Related Post

ABC Steps to Appealing to the Constitutional Court of South Africa

If you are unhappy with a Court’s decision, you have a right to take the decision on appeal. Section 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996)  states: This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic; law or conduct inconsistent with it is invalid, and the obligations imposed by it must be fulfilled. Therefore, any act of parliament (e.g. Legislation) or decision of the government must be in conformity with the rights and obligations entrenched in our Constitution. In South Africa, we have the Constitutional Court. This is stated in Section 166 of our Constitution. Section 167 of the Constitution, with its subsections, states the following:
  1. The Constitutional Court consists of the Chief Justice of South Africa, the Deputy Chief Justice and nine other judges.
  2. A matter before the Constitutional Court must be heard by at least eight judges.
  3. The Constitutional Court ­
  4. is the highest court of the Republic; and
  5. may decide
  6. constitutional matters; and
  7. any other matter, if the Constitutional Court grants leave to appeal on the grounds that the matter raises an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by that Court; and
  8. makes the final decision whether a matter is within its jurisdiction. 
  9. Only the Constitutional Court may ­
  10. decide disputes between organs of state in the national or provincial sphere concerning the constitutional status, powers or functions of any of those organs of state;
  11. decide on the constitutionality of any parliamentary or provincial Bill, but may do so only in the circumstances anticipated in section 79 or 121;
  12. decide applications envisaged in section 80 or 122;
  13. decide on the constitutionality of any amendment to the Constitution;
  14. decide that Parliament or the President has failed to fulfil a constitutional obligation; or
  15. certify a provincial constitution in terms of section 144. 
  16. The Constitutional Court makes the final decision whether an Act of Parliament, a provincial Act or conduct of the President is constitutional, and must confirm any order of invalidity made by the Supreme Court of Appeal, the High Court if South Afirca, or a court of similar status, before that order has any force.
  17. National legislation or the rules of the Constitutional Court must allow a person, when it is in the interests of justice and with leave of the Constitutional Court ­
  18. to bring a matter directly to the Constitutional Court; or
  19. to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court from any other court. 
  20. A constitutional matter includes any issue involving the interpretation, protection or enforcement of the Constitution.
Therefore, if you want to challenge a court’s decision on a Constitutional basis, the highest court you can go to is the Constitutional Court.

How do I take a matter to the Constitutional Court?

The Constitutional Court has its own rules. Therein, you would find the procedure to follow when bringing a matter to the Constitutional Court. Constitutional Court Rule 19 deals with Appeals. It states the following:
  1. Appeals
(1) The procedure set out in this rule shall be followed in an application for leave to appeal to the Court where a decision on a constitutional matter, other than an order of constitutional invalidity under section 172(2)(a) of the Constitution, has been given by any court including the Supreme Court of Appeal, and irrespective of whether the President has refused leave or special leave to appeal. (2) A litigant who is aggrieved by the decision of a court and who wishes to appeal against it directly to the Court on a constitutional matter shall, within 15 days of the order against which the appeal is sought to be brought and after giving notice to the other party or parties concerned, lodge with the Registrar an application for leave to appeal: Provided that where the President has refused leave to appeal the period prescribed in this rule shall run from the date of the order refusing leave. (3) An application referred to in subrule (2) shall be signed by the applicant or his or her legal representative and shall contain— (a) the decision against which the appeal is brought and the grounds upon which such decision is disputed; (b) a statement setting out clearly and succinctly the constitutional matter raised in the decision; and any other issues including issues that are alleged to be connected with a decision on the constitutional matter; (c) such supplementary information or argument as the applicant considers necessary to bring to the attention of the Court; and (d) a statement indicating whether the applicant has applied or intends to apply for leave or special leave to appeal to any other court, and if so— (i) which court; (ii) whether such application is conditional upon the application to the Court being refused; and (iii) the outcome of such application, if known at the time of the application to the Court. (4) (a) Within 10 days from the date upon which an application referred to in subrule (2) is lodged, the respondent or respondents may respond thereto in writing, indicating whether or not the application for leave to appeal is being opposed, and if so the grounds for such opposition. (b) The response shall be signed by the respondent or respondents or his or her or their legal representative. (5) (a) A respondent or respondents wishing to lodge a cross-appeal to the Court on a constitutional matter shall, within 10 days from the date upon which an application in subrule (2) is lodged, lodge with the Registrar an application for leave to cross-appeal. (b) The provisions of these rules with regard to appeals shall apply, with necessary modifications, to cross-appeals. (6) (a) The Court shall decide whether or not to grant the appellant leave to appeal. (b) Applications for leave to appeal may be dealt with summarily, without receiving oral or written argument other than that contained in the application itself. (c) The Court may order that the application for leave to appeal be set down for argument and direct that the written argument of the parties deal not only with the question whether the application for leave to appeal should be granted, but also with the merits of the dispute. The provisions of rule 20 shall, with necessary modifications, apply to the procedure to be followed in such procedures. As you would note, you should first obtain leave to appeal. Once that has been granted, you can then go ahead with the next steps.

What is the procedure once leave to appeal has been granted?

Rule 20 of the Constitutional Court Rules deals with the Procedure on Appeal. It states:
  1. Procedure on appeal
(1) If leave to appeal is given in terms of rule 19, the appellant shall note and prosecute the appeal as follows— (a) The appellant shall prepare and lodge the appeal record with the Registrar within such time as may be fixed by the Chief Justice in directions. (b) Subject to the provisions of subrule (1)(c) below, the appeal record shall consist of the judgment of the court from which the appeal is noted, together with all the documentation lodged by the parties in that court and all the evidence which may have been led in the proceedings and which may be relevant to the issues that are to be determined. (c) (i) The parties shall endeavour to reach agreement on what should be included in the record and, in the absence of such agreement, the appellant shall apply to the Chief Justice for directions to be given in regard to the compilation of the record. (ii) Such application shall be made in writing and shall set out the nature of the dispute between the parties in regard to the compilation of the record and the reasons for the appellant’s contentions. (iii) The respondent may respond to the application within 10 days of being served with the application and shall set out the reasons for the respondent’s contentions. (iv) The Chief Justice may assign the application to one or more judges, who may deal with the matter on the papers or require the parties to appear before him or her or them on a specified day and at a specified time to debate the compilation of the record. (v) The judge or judges concerned shall give directions in regard to the compilation of the record, the time within which the record is to be lodged with the Registrar and any other matters which may be deemed by him or her or them to be necessary for the purpose of enabling the Court to deal with the appeal, which directions may include that the matter be referred back to the court a quo for the hearing of additional evidence specified in the directions, or that additional evidence be put before the Court by way of affidavit or otherwise for the purpose of the appeal. (2) (a) One of the copies of the record lodged with the Registrar shall be certified as correct by the Registrar of the court appealed from. (b) Copies of the record shall be clearly typed on stout A4-size paper, double-spaced in black record ink, on one side of the paper only. (c) Legible documents that were typed or printed in their original form such as cheques and the like shall not be retyped and clear photocopies on A4-size paper shall be provided instead. (d) The pages shall be numbered clearly and consecutively and every tenth line on each page shall be numbered and the pagination used in the court a quo shall be retained where possible. (e) Bulky records shall be divided into separate conveniently-sized volumes of approximately 100 pages each. The record shall be securely bound in book format to withstand constant use and shall be so bound that upon being used will lie open without manual or other restraint. (f) All records shall be securely bound in suitable covers disclosing the case number, names of the parties, the volume number and the numbers of the pages contained in that volume, the total number of volumes, the court a quo and the names of the attorneys of the parties. (g) The binding required by this rule shall be sufficiently secure to ensure the stability of the papers contained within the volume; and where the record consists of more than one volume, the number of each volume and the number of the pages contained in a volume shall appear on the upper third of the spine of the volume. (h) Where documents are lodged with the Registrar, and such documents are recorded on a computer disk, the party lodging the document shall where possible also make available to the Registrar a disk containing the file in which the document is contained, or transmit an electronic copy of the document concerned by e-mail in a format determined by the Registrar which is compatible with software that is used by the Court at the time of lodgement, to the Registrar at: [email protected]: Provided that the transmission of such copy shall not relieve the party concerned from the obligation under rule 1(3) to lodge the prescribed number of hard copies of the documents so lodged. (i) If a disk is made available to the Registrar the file will be copied and the disk will be returned to the party concerned. Where a disk or an electronic copy of a document other than a record is provided, the party need lodge only 13 copies of the document concerned with the Registrar. (3) If a record has been lodged in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of subrule (1), the Registrar shall cause a notice to be given to the parties to the appeal requiring— (a) the appellant to lodge with the Registrar written argument in support of the appeal within a period determined by the Chief Justice and specified in such notice; and (b) the respondent to lodge with the Registrar written argument in reply to the appellant’s argument by a specified date determined by the Chief Justice, which shall be subsequent to the date on which the appellant’s argument was served on the respondent. (4) The appellant may lodge with the Registrar written argument in answer to the respondent’s argument within 10 days from the date on which the respondent’s argument was served on the appellant. (5) The Chief Justice may decide whether the appeal shall be dealt with on the basis of written arguments only. (6) Subject to the provisions of subrule (5), the Chief Justice shall determine the date on which oral argument will be heard, and the Registrar shall within five days of such determination notify all parties to the appeal of the date of the hearing by registered post or facsimile.

What are the Steps in Summary:

  1. Within 15 days of the Order you are appealing against, lodged you Application for leave to appeal [Rule 19(2)]
  2. Within 10 days, the Respondent is to file its Notice to Oppose the appeal and the grounds for the opposition [Rule 19(4)(a)]
  3. The Constitutional Court would then decide whether or not to grant the leave to Appeal [Rule 19(6)(a)]
  4. If leave to appeal is granted, the appellant shall prepare and lodge the appeal record with the Registrar [Rule 20(1)(a)]
  5. The Chief Justice may decide whether the appeal shall be dealt with based on written arguments only [Rule 20(5)]
  6. The matter would be argued on the date provided by the Constitutional Court.

Best of luck with your appeal.

Posted on by Telelaw

Child custody appeals from the Children’s Court to the High Court of South Africa

This article deals with an appeal from the Children’s Court to the High Court. I’ve never been one to complain of my legal situation. The father of my daughter, and I have always had a cordial relationship. Until recently, the father of my minor child paid child support, and he would have contact with her regularly. However, what the father has done recently was approach the children’s court and make false allegations that I have been refusing him contact with his minor daughter. This was not to be done, and I could not allow him to continue lying to the court.

Our past relationship before approaching the Children’s Court

To give some context, the father of my minor child and I met 12 years ago. Soon after, I fell pregnant, and my minor child was born. The father was not involved much in the minor child’s life until soon after she was born. He only met the minor child for the first time when she was about seven months old. He saw her at least once a year until she started attending school. At this time, I approached him for child maintenance because he had not been paying adequate child maintenance for the minor child.

Approaching the Maintenance Court and the Children’s Court

We then approached the maintenance court, and the maintenance court ordered that he pay half the minor child’s school fees, place her on his medical aid, and pay a cash contribution towards her daily expenditure. At the same time, we also approached the children’s court, which assisted us in drafting a parenting plan. The father would see the minor child every second weekend from a Friday until late Sunday as well as one evening in the week. We would also share half the school holidays as well as special days. This would include the minor child‘s birthday, Father’s Day, Mother’s Day, and so on.

Father wanting every weekend with teh minor child

All went well regarding visitation until about a year ago. The father said I am limited his contact regarding the minor child. He wanted to have her on weekends with her as well. Me not agreeing to is, according to him, is refusing him contact. I told him that I also need time with the minor child on weekends. I already care for the child during the week. I attend to her homework and all her needs. At least two weekends a month, I require time to go out with her, take her to the beach, maybe watch a movie, and have some fun time together.

Father approaches the Children’s Court for a variation of the Parenting Plan

It is unfair that he should have the minor child every weekend and not take care of her during the week. Furthermore, the care and contact arrangement that is in place was finalised with the children’s court. I was therefore acting in terms of a court order. The father then approached the children’s court, and we had a hearing date. The matter proceeded to the children’s court magistrate, who heard both parties.

Decision of the Children’s Court

At the end of the enquiry, the children’s court made an order that the father may have the minor child in his care for three weekends per month. What the children’s court did not do was ask the minor child what the minor child wanted. Furthermore, it has not appointed a legal representative for the minor child. Lastly, there was no expert recommendation on this matter. For example, the children’s court did not appoint the office of all the family advocates, or are you a social worker to investigate this matter?

Appealing to the High Court regarding the Children’s Court decision

They failed to consider various factors and assistance from other parties that would assist the court in determining the minor child’s best interest. I then sought the assistance of an attorney, who advised me that I would need to appeal the children’s court’s decision. We then requested reasons for the children’s court decision. In short, the children’s court magistrate was of the view that the minor child does not need to spend so much time with me on the weekend, seeing that I am already caring for her during the week.

High Court dealing with the Appeal from the Children’s Court

The matter then proceeded to the High Court. The High Court took issue with the fact that the children’s court had not consulted with the minor child, has not obtained the assistance of the office of all the family advocates or a social worker, nor has the children’s court appointed a legal representative to the minor child to determine what the minor child’s view and wishes are. The High Court ordered that the care and contact arrangement that was in place should remain.

Possitive outcome of the Appeal to the High Court

I was thrilled that I took the matter to the High Court and appealed the children’s court decision. Had I not decided to take the magistrate to the children’s court on appeal, the father of the minor child would’ve had three weekends a month with the minor child and me only one. This, I believe, would have been unfair.

Assistance with an Appeal to the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal or the Constitutional Court

Should you require assistance with an Appeal to the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal or the Constitutional Court, feel free to connect with the firm of Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf.    

Posted on by Telelaw

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!