Family Law Service – Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf – Finding the best lawyer for you.

Choosing the right law firm (Attorney or Advocate) can be a daunting task in the intricate landscape of legal matters. Whether you’re facing a complex litigation case, navigating corporate law, or seeking legal assistance for personal issues, the decision of which law firm to engage is crucial. At the firm Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, we understand the significance of this decision, and we aim to demonstrate why choosing our firm can make all the difference.

Expertise and Specialisation

One of the primary reasons for choosing our law firm is our expertise and specialisation in diverse legal areas. As you can see from this website, Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf practices in various fields of law. This breadth of expertise ensures that no matter the nature of your legal issue, you will have access to knowledgeable and experienced professionals who can provide tailored solutions.

Personalised Approach

We recognise that every client and every case is unique. That’s why we prioritise a personalised approach to legal representation. From the moment you engage our services, we take the time to understand your specific needs, concerns, and objectives. This allows us to develop strategies and solutions customised to your circumstances, ensuring the best possible outcome for your case.

Commitment to Excellence

At Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, excellence is not just a goal – it’s our standard. We are committed to providing our clients with the highest quality legal services, characterized by thorough research, meticulous attention to detail, and strategic thinking. Our track record of success speaks for itself, with numerous satisfied clients who have benefited from our dedication to excellence.

Responsive and Accessible

Legal matters can be stressful and overwhelming, so we prioritise responsiveness and accessibility. Our team is readily available to address your questions, concerns, and needs throughout your case. Whether you prefer to communicate via phone, WhatsApp, email, or in-person meetings, we are here to provide you with the support and guidance you need when you need it.

Cost-Effective Solutions

Legal representation shouldn’t break the bank. That’s why we are committed to providing cost-effective solutions that deliver value for our clients. We offer transparent billing practices and strive to minimise unnecessary expenses wherever possible, ensuring you receive top-notch legal services without the hefty price tag.

Ethical and Professional Conduct

Integrity and ethics are at the core of everything we do. Our team adheres to the highest standards of professional conduct, ensuring your case is handled with the utmost integrity, honesty, and discretion. You can trust that your legal matters will be handled with care and respect, and your confidentiality will always be protected. In conclusion, choosing the right law firm can significantly impact the outcome of your legal matters. At Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, we offer expertise, specialisation, personalised service, commitment to excellence, responsiveness, cost-effective solutions, and ethical conduct. These qualities set us apart and make us the ideal choice for clients seeking top-notch legal representation. Contact us today to learn how we can assist you with your legal needs. If you require an Advocate Law Firm to assist you in your legal matter, feel free to contact us using the following details:

• • Tel.: 021 111 0090
  • Email.: [email protected]

The Firm: Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf

Trust Account Advocate. Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf is a registered firm with the Legal Practice Council of South Africa. It holds offices in Cape Town. However represents clients all over South Africa. If required, he would travel out to your province to attend to you matter. Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf is a Trust Account practice, which means it may take instructions directly from members of the public. This is compared to referral advocates who may not take instructions directly from members of the public. Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf’s practice allows clients to deposit money into their Trust Account. To do so, it needs to hold a valid fidelity fund certificate, which it does. Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf may appear on its client’s behalf in all courts in the Republic of South Africa. These include the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court of Appeal, all High Court and magistrates courts in all provinces in South Africa. The services you may instruct the firm of Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf to represent you in are as follows:

High Court matters

• Civil claim surrounding money;
• Interdicts;
• Divorces (Opposed and unopposed);
• Child Custody and guardianship disputes;
• Relocation of minor children;
• Various criminal matters;
• Minor children surname changes;
• Appeals and Reviews; and
• Other matters.

Magistrates Court matters

• Civil claim surrounding money;
• Various criminal matters;
• Interdicts;
• Maintenance Court matters;
• Divorces Court matters (Opposed and unopposed)’
• Children’s Court matter; and
• Other matters.

Constitutional Court

• Appeals

Supreme Court of Appeal

• Appeals and Reviews

Consult with, or Instruct Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf

If you would like to have a legal advice consultation with Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, feel free to use the Our Lawyer online appointment form by clicking here. Should you already have consulted with Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf and wish to mandate and instruct the firm, kindly proceed with completing the mandate form using this mandate link. We service clients throughout South Africa. These include: Cape Town Rustenburg Kimberley East London Nelspruit Polokwane Pietermaritzburg Bloemfontein Port Elizabeth Pretoria Durban Johannesburg

Various Matrimonial Property Regimes focusing on the Accrual System

Getting married is a legal act. With it comes certain responsibilities and rights. For example, you have a legal obligation to maintain your spouse. You cannot marry anyone else, and furthermore, your spouse can inherit from you interstate. Depending on the matrimonial property regime you entered into, certain legal consequences would apply regarding the proprietary (or money) aspects of your marriage. For example, to whom do money and assets belong to acquired during the marriage and before it. In South Africa, a person has three (3) choices when it comes to getting married in relation to your matrimonial property regime. They are explained briefly below. In Community of Property (Default system) A marriage in community of property is the default matrimonial property regime. You do not need to enter into an antenuptial contract in order to be married like this. Basically, when getting married, both spouses’ assets, money, liabilities and so on becomes one single joint estate. You can compare it to placing it all in one pot. And from that pot would the spouse’s finances be dealt with. If either spouse gets themselves into financial trouble, it is the joint estate, or the pot that would have to be looked at in order to sort it out. This would apply to financial trouble which arose even before the marriage.   Lastly, at death or divorce, the joint estate, or the pot would be divided and each party’s estate would leave with half. If you are worried about the financial implications of your marriage, you need to read further. Out of Community of Property and Profit or Loss (Without Accrual) Being married out of community of property and profit or loss is basically the exact opposite of being married in community of property. Here we are dealing with out of community of property with the exclusion of the accrual regime. Under this matrimonial property regime, there remain two separate estates just as there was before the spouses got married. Each spouse is responsible for their own wealth and debt. Creditors can therefore only claim from the estate of the relevant spouse. Not the other. At death or divorce, the situation remains exactly the same. Each estate leaves with whatever it has, being it money, assets or debt. In order for a couple to be married out of community of property and profit or loss, they need to stipulate it in an antenuptial contract and have it registered. The antenuptial contract would be executed before a Notary Public and registered at the Deeds Office. If this is not done,  then the marriage would be In Community of Property as above.  Next, we deal with a hybrid regime. You may find it more beneficial to you. Read more on antenuptial contracts by clicking here. Out of Community of Property and Profit or Loss (With Accrual) The third option a couple has is to get married out of community of property and profit or loss with the inclusion of the accrual regime. The accrual regime or system is outlined in the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984. Basically, what it entails is that during the marriage you are married out of community of property and profit or loss as in the latter section, but at divorce or death, you share in the accrual or profits of the marriage. Each spouse still retains full control over their assets and estate during the marriage. Just as out of community of property and profit or loss without the accrual. If, however, the parties divorce or one dies, they will share in the accrual or profits. If you want the accrual regime to apply to your marriage, that would be stated in your antenuptial contract. It would then also be registered at the Deeds Office. In order to work out the accrual, one needs to know the net commencement value of each party’s estate. That would be stipulated in the antenuptial contract. The Accrual system is regulated in Chapter 1 of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984. In terms of the Act, certain items are excluded when calculating the accrual unless otherwise agreed upon. This is dealt with next.

Items or amounts excluded in the accrual calculation (unless otherwise agreed upon)

1. Amounts which accrued to that estate by way of damages, other than damages for patrimonial loss. E.g. pain and suffering;
2. An asset which has been excluded from the accrual system in terms of the antenuptial contract of the spouses, as well as any other asset which he or she acquired by virtue of his or her possession or former possession of the first-mentioned asset;
3. An inheritance, a legacy or a donation which accrues to a spouse during the subsistence of his or her marriage, as well as any other asset which he acquired by virtue of his or her possession or former possession of such inheritance, legacy or donation (except in so far as the spouses may agree otherwise in their antenuptial contract or in so far as the testator or donor may stipulate otherwise);
4. Donations between spouses, other than a donation mortis causa [anticipation of the death of the donor], is not taken into account either as part of the estate of the donor or as part of the estate of the donee.

Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984

Senior family law expert giving the best simple advice on International Relocation of minor children – Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf

International Relocation matters concerning minor children is one category of our law that requires more attention than other categories of family law. If you intend to relocate overseas with your minor child or do not want your minor child to relocate with the other parent, this article is for you. Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf is a senior family law expert with over twenty years of experience in Family law. He runs a Law Firm styled Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf in Cape Town. He is a Trust Account Advocate. What this means, he takes on work from members of the public directly. Other advocates need to be instructed by an attorney to act in your case.

When does the relocation of minor children disputes arise?

The starting point is that parents and their children live in South Africa. A parent, usually the primary caregiver, wants to relocate with the minor child to another country. For this example, we will assume both parents are co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights of guardianship over the specific minor child. For the minor child to leave the Republic of South Africa and relocate with the other parent overseas, the guardianship consent of the parent remaining in South Africa would be required. This is a requirement as provided for in section 18 of the Children’s Act. A dispute arises if the parent remaining in South Africa does not consent to the relocation of the minor child to a different country. This is so as, without a court order stating otherwise, the minor child would not be allowed to relocate overseas.

When should a parent approach the Court in an international relocation matter involving a minor child?

In principle, anyone can approach a court for any matter. However, not everyone would be successful in their case. Therefore, before you approach the Court for consent for the minor child to relocate with you to a different country, you must make sure you have a strong case. On the other hand, if you are a parent whose consent is required and do not want to provide it, you must ensure you have a reason for refusing it. If, however, you do have a strong case, as we would explain further below, for the relocation, then in that case, you should approach the Court.

The best interests of the child’s principle

Both the South African Constitution and the Children’s Act clearly state that a child’s best interests are the most critical factor when it comes to it. In other words, not the best interests of the parents, but the best interests of the child. However, there are cases where upholding the interests of a parent would be in the minor child’s best interests. For example, a much better job offer. In relocation matters, if the parents cannot agree on the relocation of the minor child, then the Court would intervene and only direct that the relocation is authorised if it is of the view that it would be in the minor child’s best interests.

What do I present to the Court regarding international relocation matters?

According to Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, the reason why people relocate is vast. For most, it is for work or a better life; for others, it is related to going back home or living with a spouse or a loved one. However, that is the reason why the parents want to relocate. Whatever the reason, you need to demonstrate that the minor child would not be in a worse position after the relocation. Therefore, you would have to demonstrate that there would be adequate housing, food, education, medical services and so on after the relocation. In other words, the minor child would not be neglected and would have a good life with his or her primary caregiver.

What can I do if I do not want the relocation to take place?

It is scarce where the non-primary caregiver wants to relocate with the minor child. However, given the correct facts and circumstances, it is possible. In this example, the primary caregiver wants to relocate with the minor child, and the parent remaining behind does not want to consent. That parent must show that it would not be in the minor child’s best interests to relocate. The parent may even go as far as to show that they can care well enough for the minor child in South Africa and that the de facto primary caregiver is welcome to relocate without the minor child.

When do I approach the Court?

As already alluded to above, if the parents cannot come to an agreement regarding the relocation of the minor child to a different country, then in that case, the Court should be approached. It is best to make use of an experienced family lawyer (attorney or Trust Account Advocate). Both parents would provide information in the form of affidavits to the Court as to reasons for the relocation and/or the refusal thereof. In many cases, the Court would appoint the Office of the Family to get involved and do an investigation as to what is in the minor child’s best interests. The Court would then make a ruling on the relocation of the minor child to a foreign country.