Related Post

Attorneys, Advocates and Trust Account Advocates – Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf

Legal matters can indeed be intricate and often come with hefty financial implications. While courts do not impose fees for adjudicating cases, the legal representation required to navigate these complexities can be costly. It’s not uncommon for legal fees to surpass the monetary claim being pursued in court.

Engaging the Services of Attorneys and Advocate

When engaging the services of both an attorney and an advocate, clients may find themselves incurring even higher expenses. In cases involving complex legal issues, the involvement of an advocate is often essential, but this adds to the financial burden. In recent years, a new category of legal professional has emerged known as Trust Account Advocates. Traditionally, to enlist the services of an advocate, you would first need to engage an attorney who would then instruct the advocate on your behalf. This remains the most common arrangement, but there are notable exceptions in certain circumstances, which is where Trust Account Advocates become particularly beneficial.

What is a Trust Account Advocate?

A Trust Account Advocate functions similarly to a referral advocate but operates under different guidelines. A referral advocate typically only accepts briefs from attorneys, which means the flow of communication and instructions typically goes through the attorney before reaching the advocate. In this model, the advocate bills the attorney for their services, creating an additional layer in the client-advocate relationship. Conversely, a Trust Account Advocate can maintain a trust banking account. This allows clients to deposit funds directly into this account before any legal work begins. Additionally, Trust Account Advocates possess a fidelity fund certificate, ensuring that they are compliant with regulations and protecting clients’ interests. This structure empowers Trust Account Advocates to engage directly with members of the public, bypassing the need for an intermediary attorney, which is a limitation of referral advocates.

Advantages of Using a Trust Account Advocate

Cost Efficiency:

Perhaps the most significant benefit of working with a Trust Account Advocate is the potential to save on legal fees. By eliminating the need for both an advocate and an attorney, clients can reduce their overall legal expenses without sacrificing the quality of representation.

Direct Communication:

Clients working with Trust Account Advocates enjoy the advantage of direct communication. This direct line eliminates the possible delays and miscommunication that can arise when an attorney is the sole point of contact, allowing for more efficient case management and quicker responses.

Expertise in Specialized Areas:

Many Trust Account Advocates specialize in specific legal areas, allowing clients to access expertise tailored to their unique legal challenges. This targeted knowledge can be invaluable in effectively navigating complex legal matters.

Simplified Process:

Engaging directly with a Trust Account Advocate can streamline the legal process. This arrangement often leads to reduced administrative burdens and faster initiation of legal work, enabling clients to address their legal issues promptly.

Transparency in Billing:

With a Trust Account Advocate, clients typically have clearer visibility into fees and billing practices since payments are made directly to the advocate. This transparency can help avoid surprises down the line and foster trust between clients and their legal representatives. In conclusion, the rise of Trust Account Advocates offers a refreshing alternative in the legal landscape, providing clients with more options for representation while potentially saving on costs and enhancing the overall experience. By utilizing their services, clients can take advantage of direct access to legal expertise, fostering a more engaged and efficient legal process.

Posted on by Telelaw

Parenting Plans and the Law – Draft and Register you Plan

Sections 33 and 34 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 (the Act) came into operation on 1 April 2010. These sections make provision for “parenting plans”. Like many parents, legal practitioners, social workers, psychologists, social services professional and other suitably qualified persons would be faced with the task of acting in accordance with sections 33 and 34 of the Act; this guide attempts to facilitate a quick understanding.

What is a parenting plan?

The Act does not provide a definition of a parenting plan. However, looking at the provisions of the Act and its Regulations dealing with parenting plans, one could define it as a written agreement between co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights outlining in detail their respective responsibilities and rights of care, contact, guardianship and maintenance with regard to a child. Below I shall outline the relevant provisions of the Act and its Regulations dealing with parenting plans and how they should be applied in practice.

Who should agree on a parenting plan?

Not all holders of parental responsibilities and rights need to agree on a parenting plan and have it registered with a Family Advocate or made an Order of the High Court. Parenting Plans should be entered into only if there is a need for it. However, the choice is always there for the parties should they wish to formalise one. Section 33 of the Act provides for two (2) situations in which a parenting plan comes into play. This I shall refer to as the optional situation and the mandatory situation.

Optional situation – section 33(1)

Section 33(1) of the Act states the following:
“(1) The co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child may agree on a parenting plan determining the exercise of their respective responsibilities and rights in respect of the child.”
  This situation would apply when the parties want to have a structured parenting plan in place but none of them intends to go to Court on any issue. You could say they are not experiencing difficulties in exercising their responsibilities and rights but wants to have a formalised structure on paper. This optional situation may apply where the parents of the child do not live together and there is no document in place regulating their respective care and contact responsibilities and rights to the child.

Mandatory situation – section 33(2)

The other situation where a parenting plan comes into play is where the parties are experiencing difficulties in exercising their responsibilities and rights. In this case, the Act prescribes to them to first try to agree on a parenting plan before going to Court. Section 33(2) states:
“If the co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child are experiencing difficulties in exercising their responsibilities and rights, those persons, before seeking the intervention of a court, must first seek to agree on a parenting plan determining the exercise of their respective responsibilities and rights in respect of the child.”
Therefore, all holders of parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child do not need to enter into a parenting plan from the outset as stated. However, should there be problems and one or more of the parties may want to take it to Court, before they do so, they should first try to agree on a parenting plan before approaching the Court. Should the parties fail to agree on a parenting plan after following the prescripts of the Act, the Court may then be approached. As outlined later, once the parenting plan has been agreed upon by the relevant parties, it may either be registered with a Family Advocate or made an Order of Court.  

What must the parenting plan deal with according to the Act?

The contents of both optional and mandatory parenting plans can vary, however, according to section 33(3) of the Act:  
“A parenting plan may determine any matter in connection with parental responsibilities and rights, including- (a) where and with whom the child is to live; (b) the maintenance of the child; (c) contact between the child and- (i) any of the parties; and (ii) any other person; and (d) the schooling and religious upbringing of the child.”  
  Furthermore, the Regulations to the Act prescribes child participation bearing in mind the child’s age, maturity, and stage of development. Regulation 11 which deals with the participation of a child in preparation of parenting plans states the following:
(1)  Bearing in mind the child’s age, maturity and stage of development, such child must be consulted during the development of a parenting plan, and granted an opportunity to express his or her views, which must be accorded due consideration. (2) When a parenting plan has been agreed the child must, bearing in mind the child’s age, maturity and stage of development, be informed of the contents of the parenting plan by the family advocate, a social worker, social service   professional, psychologist, suitably qualified person or the child’s legal representative.
Therefore, before an optional or mandatory parenting plan can be registered with a Family Advocate or made an Order of Court, Regulation 11 must be applied. Section 34 of the Children’s Act deals with the formalities of a parenting plan that need to be adhered to before it can be registered with a Family Advocate or made an Order of Court. It states the following:
“(1) A parenting plan- (a) must be in writing and signed by the parties to the agreement; and (b) subject to subsection (2), may be registered with a family advocate or made an order of court. (2) An application by co-holders contemplated in section 33 (1) for the registration of the parenting plan or for it to be made an order of court must- (a) be in the prescribed format and contain the prescribed particulars; and (b) be accompanied by a copy of the plan. (3) An application by co-holders contemplated in section 33 (2) for the registration of a parenting plan or for it to be made an order of court must- (a) be in the prescribed format and contain the prescribed particulars; and (b) be accompanied by- (i) a copy of the plan; and (ii) a statement by- (aa) a family advocate, social worker or psychologist contemplated in section 33 (5) (a) to the effect that the plan was prepared after consultation with such a family advocate, social worker or psychologist; or (bb) a social worker or other appropriate person contemplated in section 33 (5) (b) to the effect that the plan was prepared after mediation by such social worker or such person. (4) A parenting plan registered with a family advocate may be amended or terminated by the family advocate on application by the co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights who are parties to the plan. (5) A parenting plan that was made an order of court may be amended or terminated only by an order of court on application- (a) by the co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights who are parties to the plan; (b) by the child, acting with leave of the court; or (c) in the child’s interest, by any other person acting with leave of the court.”  
  Once the parties decide to proceed to try to agree on a parenting plan, they need to have the parenting plan prepared. If section 33(2) applies, they would need to do it with the assistance of the relevant party. However, for both optional and mandatory parenting plans, the best interests of the child principle apply. According to section 33(4) of the Act:  
“A parenting plan must comply with the best interests of the child standard as set out in section 7”.
  Now we look at the Act and Regulations that come into play in preparing a parenting plan.  

Optional parenting Plan – sec 33(1)

With regard to an optional parenting plan (sec. 33(1)), the parties may attend to preparing the parenting plan without the assistance of the Family Advocate, Social Worker or psychologist but they need to make sure it complies with this Act. It is however suggested that they approach a legal practitioner to assist them in this regard. As outlined later, once the parenting plan has been agreed upon and signed, it needs to be attached to Form 8. With regard to mandatory parenting plans, other parties get involved to either assist in preparing the parenting plan or for mediation.

Mandatory parenting plan – section 33(2)

According to section 33 (5) of the Act:
“In preparing a parenting plan as contemplated in subsection (2) the parties must seek- (a) the assistance of a family advocate, social worker or psychologist; or (b) mediation through a social worker or other suitably qualified person.”
  Regulation 9 to Act deals with the registration of parenting plans and having them made Orders of Court. It states:
(1) An application for the registration of a parenting plan at the office of the family advocate or for it to be made an order of court must be completed in writing in a form identical to Form 8 and must- (a) be signed by the parties to the parenting plan or, if a person whose signature is required is incapable of furnishing a signature, a thumbprint of that person must be effected and duly attested by a commissioner of oaths; (b) contain the titles, full names, dates of birth, identity numbers or passport numbers (as the case may be), residential, work addresses, and contact details of all co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights named in the parenting plan; and (c) contain the full names, dates of birth, identity numbers or passport numbers (as the case may be), residential addresses and contact details of any child or children named in the parenting plan. (2) Where parental responsibilities and rights are to be exercised in the same manner by the holders of those responsibilities and rights with respect to more than one child in the same family, the application for registration of the parenting plan must be completed for each child. (3) The applicant or applicants for the registration of a parenting plan must file copies of such plan with the family advocate, children’s court or High Court, as the case may be, to enable each co-holder to retain a copy of the registered parenting plan.  
Therefore, once the parenting plan complies with the Act and its Regulations, Form 8 needs to be completed for both optional and mandatory parenting plans. However, there is a further instruction in terms of the Regulations regarding mandatory parenting plans. The Regulations to the Act further instructs on what other form needs to be completed should a mandatory parenting plan (sec. 33(2)) be registered with a Family Advocate or made an Order of Court. Regulation 10 states the following:
  (1) The co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights as contemplated in section 30 and who are experiencing difficulty in exercising their responsibilities and rights as envisaged in section 33(2) of the Act must seek to agree on a parenting plan on matters referred to in section 33(3) of the Act. (2) The parenting plan contemplated in sub-regulation (1) must be prepared: (a) with the assistance of a family advocate, social worker or psychologist as contemplated in section 33(5)(a) of the Act, and must be completed in writing in a form identical to Form 9; or (b) after mediation by a social worker or other suitably qualified person as contemplated in section 33(5)(b) of the Act, and must be completed in writing in a form identical to Form 10.  
  It would seem that the relevant form(s) and parenting plan should be left with the Office of the Family Advocate or the Registrar of the High Court to have the parental plan registered or made an Order of Court as the case may be. It does however not seem that Rule 6 of the Uniform Rules of the High Court are applicable. However, it would seem prudent, failing directives to the contrary to make the Application in terms of Rule 6 and attach the relevant documents referred to herein with a supporting affidavit(s) and file same with the Office of the Family Advocate. Once the parenting plan is registered with a Family Advocate or made an Order of Court, the parties would be expected to adhere to the parenting plan.   Court proceedings for optional parenting plans Interesting to note is section 34 (6) of the Act where it states:
“Section 29 applies to an application in terms of subsection (2).”
Section 34 subsection (2) refers to the registration of parenting plans with a Family Advocate and for it to be made an Order of Court which was dealt with above.   Section 29 of the Act deals with various applications in the High Court, a divorce court in a divorce matter or a Children’s Court as the case may be. Looking at Section 29, the Court is not obliged to make any parenting plan an Order of Court and may only grant an application if it’s in the best interests of the child.   Section 29 (5) states the following:
The court may for the purposes of the hearing order that – a report and recommendations of the family advocate, a social worker or other suitably qualified person must be submitted to the court; a matter specified by the court must be investigated by a person designated by the court; a person specified by the court must appear before it to give or produce evidence; or the applicant or any party opposing the application must pay the costs of any such investigation or appearance.
Therefore, the Court would not blindly make a parental plan an Order of Court, but would first need to be convinced that it is in the child’s best interests. It is submitted that before a Court makes a mandatory parental plan (sec. 33(2)) an Order of Court, notwithstanding it being prepared or mediated with the assistance of the relevant person, the Court would still need to be satisfied that the parenting plan is in the minor child’s best interests before making the parenting plan an Order of Court. If the Court is not so satisfied, it may make an order similar to those provided for in section 29(5) referred to above.   Contempt of Court   The question which may be posed is what is better, having the parenting plan registered with the Family Advocate or made an Order of Court? In my view, it would be better to make it an Order of Court as this would force all parties to comply with it or they would be in contempt of Court. Furthermore, section 35 of the Act states amongst other things that it is a criminal offence to refuse or prevents a co-holder of parental responsibilities of rights to exercise such responsibilities and rights and may be liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period of not exceeding one year.

Sharing is Caring

This and other articles and posts found on this website are written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf to assist people with various family law related issues they may have. If you find any of our articles, free resources and posts interesting, or possibly useful to others, please like and share it on Social Media by clicking on the icons below. For more interesting articles and information on Family Law, view our articles and Q&A page. If you have a family law related legal issue and you want someone to answer or reply to it, feel free to post it on our Family Law Blog. Therefore, kindly like and share. Should you require any other legal services and advice, not related to family law, visit Private Legal.

Posted on by Telelaw

Finding the right lawyer (Attorney or Advocate) to fight for you in your contractual dispute in Durban. Read further below about a “Bulldog Lawyer”)

Contract law is the bedrock of business and day-to-day transactions, providing a framework for parties to define their rights, obligations, and expectations. However, disputes can arise when one or more parties feel that the terms of the contract have been violated. This can apply to an employment contract, lease agreement, marriage contract, or one where you lent someone money. Even buying groceries at your local grocery is a contractual transaction. You pay, and he provides you with the goods. The list is endless.

All is good until someone violates the terms of the contract. This is where you may want to use an attorney or advocate in Durban. Read further below about what is referred to as a “bulldog lawyer”. If the other side is playing hardball or has a bulldog lawyer, then having a tough lawyer who takes no-nonsense is something that you must consider. Please note that the law on contractual disputes would be the same whether you live in Durban or any other city in South Africa.

Let us get into the theory. Navigating the complexities of contract law disputes requires a clear understanding of the legal principles and practical strategies for resolution.

Critical Elements of Contract Law are as follows:

Formation of Contract:

Before delving into disputes, it’s essential to understand how contracts are formed. A valid contract typically requires an offer, acceptance, consideration, legal capacity, and legality of purpose. Disputes may arise if any of these elements are in question. If you are entering into a high value contact, it may be best to consult with an advocate or attorney beforehand.

Types of Contracts:

Contracts can take various forms, such as express, implied, unilateral, and bilateral. Understanding the nature of the contract is crucial in determining the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

Common Contract Disputes:

Breach of Contract:

The most prevalent type of contract dispute arises from a breach. This occurs when one party fails to fulfil its obligations outlined in the contract. It could involve non-payment, incomplete performance, or failure to deliver goods or services.

Misrepresentation:

If one party makes false statements that induce another to enter a contract, it may lead to a dispute. Misrepresentation can be innocent, negligent, or fraudulent, each carrying different legal consequences.

Duress and Undue Influence:

Contracts entered under duress or undue influence may be deemed voidable. If one party was coerced or pressured into an agreement, it could lead to a dispute over the contract’s validity.

What follows are resolution strategies when it comes to contract disputes.

Negotiation:

Often, disputes can be resolved through negotiation. Parties can discuss the issues, explore compromises, and reach a mutually acceptable resolution without legal action. You should use a tough lawyer to represent you if the other side is unreasonable.

Mediation:

Mediation involves a neutral third-party facilitating discussions between the parties to help them resolve. It is a voluntary and confidential process that can be less adversarial than litigation.

Arbitration:

Arbitration is a more formal process where an arbitrator or a panel makes a binding decision after hearing both sides. It provides a faster and more private resolution compared to traditional court proceedings.

Litigation:

If all else fails, parties may resort to litigation. This involves taking the dispute to court, presenting evidence, and having a judge decide. Litigation can be time-consuming and costly, but it provides a definitive resolution.

Conclusion:

Contract law disputes are an inherent risk in business transactions, but understanding the principles and available resolution strategies can mitigate potential damage. Whether through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation, the goal is to find a fair and just resolution that upholds the integrity of the contractual relationship. As businesses continue to engage in complex transactions, a comprehensive understanding of contract law and dispute resolution mechanisms is essential for navigating the legal landscape successfully. When meeting with an advocate or attorney to assist you in your contractual dispute, discuss the above issues or factors with him or her to find out if they know what they are talking about.

What is a bulldog lawyer?

A “bulldog lawyer” is a colloquial term used to describe a lawyer (attorney or advocate) known for their aggressive and tenacious approach to legal representation. The term draws an analogy between the lawyer’s characteristics and those of a bulldog, known for its solid and determined demeanour. Bulldog lawyers are often associated with being assertive, persistent, and unwavering in pursuing their client’s interests.

Key characteristics of a bulldog lawyer may include:

Aggressiveness: Bulldog lawyers are known for their assertive and forceful advocacy on behalf of their clients. They are unafraid to challenge opponents and vigorously pursue their client’s objectives.

Tenacity:

Bulldog lawyers are persistent and determined in their legal pursuits. They may be willing to go to great lengths to achieve their client’s goals and are known for not easily giving up in the face of challenges.

Fearlessness:

Bulldog lawyers are often unafraid to take on tough cases or confront powerful adversaries. They may be known for their willingness to face complex legal battles head-on.

Advocacy Skills: Bulldog lawyers possess strong advocacy skills, including effective communication, negotiation, and litigation abilities. They can passionately argue their client’s case in court or during negotiations.

Strategic Thinking:

While aggressive, bulldog lawyers are also strategic in their approach. They carefully plan their legal strategies and tactics to achieve the best possible outcome for their clients.

It’s important to note that “bulldog lawyer” can have positive and negative connotations. On the positive side, it highlights an attorney’s dedication and commitment to their clients. On the negative side, it may suggest an overly aggressive or abrasive style that may not be suitable for all legal matters or personalities.

 

 

Posted on by Telelaw

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!