Divorce, child maintenance, child custody, DIY divorce, Cape Town
Related Post
How do I have my case heard in the Constitutional Court of South Africa? I have a case that has constitutional implications.
In South Africa, the Constitutional Court is the highest court in matters related to the interpretation, protection, and enforcement of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court has the authority to hear various types of cases, particularly those involving constitutional matters. Here are some common types of cases that can be appealed to the Constitutional Court:Constitutional Matters:
Cases involving the interpretation, application, or violation of the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa.Human Rights Violations:
Cases involving alleged violations of fundamental human rights guaranteed by the Constitution, such as freedom of expression, equality, and dignity.Legislation Review:
Challenges to the constitutionality of legislation. The Constitutional Court has the authority to review the constitutionality of laws and may declare them invalid if they are found to be inconsistent with the Constitution.Jurisdictional Disputes:
Cases involving disputes about the constitutional powers and functions of different branches of government or between different spheres of government.Electoral Matters:
Cases related to elections, including disputes over the validity of elections and matters concerning the electoral system.Access to Justice:
Cases involving access to justice and fair trial rights, particularly if there are constitutional implications.Land and Property Rights:
Cases related to land and property rights, including disputes over land reform policies and practices.Interpretation of the Bill of Rights:
Cases where the interpretation of specific rights in the Bill of Rights is at issue. It’s important to note that the Constitutional Court has the authority to hear matters referred to it by lower courts, as well as matters that are brought directly to the court. Additionally, the court’s jurisdiction is not exhaustive, and there may be other specific matters that can be appealed based on constitutional grounds. If you are unhappy with a Court decision and require legal assistance regarding a possible appeal to the Constitutional Court, feel free to contact us for assistance.Contact details of the Constitutional Court of South Africa
The contact details of the Constitutional Court of South Africa are as follows as found on https://www.concourt.org.za/index.php/contact-us/superior-courts-contacts: Director of the Constitutional Court:
Tel: +27 11 359-7459
Email: [email protected] Registrar of the Constitutional Court:
Tel: +27 11 359-7400
Email: [email protected] General office: of the Constitutional Court (Court cases):
Tel: +27 11 359-7468 Cell: +27 67 715-3950 (Only for Emergency) Email: [email protected] Library of the Constitutional Court:
Tel: +27 11 359-7400
Email: [email protected]
Posted on by Telelaw
Is it possible for an unmarried father to obtain full custody of a 10-year-old child and not the mother? – A simplified family lawyer’s perspective.
By Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf There is a common misconception that if a child was born out of wedlock; only the mother can be the primary caregiver of the child concerned. This may however generally be the case. However, it is presumed by some that if a mother cared for the child since his or her birth, the father would not be able to be the child’s primary caregiver. In other words, the child would always live with the mother, and never with the father. We do not blame our clients for thinking so. That is the stereotype. As the world changes, so does the law.The popular scenario regarding single parenting?
We are often approached by fathers who have a child that was born out of wedlock. He and the mother most probably lived together when the child was born. But things did not work out between them. The mother moved out and lived with her parents or on her own. The father would then regularly have contact with the child. The type of contact would be decided by the mother. Now the question is, even if the child is 10 years old; is it possible for the child to be cared for by the father and live with him primarily? The answer to that is yes. This is so, as the law looks at what is best for the child concerned.Best interests of the child principles when it comes to children
Both the South African Constitution and the Children’s Act, says that the child’s best interests are given priority. In other words, a child’s best interests are of paramount importance in matters relating to him or her. Therefore, for one to assume at the outset, that only mothers are the best primary caregivers, is not only incorrect but potentially dangerous when dealing in children’s matters. The law expects us to look at all factors, not only who historically looked after the child, but also, the possibility of whether the father can better care for the child. Moreover, as the child’s best interests are of paramount importance, deciding as to whether or not to move a child from the primary care of a mother to that of the father should not be done lightly. Therefore, even if the father, 10 years later, can on the face of it care better for the child than the mother, this should not be the deciding factor. One would also need to look at the emotional and psychological impact it would have on the child as well. 
What would be an ideal situation where moving the child from the mother to the father would be warranted?
In our view, material comforts are not reason enough to move a child from the primary care of a mother to that of a father. If the father is a wealthy person, and the mother not, he can be ordered to pay more child support towards the minor child’s expenses. However, if the child is of a certain age, and he needs to have certain living conditions, and the father has it, then that would be a possible factor in granting the father primary care. For example, if the child is a gifted swimmer, and 17 years old, and in matric, and needs to train consistently, then it makes sense that the father’s living amenities may be an important factor to justify the movement of the child.Obvious reasons to have the child primarily cared for by the father or another party
Then there is the obvious reason to move the child from the primary care of the mother to that of the father or another person. This would be because the mother is totally incapable of caring for the minor child. She may have developed a mental illness, be admitted to a drug rehabilitation facility, or neglects the child whilst in her care. In such a case, one would look at the father. If he too has issues, then the child would need to be placed in alternative care. For example, foster care, or with another relative.Is it possible for an unmarried father to obtain full custody of a 10-year-old child?
From the above, it is clear that it is possible for an unmarried father to obtain full custody of a 10-year-old child. It all depends on the facts of the matter. Whilst mothers may be best to care for the child in his or her early age of development, once should not lose sight of the fact that the father could care better for the child. If he cannot, then the child should remain in the primary care of the mother.
We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws
Posted on by Telelaw