The role of antenuptial contracts in South Africa – What do you need to know before getting married?

When people are in love, they often want to spend the rest of their lives together. And one way of doing so is to get married. Usually, after they got married, they will start a family. However, there is one important aspect many people do not consider before getting married. And that is the propriety regime that would apply to their marriage. In other words, what belongs to who during the marriage and after the marriage should they divorce or one spouse passes away.

Marriages in community of property – The Standard Regime

In South Africa, the default matrimonial property regime is that of in community of property and profit and loss.  What this means, is that whatever property the couple have during the marriage, they would share. This includes debt. Therefore, should a party receive a huge sum of money during the marriage, that money would belong to both the parties and form part of the joint estate. The same principle would apply should a party get into financial trouble. In such a case both the spouses or the joint estate would be responsible for that debt. If spouses are happy to share in each other’s wealth and liabilities during the marriage, then being married in community of property may be a good option. However, if this matrimonial property regime does not appeal to a couple before they get married, then a different matrimonial property regime should be looked at. Now let us move on to a marriage out of community of property.

Marriages out of community of property – with or without the accrual regime

Marriages out of community of property may take two faces. The first is out of community of property without the inclusion of the accrual regime. This is its purest form. The other would be a marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime. Before we explain the differences between the two, we need to explain to you what it is meant to be married out of community of property and profit and loss.

Marriage out of community of property

Being married out of community of property means that spouses during the marriage own their own assets and are solely responsible for any debt owed by either of them. This can be compared to a marriage in community of property where the opposite applies. Therefore, if the couple is married out of community of property, a spouse would not require the other spouse’s consent to incur a debt. A spouse would not be entitled to claim any monies belonging to the other spouse by virtue of being married. In short, if you are married out of community of property, you are solely responsible for your estate. As would be seen further below, to be married out of community of property you have to enter into an antenuptial contract.

What is the accrual regime?

As mentioned above, a marriage out of community of property could have the accrual regime apply to it or not. The aspect of accrual only comes into play should the parties divorce or one of them pass away. The parties would then share in half the difference between the two estates. This amount is referred to as the accrual. Therefore, by way of example, should one spouse pass away and the estate of the deceased has grown in the sum of R10 000 – 00, then the surviving spouse should receive half of that. The above example would apply if the surviving spouse’s estate has not grown at all. If it has grown, then they would share in half the difference of their respective growths.

Marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime

The accrual regime automatically applies to a marriage out of community of property, unless it is expressly excluded in an antenuptial contract. During the marriage, the same principles as above apply to a marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime.

Marriage out of community of property with the exclusion of the accrual regime

If the couple does not want the accrual regime to apply to their marriage out of community of property, they need to expressly stipulate it in the antenuptial contract. If they do not do so, then their marriage would automatically be out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime.

Parties entering into an antenuptial contract before the marriage

As stated, if a couple wants to get married out of community of property with or without the inclusion of the accrual regime, they need to enter into an antenuptial contract. They would sign a document wherein they stipulate what matrimonial property regime would apply to the marriage. Other matters may be included in an antenuptial contract. For example, assets that should not be included in the calculation of the accrual. The antenuptial contract is signed before a notary public and it is registered at the Deeds Office. In that way, the public would know that you are married out of community of property.

What happens if I did not enter into an antenuptial contract and want to change it later?

Should a couple get married and later decide to change the matrimonial property regime, they may do so with the consent of the High Court. A court application would have to be made to the High Court explaining to the court why they wish to change the matrimonial property regime and also which property regime they now wish to apply to them.

Publication of Application to change the matrimonial property regime

Various other information would be included in the High Court Application which could entail details of various creditors of the spouses and their assets and liabilities and so on. Attached to the court documents would also be a draft postnuptial contract. The Application and the Court date would be published in the Government Gazette and one or two local newspapers for potential creditors to be informed about the pending Court Application.

Informing creditors of the change in the matrimonial property regime

Various creditors would also be notified of the application via registered mail. The application can be expensive because of the work and expenses involved. This cost includes attorney fees advocate fees, publication fees etc. It is therefore important to decide before the marriage whether or not the matrimonial property regime of community of property is the best regime for you before getting married. If it is not the best for you and your intended spouse, we advised that the enter into an antenuptial contract. This will not only save you money in the long run but also avoid a lot of complications in the future. Speak to us should you wish to enter into an antenuptial contract. Our antenuptial contract product may be purchased here.   We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws    

The role of antenuptial contracts in South Africa – What do you need to know before getting married?

When people are in love, they often want to spend the rest of their lives together. And one way of doing so is to get married. Usually, after they got married, they will start a family. However, there is one important aspect many people do not consider before getting married. And that is the propriety regime that would apply to their marriage. In other words, what belongs to who during the marriage and after the marriage should they divorce or one spouse passes away.

Marriages in community of property – The Standard Regime

In South Africa, the default matrimonial property regime is that of in community of property and profit and loss.  What this means, is that whatever property the couple have during the marriage, they would share. This includes debt. Therefore, should a party receive a huge sum of money during the marriage, that money would belong to both the parties and form part of the joint estate. The same principle would apply should a party get into financial trouble. In such a case both the spouses or the joint estate would be responsible for that debt.

If spouses are happy to share in each other’s wealth and liabilities during the marriage, then being married in community of property may be a good option. However, if this matrimonial property regime does not appeal to a couple before they get married, then a different matrimonial property regime should be looked at. Now let us move on to a marriage out of community of property.

Marriages out of community of property – with or without the accrual regime

Marriages out of community of property may take two faces. The first is out of community of property without the inclusion of the accrual regime. This is its purest form. The other would be a marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime. Before we explain the differences between the two, we need to explain to you what it is meant to be married out of community of property and profit and loss.

Marriage out of community of property

Being married out of community of property means that spouses during the marriage own their own assets and are solely responsible for any debt owed by either of them. This can be compared to a marriage in community of property where the opposite applies. Therefore, if the couple is married out of community of property, a spouse would not require the other spouse’s consent to incur a debt. A spouse would not be entitled to claim any monies belonging to the other spouse by virtue of being married. In short, if you are married out of community of property, you are solely responsible for your estate. As would be seen further below, to be married out of community of property you have to enter into an antenuptial contract.

What is the accrual regime?

As mentioned above, a marriage out of community of property could have the accrual regime apply to it or not. The aspect of accrual only comes into play should the parties divorce or one of them pass away. The parties would then share in half the difference between the two estates. This amount is referred to as the accrual. Therefore, by way of example, should one spouse pass away and the estate of the deceased has grown in the sum of R10 000 – 00, then the surviving spouse should receive half of that. The above example would apply if the surviving spouse’s estate has not grown at all. If it has grown, then they would share in half the difference of their respective growths.

Marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime

The accrual regime automatically applies to a marriage out of community of property, unless it is expressly excluded in an antenuptial contract. During the marriage, the same principles as above apply to a marriage out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime.

Marriage out of community of property with the exclusion of the accrual regime

If the couple does not want the accrual regime to apply to their marriage out of community of property, they need to expressly stipulate it in the antenuptial contract. If they do not do so, then their marriage would automatically be out of community of property with the inclusion of the accrual regime.

Parties entering into an antenuptial contract before the marriage

As stated, if a couple wants to get married out of community of property with or without the inclusion of the accrual regime, they need to enter into an antenuptial contract. They would sign a document wherein they stipulate what matrimonial property regime would apply to the marriage. Other matters may be included in an antenuptial contract. For example, assets that should not be included in the calculation of the accrual.

The antenuptial contract is signed before a notary public and it is registered at the Deeds Office. In that way, the public would know that you are married out of community of property.

What happens if I did not enter into an antenuptial contract and want to change it later?

Should a couple get married and later decide to change the matrimonial property regime, they may do so with the consent of the High Court. A court application would have to be made to the High Court explaining to the court why they wish to change the matrimonial property regime and also which property regime they now wish to apply to them.

Publication of Application to change the matrimonial property regime

Various other information would be included in the High Court Application which could entail details of various creditors of the spouses and their assets and liabilities and so on. Attached to the court documents would also be a draft postnuptial contract. The Application and the Court date would be published in the Government Gazette and one or two local newspapers for potential creditors to be informed about the pending Court Application.

Informing creditors of the change in the matrimonial property regime

Various creditors would also be notified of the application via registered mail. The application can be expensive because of the work and expenses involved. This cost includes attorney fees advocate fees, publication fees etc. It is therefore important to decide before the marriage whether or not the matrimonial property regime of community of property is the best regime for you before getting married. If it is not the best for you and your intended spouse, we advised that the enter into an antenuptial contract. This will not only save you money in the long run but also avoid a lot of complications in the future.

Speak to us should you wish to enter into an antenuptial contract. Our antenuptial contract product may be purchased here.

 

We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well.

Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links:

Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws

 

 

Related Post

Finding the best attorney or advocate for your matter in Cape Town is important. This is whether or not you are seeking a pro-bono lawyer or one that charges fees.

What follows are some frequently asked questions on lawyer and fees in family law matters.

How much does it cost to hire a lawyer in South Africa?

The cost of hiring a lawyer depends on several factors, including the lawyer’s experience and the complexity of the matter. For simple issues, you can seek assistance from a less experienced lawyer, while complex matters may require a more professional (and thus more expensive) lawyer. Therefore, the cost of hiring a lawyer varies depending on the specific circumstances of your case and the lawyer you choose.

What does a family lawyer do in South Africa?

A family lawyer in South Africa typically handles legal matters related to family relationships, such as divorce, child custody, and adoption. They provide legal advice, represent clients in court, and help negotiate settlements.

Is it possible to find a pro bono lawyer in South Africa?

A pro bono lawyer is one who would not charge you for legal services. In South Africa, most lawyers charge for their legal services. It is possible to find organizations that may assist you with your legal matter free of charge, such as legal clinics or pro bono organizations. You may also approach the legal aid board for legal assistance.

What is the difference between a lawyer and an attorney in South Africa?

In South Africa, the terms “lawyer” and “attorney” are often used interchangeably, but there are distinctions in the legal profession:
  1. Attorney: An attorney is a legal professional who has completed the necessary education, training, and practical experience to represent clients in legal matters. Attorneys can provide legal advice, draft documents, and represent clients in lower courts. They typically work in private practice or within firms.
  2. Advocate: In South Africa, an advocate is a specialist lawyer who represents clients in higher courts. Advocates are usually instructed by attorneys and focus on litigation and courtroom representation. They are similar to barristers in other legal systems.
  3. Lawyer: This is a broader term that encompasses both attorneys and advocates, as well as other legal professionals. It refers to anyone qualified to practice law.
In summary, all attorneys are lawyers, but not all lawyers are attorneys. Advocates represent a separate branch of legal professionals within the South African legal system

How much does an advocate charge per hour in South Africa?

In South Africa, the hourly rates charged by advocates can vary widely based on factors such as experience, expertise, the complexity of the case, and the geographical location. On average, advocates may charge anywhere from R1,000 to R5000 per hour or more. For junior advocates, the rates may be lower, while senior or highly specialized advocates may charge significantly more. It’s also common for advocates to offer fixed fees for specific services or cases, rather than hourly rates. If you need an advocate, it’s best to discuss fees upfront and ensure you understand the billing structure before proceeding.

What is the cost of a suit in law?

In South Africa, the cost of a suit in law, often referred to as legal fees for representation, can vary widely based on several factors:
  1. Type of Case: Legal fees differ depending on whether it’s a civil, criminal, family, or corporate matter.
  2. Experience of the Lawyer: More experienced attorneys or advocates may charge higher fees.
  3. Billing Structure: Some lawyers charge hourly rates, while others may offer fixed fees or contingency arrangements (especially in personal injury cases).
  4. Geographical Location: Fees may be higher in urban areas like Johannesburg or Cape Town compared to smaller towns.
On average, you might expect:
  • Hourly Rates: R1,000 to R5,000 for an advocate; R1,000 to R2,500 for an attorney.
  • Fixed Fees: These can range from a few thousand rand for straightforward matters to significantly more for complex cases.
It’s important to discuss costs and payment structures upfront with your legal representative.

Is the Family Advocate accessible?

Yes, the Family Advocate in South Africa is generally accessible to the public, particularly for matters related to family law, such as divorce, child custody, and maintenance issues. The Family Advocate’s office aims to assist with the resolution of disputes involving children, focusing on their best interests. How to Access the Family Advocate:
  1. Application: You can apply to the Family Advocate’s office directly. This often involves submitting specific forms related to your case.
  2. Court Referral: In some cases, the court may refer you to the Family Advocate for assistance in mediation or investigation.
  3. Contact Information: Each province has a Family Advocate’s office, and you can find contact details online or through local court offices.
  4. Free Services: The services provided by the Family Advocate are typically free, which makes them accessible for individuals who may not be able to afford private legal representation.
It’s advisable to check the specific requirements and processes for your region, as they may vary.

Civil Appeals to the Western Cape High Court

Did you know that if you are not satisfied with a decision in a court matter, you can appeal to the High Court? Someone might appeal a court’s decision for several reasons, typically revolving around the belief that an error was made during the trial or hearing or in the court’s interpretation of the law. Here are the main reasons for appealing a court decision:

Legal Errors

The appellant believes that the trial court made errors in applying or interpreting the law. This could include improperly admitting or excluding evidence or misinterpreting legal principles.

Procedural Errors

There were mistakes in the way the trial was conducted, such as improper procedures that could have affected the outcome. Examples include not following proper courtroom protocol or violating the defendant’s right to a fair trial.

Evidence Issues

The appellant might argue that crucial evidence was wrongly admitted or excluded or that there was insufficient evidence to justify the verdict reached by the magistrate or the judge.

Abuse of Discretion

The trial judge made decisions that are seen as unreasonable or arbitrary, such as unfairly limiting the scope of examination of witnesses or making biased rulings on motions.

New Evidence

New evidence has emerged that could potentially change the outcome of the case. This is more common in criminal cases, where new evidence might show the defendant’s innocence.

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

In criminal cases, the defendant might argue that their attorney did not provide competent legal representation, thereby affecting the trial’s outcome. Appeals are typically reviewed by a higher court, which examines the record of the proceedings from the lower court to determine if there were significant errors that affected the case’s outcome. If the appellate court finds that errors were indeed made, it might reverse the decision, order a new trial, or modify the lower court’s decision. If no significant errors are found, the original decision is usually upheld.

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!