I am concerned about my niece’s wellbeing. Is it possible for me to obtain rights of custody and guardianship over her? The parents are still alive but divorced.

We often receive enquiries from family members of minor children wanting to know whether they can obtain rights of custody or guardianship over a minor child. The client could be a grandmother, an aunt, or in some instances, a former step-parent. Let us take you through a scenario where an aunt wishes to obtain sole custody and guardianship over a minor child. Should you be an interested party wishing to obtain parental responsibilities and rights over a minor child; feel free to contact us for a legal advice consultation.

The scenario: The minor child is being primarily cared for by the paternal aunt

The parents of a minor child, age 16, are married and living together. The minor child, who is in grade 10, frequents the home of her paternal aunt. The parents live very busy lives, and often have to travel overseas on separate business trips for extended periods. The minor child sometimes doesn’t see her parents for weeks on end. Nonetheless, she is well cared for by her aunt, during the week, and on most weekends, and whilst her parents are away on business. Basically, you can say the aunt is her primary caregiver, since birth. The aunt has her own family, however, her husband passed away before the minor child was born. She has two adult children of her own living with her. They are both at university. The minor child is very fond of them and sees them as her older siblings. She even tells her friends they are her siblings. The aunt collects the minor child from school, takes her to her extramural activities and assists her with her homework every day. She even used to bathe her at her home and makes sure she has supper before one of her parents or the driver collects her the evening. A few weeks ago, the parents separated and the father moved to a different province due to work. The mother on the other hand, who has no time for the minor child, wants her to attend boarding school. This is a different school. Her current school is close to where the aunt resides. The mother now does not want the minor child to have any contact with the aunt or any of her husband’s family. Now let us see what the law has to say about this scenario.

Do aunts and uncles have parental rights and responsibilities over their nieces and nephews?

If you are not the biological parents of a minor child, you do not have parental responsibilities and rights over him or her. In other words, you do not have a right to have contact with the minor child. If the parents do not want the aunt or uncle to visit the child; then they have to adhere to it. The same applies to decisions regarding the minor child. It is the parents who must make decisions on the minor child’s behalf. In the scenario above, the aunt can’t demand that she wants the minor child to visit her every day as she did in the past. She is welcome to ask, but if the parents refuse, that would be it. Now let us look at the law that could assist the aunt.

Does the law assist interested parties in obtaining parental responsibilities and rights?

Obviously, it won’t be in the minor child’s best interests if she is placed in a boarding school and no longer have contact with the aunt and her cousins. Luckily, the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 comes to her assistance. It makes it possible for the assignment of contact and care to interested persons by order of the court. Furthermore, the Children’s Act makes it possible for a person having an interest in the care, well-being and development of a child to apply to the High Court for an order granting guardianship of the child to the applicant. In this case, it would be the aunt referred to above. Have a look at the relevant sections of the Children’s Act next. You may skip the reading of the relevant section of the Children’s Act and read on further below.

23     Assignment of contact and care to interested person by order of court

23 Assignment of contact and care to interested person by order of court (1) Any person having an interest in the care, well-being or development of a child may apply to the High Court, a divorce court in divorce matters or the children’s court for an order granting to the applicant, on such conditions as the court may deem necessary- (a) contact with the child; or (b) care of the child. (2) When considering an application contemplated in subsection (1), the court must take into account- (a) the best interests of the child; (b) the relationship between the applicant and the child, and any other relevant person and the child; (c) the degree of commitment that the applicant has shown towards the child; (d) the extent to which the applicant has contributed towards expenses in connection with the birth and maintenance of the child; and (e) any other fact that should, in the opinion of the court, be taken into account. (3) If in the course of the court proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that an application for the adoption of the child has been made by another applicant, the court- (a) must request a family advocate, social worker or psychologist to furnish it with a report and recommendations as to what is in the best interests of the child; and (b) may suspend the first-mentioned application on any conditions it may determine. (4) The granting of care or contact to a person in terms of this section does not affect the parental responsibilities and rights that any other person may have in respect of the same child.  

24 Assignment of guardianship by order of court

(1) Any person having an interest in the care, well-being and development of a child may apply to the High Court for an order granting guardianship of the child to the applicant. (2) When considering an application contemplated in subsection (1), the court must take into account- (a) the best interests of the child; (b) the relationship between the applicant and the child, and any other relevant person and the child; and (c) any other fact that should, in the opinion of the court, be taken into account. (3) In the event of a person applying for guardianship of a child that already has a guardian, the applicant must submit reasons as to why the child’s existing guardian is not suitable to have guardianship in respect of the child.  

How does the law assist the aunt in the scenario above?

We would advise the aunt to make use of section 23 of the Children’s Act for the assignment of contact and care rights to her. The Application would be made to the relevant court. If she is successful, she will then still be able to have the minor child at her home after school and assist her. As the minor child is almost an adult, and her mother is around, we do not think it is necessary for her to be assigned rights of guardianship over the minor child.   We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws  

I am concerned about my niece’s wellbeing. Is it possible for me to obtain rights of custody and guardianship over her? The parents are still alive but divorced.

We often receive enquiries from family members of minor children wanting to know whether they can obtain rights of custody or guardianship over a minor child. The client could be a grandmother, an aunt, or in some instances, a former step-parent. Let us take you through a scenario where an aunt wishes to obtain sole custody and guardianship over a minor child. Should you be an interested party wishing to obtain parental responsibilities and rights over a minor child; feel free to contact us for a legal advice consultation.

The scenario: The minor child is being primarily cared for by the paternal aunt

The parents of a minor child, age 16, are married and living together. The minor child, who is in grade 10, frequents the home of her paternal aunt. The parents live very busy lives, and often have to travel overseas on separate business trips for extended periods. The minor child sometimes doesn’t see her parents for weeks on end. Nonetheless, she is well cared for by her aunt, during the week, and on most weekends, and whilst her parents are away on business. Basically, you can say the aunt is her primary caregiver, since birth.

The aunt has her own family, however, her husband passed away before the minor child was born. She has two adult children of her own living with her. They are both at university. The minor child is very fond of them and sees them as her older siblings. She even tells her friends they are her siblings.

The aunt collects the minor child from school, takes her to her extramural activities and assists her with her homework every day. She even used to bathe her at her home and makes sure she has supper before one of her parents or the driver collects her the evening.

A few weeks ago, the parents separated and the father moved to a different province due to work. The mother on the other hand, who has no time for the minor child, wants her to attend boarding school. This is a different school. Her current school is close to where the aunt resides. The mother now does not want the minor child to have any contact with the aunt or any of her husband’s family. Now let us see what the law has to say about this scenario.

Do aunts and uncles have parental rights and responsibilities over their nieces and nephews?

If you are not the biological parents of a minor child, you do not have parental responsibilities and rights over him or her. In other words, you do not have a right to have contact with the minor child. If the parents do not want the aunt or uncle to visit the child; then they have to adhere to it. The same applies to decisions regarding the minor child. It is the parents who must make decisions on the minor child’s behalf. In the scenario above, the aunt can’t demand that she wants the minor child to visit her every day as she did in the past. She is welcome to ask, but if the parents refuse, that would be it. Now let us look at the law that could assist the aunt.

Does the law assist interested parties in obtaining parental responsibilities and rights?

Obviously, it won’t be in the minor child’s best interests if she is placed in a boarding school and no longer have contact with the aunt and her cousins. Luckily, the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 comes to her assistance. It makes it possible for the assignment of contact and care to interested persons by order of the court. Furthermore, the Children’s Act makes it possible for a person having an interest in the care, well-being and development of a child to apply to the High Court for an order granting guardianship of the child to the applicant. In this case, it would be the aunt referred to above. Have a look at the relevant sections of the Children’s Act next. You may skip the reading of the relevant section of the Children’s Act and read on further below.

23     Assignment of contact and care to interested person by order of court

23 Assignment of contact and care to interested person by order of court (1) Any person having an interest in the care, well-being or development of a child may apply to the High Court, a divorce court in divorce matters or the children’s court for an order granting to the applicant, on such conditions as the court may deem necessary-

(a) contact with the child; or

(b) care of the child. (2) When considering an application contemplated in subsection (1), the court must take into account-

(a) the best interests of the child;

(b) the relationship between the applicant and the child, and any other relevant person and the child;

(c) the degree of commitment that the applicant has shown towards the child;

(d) the extent to which the applicant has contributed towards expenses in connection with the birth and maintenance of the child; and

(e) any other fact that should, in the opinion of the court, be taken into account.

(3) If in the course of the court proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that an application for the adoption of the child has been made by another applicant, the court-

(a) must request a family advocate, social worker or psychologist to furnish it with a report and recommendations as to what is in the best interests of the child; and

(b) may suspend the first-mentioned application on any conditions it may determine.

(4) The granting of care or contact to a person in terms of this section does not affect the parental responsibilities and rights that any other person may have in respect of the same child.

 

24 Assignment of guardianship by order of court

(1) Any person having an interest in the care, well-being and development of a child may apply to the High Court for an order granting guardianship of the child to the applicant.

(2) When considering an application contemplated in subsection (1), the court must take into account-

(a) the best interests of the child;

(b) the relationship between the applicant and the child, and any other relevant person and the child; and

(c) any other fact that should, in the opinion of the court, be taken into account.

(3) In the event of a person applying for guardianship of a child that already has a guardian, the applicant must submit reasons as to why the child’s existing guardian is not suitable to have guardianship in respect of the child.

 

How does the law assist the aunt in the scenario above?

We would advise the aunt to make use of section 23 of the Children’s Act for the assignment of contact and care rights to her. The Application would be made to the relevant court. If she is successful, she will then still be able to have the minor child at her home after school and assist her. As the minor child is almost an adult, and her mother is around, we do not think it is necessary for her to be assigned rights of guardianship over the minor child.

 

We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well.

Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links:

Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws

 

Related Post

I am in search of a trustworthy attorney or advocate. Please direct me to reputable sources to find one.

There are many reputable sources for legal advice and services. Some options include consulting with an advocate or attorney, reaching out to a legal aid organisation, or searching for legal resources through your various websites. It’s essential to research and choose a reliable source to ensure that you receive accurate and trustworthy legal guidance, advice or representation.

When do I decide that there is a need to consult with a lawyer, attorney, or advocate?

Consider consulting with a lawyer, attorney, or advocate if you are facing a legal issue or have questions you need help with. Some everyday situations where you may want to consult a lawyer include:  1. You have been arrested or charged with a crime;  2. You are facing a civil lawsuit or have been served with legal papers.  3. You are considering filing for divorce or dealing with a child custody issue.  4. You are starting a business or need help with business contracts.  5. You are buying or selling a home or other real estate property.  6. You are facing an employment dispute or have questions about your rights as an employee.  A lawyer can provide guidance and support throughout the legal process, ensure that your rights are protected, and help you achieve the best possible outcome in your case. I think it’s essential to choose a lawyer with experience in law that pertains to your specific issue and who you feel comfortable working with.

Is it better to consult with an attorney or advocate virtually or in person?

Whether it is better to consult with a lawyer virtually or in person depends on your preferences and the nature of your legal issue.  Virtual consultations, such as video or phone consultations, can be a convenient option for individuals who cannot travel to a lawyer’s office or prefer the flexibility of consulting with a lawyer from the comfort of their home. Virtual consultations can also benefit individuals with time constraints or who need to consult with a lawyer quickly. However, in-person consultations may be preferable for individuals who prefer face-to-face interaction and feel more comfortable discussing sensitive legal issues. In-person consultations can also allow for a more thorough and detailed discussion of your legal issue and the opportunity to review and sign legal documents on the spot. Ultimately, the decision to consult with a lawyer, attorney or advocate virtually or in person is a personal one and depends on your individual needs and preferences. Many lawyers offer virtual and in-person consultations, so it’s important to discuss your options with your lawyer and choose the best option.

What is free legal advice by an attorney or advocate?

Free legal advice refers to providing legal guidance or information without charge or cost to the recipient. This may be provided by legal aid organisations, pro bono attorneys or advocates, or other resources that offer free legal services. Free legal advice can be helpful for individuals who are unable to afford the cost of hiring an attorney or advocate. Still, ensuring that the advice received is accurate and reliable is essential. Free legal advice may only sometimes be able to address complex legal issues or provide ongoing legal representation fully.

Are all advocates and attorneys the same?

No, not all lawyers are the same. While the High Court has admitted all advocates and attorneys, they may specialise in different areas of law and have varying levels of experience and expertise. Some lawyers may focus on criminal law, while others specialise in family law, intellectual property law, or other areas. Additionally, lawyers may work in private practice, government agencies, or non-profit organisations, impacting their practice and areas of expertise. I think choosing a lawyer with experience in law is essential.

Is there a guarantee that I will win my court case with a lawyer?

No, there is no guarantee that you will win your court case. The outcome of a court case depends on various factors, including the strength of the evidence, the arguments presented by each side, the judge’s interpretation of the law, and other factors. While a lawyer can provide guidance and help prepare your case, they cannot guarantee a specific outcome. It’s essential to have realistic expectations, be prepared for the possibility of an unfavourable outcome, and plan how to proceed if this occurs.

How often should I consult with my attorney or advocate?

The frequency with which you should consult with your lawyer depends on the nature of your legal issue and the complexity of your case. In some cases, you may only need to consult with your lawyer once or twice throughout the entire legal process, while in other cases, you may need to communicate with them more frequently. It’s essential to set clear expectations with your lawyer regarding communication and ensure you are both on the same page regarding how often you will check in and what type of updates you can expect. Also, please feel free to ask me any questions or concerns during the legal process. In that case, reaching out to your lawyer as soon as possible would be essential to ensure they can address them effectively.

What do I do if I am not happy with the outcome of the court case?

If you are not happy with the outcome of your court case, several options may be available to you, depending on the circumstances of your case.  Firstly, you may have the option to file an appeal, which is a formal request for a higher court to review the decision made in your case. You would appeal to the High Court if your matter were heard in the Magistrates  Court. An appeal can only be filed if there were errors in the legal process that may have affected the outcome of your case, such as the application of the wrong law, facts, procedural errors and so on. Additionally, suppose that your lawyer provided inadequate representation or made significant errors that may have impacted the outcome of your case. In that case, you may have the option to file a complaint or a malpractice claim against them.  I think consulting with a lawyer is essential to determine the best course of action in your specific case. They can guide your legal options and help you make an informed decision about how to proceed.

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!