Child Adoption, inter-country adoption, adoption process, adoption, Cape Town, South Africa
Related Post
The Court Order says my minor child’s mother has custody, but my daughter primarily lived with me since she was a toddler. What can I do to legalise the situation? The mother is now demanding that the order now be followed – 5 years later.
[video width="1920" height="1080" mp4="https://www.ourlawyer.co.za/wp-content/uploads/Child-Custody-Visitation-and-Contact.mp4"][/video] At the time of a divorce or separation, the parents of a minor child would usually agree on where the minor child would primarily reside. If they cannot come to an agreement, the Court would make that decision for them. If the parents were never married, one of them may have approached the Court. This is to deal with their parental responsibilities and rights.Parents not following Court Order
What often happens is a Court would order that one parent has primary care over a minor child, but that specific parent does not take on that responsibility. In other words, the minor child would live primarily with the parent who does not have custody. The parent who has custody would then only occasionally have contact with the minor child. This is so despite the Court Order stating that the minor child should primarily live with him or her. This becomes problematic, as the Court Order says one thing, but the parents are doing the opposite. 
Parenting disagreements despite a Court Order
Should the parents come to a disagreement in the future, the parent who has primary care in terms of a Court Order may demand to exercise his or her rights as the primary caregiver. The parent who has primary care in terms of the Court Order may even threaten to take legal action to enforce the Order. This situation may be problematic as the minor child may have been living for a very long time with the non-custodial parent, enrolled in the nearby school, have friends there, etc. This would all be uprooted should the order now be followed many years later. The minor child would have to be enrolled in a new school, and furthermore, the new home may not be adequate for the minor child’s needs.The Child Custody Court Order and its compliance
Once a Court makes an order, it should be complied with. Nothing less applies in the case of a Court order regarding a minor child. Once the minor child becomes an adult, the order basically falls away, unless they are provisions that still lives on. For example, a provision that states that child maintenance should be paid to the mother until the minor child turns 21 or is self-supporting, and so on. But should the child be a minor (under the age of 18 years old), the parental responsibilities and rights as outlined in the Court order would usually apply. Therefore, unless the Court order lapsed, it needs to be complied with. 
What can a parent do under the latter situation?
The first port of call would be to have a look at the Court order and see what it obliges the parents to do in this situation. This can either be facilitation or mediation. If that fails, or no such provision exists, then making an application to the Court to vary the Order would be the appropriate remedy. This basically entails filing a Notice of Motion, attached to it, a Founding Affidavit. The Notice of Motion will state what you want. The Founding Affidavit would state the facts substantiating the relief you are looking for.The relief sought
The relief a parent may want from the Court would be that a certain clause in the Court Order is varied. It should state that primary care is awarded to the father (or the mother as the case may be). It would further outline what contact rights the parent who had primary care in terms of the order would have. Usually, it would follow what the parties have been exercising in the past.What would the Court decide regarding custody?
[caption id="attachment_8258" align="alignleft" width="476"]
Child Custody Visitation and Contact[/caption] The Court is the upper guardian of all minor children within its jurisdiction. It, therefore, can override the wishes of the parents. However, the Court has to comply with the Constitution and the Children’s Act. Both pieces of legislation say that the minor child’s best interests must be upheld when it comes to these types of issues. Therefore, the Court would look at all the relevant facts. It would then make a decision as to what is best for the minor child concerned. The Court would look at the Order and whether it has been complied with. Thereafter it would decide whether a change to it would be warranted. The Court is also not obliged to make an order based on what the parents in the case want. It would make a decision as to what it believes is in the minor child’s best interests.
We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws
Posted on by Telelaw
How do I obtain contact, custody or visitation to my child? I need some advice and assistance.
Issues of child custody, visitation or guardianship rights are usually difficult for parents to deal with. Parents have an inherent right and duty to form part of their child’s lives. Here we refer to parental rights and responsibilities. However, it often happens that parents of a child cannot see eye to eye as to what is in their child’s best interests. More often than not, when parents are divorced, separated, or not living together, issues arise regarding the children they share. And then there is the case where parents want full custody over their children. These issues may range from the amount of contact the other parent may have, the school the child may attend, or what extra-mural activities the child should pursue. Either way, should parents not be on the same page, outside help may be required. Read on to find out more about the law, factors and your rights. With some advice, your situation may become easier.What are Parental Responsibilities and rights to a child?
Know your rights: The terms used to refer to the rights and responsibilities of parents to their children are referred to as “parental responsibilities and rights”. Parental responsibilities and rights are defined in the Children’s Act. Section 18 of the Children’s Act of 38 2005 (the Children’s Act) states the following:
18. (1) A person may have either full or specific parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child.
(2) The parental responsibilities and rights that a person may have in respect of a
child, include the responsibility and the right-
(a) to care for the child;
(b) to maintain contact with the child;
(c) to act as guardian of the child; and
(d) to contribute to the maintenance of the child.When do parents need to enter into a Parenting Plan?
Mediate the issue: Not going into too much detail, all parents of children should by default have certain parental responsibilities and rights to their children. It often happens that parents who are co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights are unable to agree on how their rights should be exercised. Should that happen, then according to section 33 and 34 of the Children’s Act, they should try to agree on a parenting plan. See an expert: Basically, they should see an expert like a social worker, or psychiatrist assist them in resolving the issues they have. As long as the person is suitably qualified, they may make use of their services. They may even approach the Office of the Family Advocate. Should all go well, a parenting plan would be drafted and entered into. This parenting plan may either be registered with the Office of the Family Advocate or made an Order of Court.When should parents approach the Child Custody Court? High Court or Children’s Court
If parents cannot agree on a parenting plan, then a court may have to be approached. Usually, they would approach the High Court or the Children’s Court in their area of residence. In South Africa, one does not have to make use of legal representation. In other words, you may represent yourself in Court. Many times, you do not have a choice as you cannot afford legal representation. If you can afford legal representation, we advise you to make use of it.What is the Children’s Court?
Each magisterial area has a children’s court dealing with Children’s matters. The Children’s Court would be best suited for parents who would prefer to conduct their own case. When you approach the children’s court, they provide you with forms to fill in. They would basically assist you with the process. They will issue a summons/notice to the other parent to appear at Court. Many attorneys also make use of the Children’s Court, as opposed to the High Court, when enforcing their client’s parental responsibilities and rights. Purchase a Consultation with us from our Online Shop, by clicking here.What is the High Court?
Each province has a High Court. The Court procedure in the High Court is much more complicated than that of the Children’s Court. If you can afford an attorney, and an advocate, they the High Court is another option. Specific documentation needs to be drafted. One is called a Notice of Motion, and the other, a founding Affidavit.What are the serious parental issues the Court looks at?
There are various pertinent issues the court looks at when deciding how contact or visitation should be exercised. Each case is unique. In this article, we will list factors that may limit the exercising of your parental right of contact or care. They are:Child Abuse
- Child abuse has many facets. It is not only physical but psychological and emotional a swell.
Unfit parenting
- Not all parents are fit enough to care for a child primarily. This is especially so if there is a history of irresponsible parenting.
Living Conditions
- The law in no way discriminates against parents based on their living conditions. However, it is a factor to consider in Child Custody Cases.
Psychiatric disorders
- Psychiatric disorders in many cases play a role in deciding how care and contact should be exercised. If the condition is bad, a court would have to factor it in when making its decision.
How does the Court come to its decision?
The Court (Children’s Court as well as the High Court) would listen to both parents and any expert appointment. Usually, the expert would provide a report. Many times, they are the office of the family advocate or a state-appointed social worker. After looking at, and hearing everything, the court would make a decision based on what is in the child’s best interest. This article has been updated. We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws
Posted on by Telelaw
I Appealed my divorce court’s decision regarding care and contact for my two minor children to the High Court. I was successful.
After a 12-year marriage, which was in community of property, and raising two minor children, I was compelled to initiate divorce proceedings due to severe issues, including gambling, alcohol abuse, and infidelity on my husband’s part. This caused me to leave the marital home with my minor children three years ago. Since our separation, I have been the sole caregiver for our two minor children, ages 10 and 11. My primary concern is their well-being, and I have dedicated myself to their care and upbringing.Initiating the divorce proceedings
Instituting divorce proceedings against him was the best thing I could have done for myself. He did not take this lightly and immediately defended the divorce proceedings. This was unfortunate, as I believed we could have amicably resolved the divorce. The divorce, in my view, should have been a simple one. Although we were married in a community of property, we did not have many assets. An immovable property involved a house that needed to be sold, and the bond would have to be paid so that we could have shared the sale proceeds. None of us have pension funds, and there is little debt in the joint estate. The only issue was what type of contact my husband would have with the minor children after the divorce.The primary caregiver of the minor children
There was no dispute regarding the minor children remaining in my primary care. At the same time, I do not believe it will benefit the minor children if the father has limited contact with them. Despite our marriage problems, my husband has always been an excellent father to my minor children. They are very fond of him and him of them. Furthermore, I have spoken to the minor children regarding the divorce, and they agree that they would want to remain in my primary care.My husband fighting for shared care of the minor children
After instituting divorce proceedings, my husband decided that he wants to have shared care over the minor children. This never made sense to me. Firstly, although he was always in their lives, he was not their primary caregiver or cared for them like a primary caregiver would. I was the one who attended to them from birth, fed them when they were babies, took them to school, assisted them with their homework, and so on. My husband was always there, playing with them and communicating with them. He would take us as a family out on the weekend to the beach for entertainment, and it was always around. However, should the minor children fall ill, I attended to them. They will come to me first if they require any assistance with schoolwork, homework, extramural activities, etc. Therefore, it would not have benefited the minor children to be in my husband’s care for half the month. At the same time, my husband, due to infidelity, was involved with other people, and therefore, I do not believe it would benefit the minor children to be exposed to his lifestyle and, at the same time, be cared for by him. However, I accept that the minor children would have to meet his new partner as she would form part of their lives. Therefore, I had no problem with him having contact with the minor children every second weekend and half of the school holidays.Presenting my husband with a parenting plan
My attorney at the time presented my husband with a parenting plan. The parenting plan, in my view, was fair. It allowed my husband to have contact with the minor children every day of the week after school for about an hour or two. It also allowed him to have contact with the minor children every second weekend from after school on a Friday until 5 pm on Sunday. He also would have contact with the minor children for half of the long and short school holidays. He would also see the minor children on Father’s Day, Christmas Day, and other special days. On his birthday, he would also have contact with the minor children.My husband refuses to accept my parenting plan
Unfortunately, my husband disagreed with my attorney’s parenting plan and said he would not move away for shared care of the minor children. What this meant was that the minor children would live with me for one week and with him the following week, and this would alternate until the school holidays when we would share the school holidays 50-50. It has never made sense to me because during our marriage, my husband was never available to care for the minor children, and he did not know how to assist with the homework. On top of that, the minor children did not want to be in his primary care during the week.Seeking assistance from experts
To resolve this issue, my attorney enlisted the assistance of a childcare expert. The expert assessed what would be in the minor children’s best interest regarding care and contact after the divorce. The expert recommended that care and contact be as outlined in my attorney’s parenting plan, as outlined above. The minor children would see the father every day of the week, half the school holidays, special days, and every second weekend.Father being unhappy with the expert’s recommendations – Approaching the Office of the Family Advocate
The father of the minor children was still unhappy with the expert recommendation. We then approached the Office of the Family Advocate for assistance office. They conducted an investigation and concluded that it would not be in the minor children’s best interest for the father to have primary care over them or for us to have shared care of them as he proposed.The matter proceeded to Trial
Following the trial in the magistrate’s court, where I presented evidence supporting my position, the judgement was for a shared care regime, a decision I respectfully disagree with. This went against both experts and would not be in the minor children’s best interest.Appealing the divorce court’s decision to the High Court
My attorney then appealed the decision to the High Court. On appeal, the court followed the recommendations of the childcare expert at the office of all the family advocates. The High Court was not convinced that the magistrate made a fair decision, as clearly, based on the facts I presented, the experts said it would not be in the minor children’s best interest for a shared care regime.Assistance with an Appeal to the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal or the Constitutional Court
Should you require assistance with an appeal to the high court, Supreme Court of Appeal, or constitutional court, feel free to contact the firm of Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf.
Posted on by Telelaw