprietary rights and costs of suit, which agreement the Parties desire to record in writing and have incorporated in the Final Order of Divorce in the event of the above Honourable Court seeing it fit to grant a Final Decree of Divorce dissolving the marriage between the Parties.

NOW THEREFORE THESE SAID PARTIES AGREES AS FOLLOWS:

  1. PERSONAL MAINTENANCE
    • Each Party hereby waives his or her claim to personal maintenance, past, present and future from the other Party, if any;
  2. PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND RIGHTS
    • The Parties are to remain co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the minor children in terms of the Children’s Act, 38 of 2005 (“the Children’s Act”) as follows:
      • The Parties are to remain co-holders of guardianship over the minor children as provided for in Section 18(2(c), 18(3), 18(4) and 18(5) of the Children’s Act; and
      • The Parties are to remain co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights of care and contact in respect of the minor children as provided for in Section 18(2)(a) and (b) of the Children’s Act.
    • The Parties’ rights of care and contact shall be implemented as follows:
      • The minor children shall reside primarily with Plaintiff who shall be their primary care-giver; and
      • Defendant shall have reasonable contact with the minor children as follows unless agreed to otherwise between the Parties:
        • Every alternative weekend, commencing from Friday 15:00 until 17:00 on the Sunday;
        • Every Tuesday preceding his weekend of contact from 17:00 to 20:00; and
        • Every Thursday succeeding his weekend of contact from 17:00 to 20:00.
      • School Holidays
        • Equal sharing of long and short school holidays, in that the minor children shall reside one half with Plaintiff and the other with Defendant which shall alternate each year.
      • Special Days Contact
      • The Plaintiff and/or the Defendant, as the case may be, shall further have contact with the minor children on the following days for 3 (three) hours notwithstanding in whose care the minor children are in on those days:
        • Christmas Day;
        • The minor children’s birthday;
        • Father’s Day and Mother’s Day; and
        • The Parties’ birthday.
      • The Parties shall have telephonic contact with the minor children on a regular basis whilst the minor children are in the other’s care;
      • Notwithstanding the above, the Parties shall have reasonable contact with the minor children at all times, provided that any additional contact shall be arranged telephonically and shall only take place by prior arrangement and consensus between the Parties; and
      • The Parties shall respect each other’s privacy and shall not enter each other’s homes at any time without prior invitation, whether for the purpose of fetching or returning the minor children or any other reason whatsoever.
    • JOINT DECISION MAKING
      • The Parties shall make joint decisions about the following aspects of the minor children’s life:
        • Major decisions about the minor children’s schooling and tertiary education;
        • Major decisions about the minor children’s physical care, mental health care and medical care;
        • Major decisions about the minor children’s religious and spiritual upbringing;
        • Decisions about the minor children’s residence both within and outside the Cape Peninsula;
        • Decisions which are likely to significantly change the minor children’s living conditions or to have an adverse effect on their well-being; and
        • Decisions which affect the minor children’s everyday care and daily routine shall be made by the party in whose care the minor children are in at the relevant time.
  1. FACILITATION
    • A facilitator shall be appointed by the parties jointly to facilitate and assist in resolving disputes between the parties relating to the minor children;
    • These disputes shall include contact disputes should one party feel that contact should be increased or decreased, or varied for either party;
    • In the event of the facilitator being unable to continue as facilitator, then he/she shall appoint a facilitator in his/her place, alternatively, or should the parties be unable to agree on the appointment of a facilitator or replacement facilitator, such facilitator or replacement facilitator as the case may be shall be appointed by the chairperson for the time being of FAMAC (Western Cape);
    • In the event of the parties being unable to reach agreement in respect of a dispute, with the assistance of the facilitator, then the facilitator shall be entitled to issue a directive in respect of such dispute which shall be valid of full legal force and effect and binding upon the parties until a court of competent jurisdiction Orders differently;
    • The facilitator shall be entitled in his/her sole discretion to appoint such other person as may be necessary in order to make a decision in respect of the issue in dispute, including the right to co-opt a facilitator or the assistance of an appropriate expert if he/she deems it appropriate or necessary; and
    • The cost of sessions with the facilitator and the services of the expert shall be shared equally between the parties unless otherwise directed by the facilitator. Each Party shall, however, be liable for the facilitator’s costs incurred attendant upon such party’s written and telephonic communications with the facilitator.
  2. CHILD MAINTENANCE
    • Defendant shall pay an amount of R XXX – 00 (XXX Rand) per month per child, in respect of child maintenance;
    • The aforementioned amounts are payable on or before the 1st day of each and every succeeding month from the date of the Divorce. The said sum shall be paid into such bank account as Plaintiff may nominate from time to time;
    • The child maintenance payable shall increase annually on the 1st day of January each year, in accordance with the rise that has taken place in the preceding 12 (Twelve) months in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Republic of South Africa, as determined by the Director of Statistics or its equivalent for persons in the middle-income group;
    • Plaintiff shall retain Alyssa Skye Abrahams, on her current medical aid scheme, or a similar scheme with similar benefits;
    • Defendant shall retain Joel Malcolm Abrahams, on his current medical aid scheme, or similar scheme with similar benefits;
    • Both Parties would be responsible, in equal shares in respect of the minor children for all reasonable medical, psychological, physiotherapy, dental, ophthalmic, pharmaceutical, hospitalization and prescribed medication costs, incurred, and not covered by the latter medical aid schemes.
    • If the minor children display aptitudes and qualify for tertiary education, then both Parties shall be responsible in equal shares for all the costs associated with such tertiary education, which shall include, but not limited to, tuition, textbooks, transport, and boarding if necessary. In this regard, if one Party paid for an educational expense in full, he or she shall accordingly be reimbursed with half the expense within 7 (seven) days of being showed proof of such expense.
  3. THE JOINT ESTATE OF THE PARTIES SHALL BE DIVIDED AS FOLLOWS:
    • Defendant’s Investment Policy
      • XXX
    • MOTOR VEHICLES
      • XXX
  1. BALANCE OF THE JOINT ESTATE
    • The balance of the Joint Estate shall equally be divided between the Parties.
  2. OBLIGATIONS BINDING ON ESTATE
    • The obligations in terms of this Consent Paper shall be binding on the parties’ respective estates, heirs, administrators and/or assigns.
  3. FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT
    • This Agreement is a full and final settlement of all outstanding differences between them, and save as herein provided, neither party shall enjoy any personal claim against the other.
  4. COSTS
    • Each party shall pay their own legal costs associated with the divorce.

 

 

Related Post

I am not happy with the Court’s decision. I believe it was unfair. What can I do? Can I take the decision on Appeal to the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, or the Constitutional Court?

If you have an issue that can best be resolved through a court of law, then instituting legal proceedings is what you must do. This would apply if someone owed you money, you have a dispute regarding your rights, or you want to have access to your child. If you were a party to a legal matter that was adjudicated in a Court of Law in South Africa, and you are not happy with the outcome, you have a right to appeal the decision. This article deals broadly with the issue of appeal to the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, or the Constitutional Court. Please note the appeal process from the Magistrate’s Court to the High Court is different from that of the High Court to the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court. Therefore, only take this article as a guide. Consult with an attorney or advocate should you require more, and specific information relating to your case.

Trial or Application Court Decision:

The legal process typically begins with a trial or application court, where a judge or magistrate makes a decision on a case. This would be the court of first instance.

Notice of Appeal:

If a party is dissatisfied with the decision of the court of first instance, they may file a notice of appeal within a specified time frame, indicating their intention to appeal. This document should be well drafted as the appeal court, court of first instance, and the parties involved would need to know what is the basis for your appeal.

Obtaining the Record of Proceedings:

The appellant (party filing the appeal) must obtain a complete record of the proceedings from the trial court. This record includes the transcripts, evidence, and other relevant documents. Basically, the appeal court would determine whether the court of first instance erred in its judgment based on the information before it.

Preparation of Appeal Documents:

The appellant, through legal representation, prepares the necessary appeal documents, which typically include a notice of appeal, a concise statement of the grounds of appeal, and other relevant documents.

Filing the Appeal:

The appeal documents are filed with the appropriate appellate court, along with the required fees.

Service on the Other Party:

The appellant is usually required to serve a copy of the appeal documents on the other party or parties involved in the case.

Respondent’s Answering Affidavit:

The respondent (the other party) may file an answering affidavit responding to the grounds of appeal.

Heads of Argument:

Both parties submit written arguments (heads of argument) outlining their legal positions to the court before the appeal hearing. This would assist the appeal court when dealing with the case.

Appeal Hearing:

The appellate court conducts a hearing where both parties present their arguments. The court may ask questions, and the parties or their legal representatives may respond.

Judgment:

The appeal court delivers a judgment either immediately after the hearing or at a later date. The judgment may affirm, set aside, or modify the decision of the trial court.

Further Appeals:

In some cases, there may be the possibility of further appeals to higher courts, such as the Supreme Court of Appeal or the Constitutional Court, depending on the nature of the case. It’s crucial to consult with a legal professional or refer to the latest legal resources for the most up-to-date and accurate information on the appeal process in South Africa. Legal procedures can change, and specific details may vary depending on the type of case and the court involved. If you are unhappy with a court decision and require legal assistance regarding a possible appeal, feel free to contact us for assistance.

What are the Legal Principles applicable to minor Children’s Relocation matters? Are there differences between Local or provincial and International Relocation?

If parents cannot agree on the issue of relocation of minor children with a parent, a court of law would have to step in. If the parent who wishes to relocate is successful, it would mean the other parent would not have contact with the minor child as he or she used to. This is a difficult situation to deal with if you are not the custodial parent of the minor child. For one, you may not see you child face to face every day or every weekend as you used to. You will, therefore unfortunately not see your child grow and be there during his or her various developmental stages in life.

The challenges with minor children relocation matters

That is why relocation matters can be difficult to deal with by the parents due to the high amount of emotions involved. The usual issues that parents would “fight” over are contact and care issues while the parents are living in the same town or suburb. The court would decide whether a parent can see a child from 11:00 or from 14:00 or on a Monday or Sunday. However, in relocation matters, the effect of the court order is that contact would not take place in person, and as often and regularly by the nature of the relief sought.

How contact is exercised when minor children relocation

We do agree that there are other means of contact if relocation is allowed. That includes video contact, text and email etc. The minor child can also visit the parent during school holidays, or the parent can visit the minor child. In the case of international relocation, the option can become very costly and sometimes impossible. Therefore, parties should strongly look into those alternative means of contact in the event the application for relocation is successful.

Minor children relocaiton and the Legal Principles applicable

This article deals with the issue of the best interest of minor children in relocation matters and the principles applicable. Each case is different, just as each family and its dynamics differs vastly from the next. What follows is an extract of a court case that dealt with the issue of relocation. You can apply those principles to your case.

What does our courts say in relocation matters?

In the matter of LW v DB 2020 (1) SA 169 (GJ), the Gauteng High Court dealt with the issue of the best interest of minor children specifically in relocation matters. It outlined the principles that follows.
Principles applicable to relocation of children Certain guidelines may be distilled from the Constitution, judgments of South African courts, and conventions to which South Africa is a signatory: (a) The interests of children are the first and paramount consideration. (b) Each case is to be decided on its own particular facts. (c) Both parents have a joint primary responsibility for raising the child and, where the parents are separated, the child has the right and the parents the responsibility to ensure that contact is maintained. (d) Where a custodial parent wishes to emigrate, a court will not lightly refuse leave for the children to be taken out of the country if the decision of the custodial parent is shown to be bona fide and reasonable. (e) The courts have always been sensitive to the situation of the parent who is to remain behind. The degree of such sensitivity and the role it plays in determining the best interests of children remain a vexed question. The best interests of the child Our courts adhere to the ‘best interests’ approach as they are required to do by the Constitution. On the papers, which include the founding, answering and supplementary affidavits as also the report emanating from the Office of the Family Advocate, reference was made to a number of issues associated with the life, circumstances, wellbeing activities, relationships, dependencies of R — all of which contribute to a greater or lesser extent, and in isolation or in conjunction, to determining his ‘best interests’. Amongst these issues are R’s attachment to both parents and grandparents, the disruption of R’s bond with his father if he were to move to Cape Town, the somewhat conflicted relationship between LW and DB, the demands made on both parents to hold down employment and earn livings to support their child, the arrangements made for the care of R in Vereeniging, Vanderbijlpark and Cape Town, the personal needs and desires of all adults involved in this issue, taking into account the constitutional acknowledgments of the rights of human dignity, freedom and equality. In the unreported judgment dissenting from the majority of the court in Ford v Ford WLD 5001/04, I discussed the manner in which one may attempt to give meaning and content to the concept of the ‘best interests of the child’. The majority of the court expressed no view on this issue and the Supreme Court of Appeal did not disagree therewith. It is convenient to repeat those portions of the judgment which are relevant to the issue before us today. Our law has developed the ‘best interests of the child’ approach which has now been enshrined in the Constitution which, in s 28(2), proclaims that ‘a child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child’. This principle has become known, in one form or another, in many national legal systems and has been recognised in international instruments. However, some writers suggest that the principle has yet to acquire much specific content or to be the subject of any sustained analysis designed to shed light on its precise meaning. The result is that diverse interpretation may be given to the principle in different settings. I suggested that care also be taken to avoid slavish adoption of such content as has been given to specific legislation or instruments, since language, as also constitutional, cultural, familial, social and other traditions, inform contrasting interpretations. The full complexity of the South African Constitution is continually being explored. Section 28(2) and the ‘best interests’ principle do not represent and are not situate within a Constitution which envisages a monolithic or unidimensional approach reflecting a single, unified philosophy of children’s rights. There can be no specific and readily ascertainable recipe for resolving the inevitable tensions and conflicts that arise in each given situation. The respective concerns and entitlements of different actors involved cannot be assumed to always be clearly defined and delineated. In different situations, other interests to be balanced may include, not only the particular child but also siblings, parents, nuclear and extended families and sometimes the local community, society and the state. The ‘best interests’ principle is used to provide a framework for addressing the entire range of major issues affecting children. The principle may be invoked in relation to and in the context of the separation of the child from the family setting, adoption and comparable practices, parental responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child, the child’s involvement with the police and the justice system, the provision of housing and social services, access to schooling and so on.
  If you wish to relocate with your minor child to a different province or abroad, consider the above principles. It would make your case much easier if you understand them.

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!