Father being refused contact to his child! What are his rights as a Father?

The concept of Family

Fam-i-ly. A three-syllable word, that means so much.  The concept of family is a very broad one and one that takes more than one form. There is the traditional form, and a more modern one. When you say “she is family”, you may be referring to your father’s cousin, a grandparent, or a niece. However, people most often referred to are those closest to you, referring to blood relations, for example, a parent or child. The most basic social unit of what a family comprises of – two parents and in most cases a child.
We are conveniently located in the Pinnacle Building, in the Cape Town CBD. Click here to call us on (021) 4243487 or send us an email.
However, the law now sees people as family who are not necessary married to each other in law, but who may be cohabiting as life partners, bringing a more modern concept to it. As the law recognises family relations, it therefore imposes certain rights, obligations, and certain restraints when it comes to family. For example, spouses have a legal obligation to maintain each other, and you may not marry your sibling. Another example is that of inheritance, even if you never knew you had a child, at your death, he or she would inherit from you if you die intestate, all just because, you are Fam-i-ly.

What is a father?

This article deals with the legal relationship between a biological father and a child. Not all men are blessed with being referred to as a father. In order to be a father, you have to be a male parent to a child. The child must have been born from you. And therefore, every child can only have one father. However, from the moment you became a father, the law imposed certain rights and responsibilities. These responsibilities will remain until you or your child’s demise. The scope of this article is not to stipulate what a good or bad father is. It is to outline what the responsibilities and rights of a father are towards his child.

What are the father’s rights towards his child?

This article is inspired by the fact that many fathers who are not in a marital, or romantic relationship with the mother of his child, are refused the rights to exercise his parental rights and responsibilities towards his child. In South Africa, we have the Children’s Act 38 (Act 38 of 2005), which came into effect on 1 April 2010. Here section 10 of the Act is of use. It defines parental responsibilities and rights, which includes the right to care for the child, to maintain contact with the child, to act as guardian of the child; and to contribute to the maintenance of the child. Fathers of children born out of wedlock does not automatically have rights towards their child. In order for you to form part of such a child’s life you need to fulfil the requirements of section 21 of the Act, which basically states:
  • at the time of the child’s birth, you are living with the mother in a permanent life-partnership; and
  • you contribute or have attempted in good faith to contribute to the child’s upbringing for a reasonable period;
  • you contribute or have attempted in good faith to contribute towards expenses in connection with the maintenance of the child for a reasonable period.
Many fathers would have been married to the mother. Others would have meaningfully partook in the child’s life from birth. Therefore, there should generally be no difference between a child born from a marriage and a child born outside of a marriage.  To take the statement further, it is possible for a father of a child born out of wedlock to be the primary care giver of the child, where the mother is only entitled to see the child at certain times and circumstances, or not at all.

What is meant by the terms care and contact?

The question is now posed, what is meant by this right of care and contact a father has towards his child? The Act provides a very holistic understanding of the concept of care. This includes providing the child with proper accommodation, guidance, protection and so on. Basically, to do, and provide the child with whatever is in his or her best interests. Contact, on the other hand entails maintaining a personal relationship with the child, visiting or being visited by him or her, and communication with the child in various forms.

Can the mother of your child deny you contact and care rights?

Now we deal with the issue of whether or not the mother of your child can arbitrary deny you from exercising your parental responsibilities and rights of care and contact. Should a mother feel that the father of her child should have limited rights and care to his child; in order for her to limit his rights, the mother should have a very good reason for doing so. Her reason should be motivated by what is in the child’s best interest and nothing else. However, what is in the child’s best interest is an objective assessment and not a maternal one. All factors are to be considered. Therefore, by way of example, should the mother’s reason be that the father has a new girlfriend, or that she does not like his parents – that would not on the face of it be a good reason. Therefore, should the father unreasonably be refused care and contact, he can invoke the law. Should he decide to litigate, the court would assess the matter and make a ruling as to what is in the minor child’s best interest. The court may agree with the mother, or the father, or with none of them.

Final words to fathers

As a father of a child, you are legally afforded with certain parental responsibilities in relation to your child. In South African law, there is no distinction between the rights of a mother and that of a father in relation to a child if the father has full parental rights and responsibilities. However, what the law looks at is what would practically make sense when exercising those rights and responsibilities. In other words, we cannot cut the child in half. The yardstick is, what is in the child’s best interests. All families are different, with many variables at play. Therefore, if it would be in the minor child’s best interests to reside with their mother, that should happen. Even if the father only sees the child on Christmas eve, then that should be the case. However, in the same breath if it would be in the minor child’s best interest for the minor child to reside with the father and the mother to have contact once a month, then that should be enforced. Therefore, if you as a father are unreasonably being obstructed from exercising your rights of care and contact, get legal advice, and enforce your rights.

Sharing is Caring

This and other articles and posts found on this website are written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf to assist people with various family law related issues they may have. If you find any of our articles, free resources and posts interesting, or possibly useful to others, please like and share it on Social Media by clicking on the icons below. For more interesting articles and information on Family Law, view our articles and Q&A page. If you have a family law related legal issue and you want someone to answer or reply to it, feel free to post it on our Family Law Blog. Therefore, kindly like and share. Should you require any other legal services and advice, not related to family law, visit Private Legal.

Father being refused contact to his child! What are his rights as a Father?

The concept of Family

Fam-i-ly. A three-syllable word, that means so much.  The concept of family is a very broad one and one that takes more than one form. There is the traditional form, and a more modern one. When you say “she is family”, you may be referring to your father’s cousin, a grandparent, or a niece. However, people most often referred to are those closest to you, referring to blood relations, for example, a parent or child. The most basic social unit of what a family comprises of – two parents and in most cases a child.

We are conveniently located in the Pinnacle Building, in the Cape Town CBD. Click here to call us on (021) 4243487 or send us an email.

However, the law now sees people as family who are not necessary married to each other in law, but who may be cohabiting as life partners, bringing a more modern concept to it. As the law recognises family relations, it therefore imposes certain rights, obligations, and certain restraints when it comes to family. For example, spouses have a legal obligation to maintain each other, and you may not marry your sibling. Another example is that of inheritance, even if you never knew you had a child, at your death, he or she would inherit from you if you die intestate, all just because, you are Fam-i-ly.

What is a father?

This article deals with the legal relationship between a biological father and a child.

Not all men are blessed with being referred to as a father. In order to be a father, you have to be a male parent to a child. The child must have been born from you. And therefore, every child can only have one father. However, from the moment you became a father, the law imposed certain rights and responsibilities. These responsibilities will remain until you or your child’s demise. The scope of this article is not to stipulate what a good or bad father is. It is to outline what the responsibilities and rights of a father are towards his child.

What are the father’s rights towards his child?

This article is inspired by the fact that many fathers who are not in a marital, or romantic relationship with the mother of his child, are refused the rights to exercise his parental rights and responsibilities towards his child. In South Africa, we have the Children’s Act 38 (Act 38 of 2005), which came into effect on 1 April 2010. Here section 10 of the Act is of use. It defines parental responsibilities and rights, which includes the right to care for the child, to maintain contact with the child, to act as guardian of the child; and to contribute to the maintenance of the child.

Fathers of children born out of wedlock does not automatically have rights towards their child. In order for you to form part of such a child’s life you need to fulfil the requirements of section 21 of the Act, which basically states:

  • at the time of the child’s birth, you are living with the mother in a permanent life-partnership; and
  • you contribute or have attempted in good faith to contribute to the child’s upbringing for a reasonable period;
  • you contribute or have attempted in good faith to contribute towards expenses in connection with the maintenance of the child for a reasonable period.

Many fathers would have been married to the mother. Others would have meaningfully partook in the child’s life from birth. Therefore, there should generally be no difference between a child born from a marriage and a child born outside of a marriage.  To take the statement further, it is possible for a father of a child born out of wedlock to be the primary care giver of the child, where the mother is only entitled to see the child at certain times and circumstances, or not at all.

What is meant by the terms care and contact?

The question is now posed, what is meant by this right of care and contact a father has towards his child? The Act provides a very holistic understanding of the concept of care. This includes providing the child with proper accommodation, guidance, protection and so on. Basically, to do, and provide the child with whatever is in his or her best interests. Contact, on the other hand entails maintaining a personal relationship with the child, visiting or being visited by him or her, and communication with the child in various forms.

Can the mother of your child deny you contact and care rights?

Now we deal with the issue of whether or not the mother of your child can arbitrary deny you from exercising your parental responsibilities and rights of care and contact. Should a mother feel that the father of her child should have limited rights and care to his child; in order for her to limit his rights, the mother should have a very good reason for doing so. Her reason should be motivated by what is in the child’s best interest and nothing else.

However, what is in the child’s best interest is an objective assessment and not a maternal one. All factors are to be considered. Therefore, by way of example, should the mother’s reason be that the father has a new girlfriend, or that she does not like his parents – that would not on the face of it be a good reason. Therefore, should the father unreasonably be refused care and contact, he can invoke the law. Should he decide to litigate, the court would assess the matter and make a ruling as to what is in the minor child’s best interest. The court may agree with the mother, or the father, or with none of them.

Final words to fathers

As a father of a child, you are legally afforded with certain parental responsibilities in relation to your child. In South African law, there is no distinction between the rights of a mother and that of a father in relation to a child if the father has full parental rights and responsibilities. However, what the law looks at is what would practically make sense when exercising those rights and responsibilities. In other words, we cannot cut the child in half.

The yardstick is, what is in the child’s best interests. All families are different, with many variables at play. Therefore, if it would be in the minor child’s best interests to reside with their mother, that should happen. Even if the father only sees the child on Christmas eve, then that should be the case. However, in the same breath if it would be in the minor child’s best interest for the minor child to reside with the father and the mother to have contact once a month, then that should be enforced. Therefore, if you as a father are unreasonably being obstructed from exercising your rights of care and contact, get legal advice, and enforce your rights.

Sharing is Caring

This and other articles and posts found on this website are written by Adv. Muhammad Abduroaf to assist people with various family law related issues they may have. If you find any of our articles, free resources and posts interesting, or possibly useful to others, please like and share it on Social Media by clicking on the icons below. For more interesting articles and information on Family Law, view our articles and Q&A page. If you have a family law related legal issue and you want someone to answer or reply to it, feel free to post it on our Family Law Blog. Therefore, kindly like and share.

Should you require any other legal services and advice, not related to family law, visit Private Legal.

Related Post

Top tips from a Senior Family Law Advocate on how to deal with your Child Custody matter in the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court

 

Family law legal matters can be very stressful. This is so whether you live in Vanderbijlpark or any other city in South Africa. Especially so if you have no idea how the legal processes work. It is one thing to know that you are entitled to child support, but it is a totally different matter to know the law and procedure on how to claim child support. Luckily in child maintenance matters, the maintenance court is there to assist you in completing the application form. However, many times that is not enough. Especially so if the other parent has a lawyer and knows how to present the case for his or her client.

This article, however, deals with some top tips in care and contact or custody matters in the Children’s Court in Vanderbijlpark. It would explain the processes involved and advise on how to be best prepared for your matter. This advice is applicable whether you live in Vanderbijlpark or any other city in South Africa.

What to do before visiting the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court

Before you approach the Children’s Court in Vanderbijlpark, first try to resolve the issues with the other parent. Therefore, if you want more contact with your child and the other parent is refusing, try to resolve the matter first with that parent. If that does not work, try mediation. The mediator can be anyone, from a trusted mutual friend, priest, or other religious leaders, or a professional like an attorney, psychologist, or the office of the Family Advocate. Vanderbijlpark has many professionals that can assist you in this regard. If resolving the matter by yourselves is not possible, or mediation fails, then we suggest you approach the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court for assistance.

TIP: Focus on getting someone neutral to assist in mediating your matter. Organisations like FAMSA and FAMAC can be of assistance. Google them.

Approaching the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court

The Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court should be approached if it is the closest Children’s Court to you. You need to verify with the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court that you fall under their area of jurisdiction. If not, they would direct you to which Children’s Court is applicable to you.

Once you arrive at the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court, they will provide you with a form headed “Bringing Matter to Court in Terms of Section 53 Children’s Act, 2005 (Act no. 38 of 2005) Regulation Relating to Children’s Court and International Child Abduction, 2008 [Regulation 6]. This form is also called Form 2.

In this form, you will provide all your particulars and that of the child or children and the other parent. The sections in the form are as follows:

  • PART A: PARTICULARS OF CHILD(REN)
  • PART B: PARTICULARS OF *CHILD WHO IS AFFECTED BY OR INVOLVED IN THE MATTER/PERSON *ACTING IN THE INTEREST OF THE CHILD/*ON BEHALF OF THE CHILD WHO CANNOT ACT IN HIS/HER OWN NAME/ *MEMBER OF A GROUP OF CLASS OF CHILDREN/*IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST (SECTION 53(2)
  • PART C: PARTICULARS OF PERSONS HAVING AN INTEREST IN THE MATTER
  • PART D: PARTICULARS OF MATTER

In part D, the following is stated which you need to provide in the form:

  • Nature of matter brought to Court: (Please give full details of the matter e.g., registration/amendment of parenting plans, removal of child to safe care, children in need of care and protection, placement in youth care centers, adoption etc.
  • Documents: Are there any documents relating to the matter? (If so please attach)

Once you have completed the form and attached the relevant documents to it, you must take it to a commissioner of Oaths to have it commissioned. It does not have to be in Vanderbijlpark.

TIP: Draft a separate affidavit explaining your case. Outline some background information and reasons why the Court should give you what you request. Attach it to Form 2.

Processing your Application at the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court

Once you complete the Form A and submit it to the Clerk of the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court, they will process it and allocate it a case number or reference number. The Clerk of the Court would then allocate a date to the matter and advise the parties accordingly when the court date is. Please note that some courts follow a different process for processing the application and informing the parties of the court date. Please enquire from the Court when making the application what process they follow.

TIP: Obtain the contact details of the Court for you to contact them to obtain the Court date or other information. Ask for their contact number and email address.

Appearing in the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court

When notified of the Court date, both you and the other parent should attend. If you are making use of a lawyer (Advocate or Attorney), inform them timeously of the date. Depending on the Court, you may first see the Clerk or go directly to the Magistrate. The Children’s Court would do its best to try to resolve the matter. If the parents cannot come to an agreement, the Children’s Court may postpone the matter for either of the following:

  • Get a social worker involved in the matter;
  • Appoint a legal representative for the minor child;
  • Implement interim care and contact arrangements;
  • Having the parties attempt to agree on a parenting plan;
  •  

In serious matters, the Court may remove the minor child from both parents and place the child in foster care. The powers of the Children’s Court are extensive. It will, however, focus on what is in the child’s best interests.

TIP: Be as vocal as possible. Do not expect the Court to be understanding of your case or be on your side. It is your duty to explain your case and provide the Court with all the relevant information they require for them to make a fair decision.

Finalising the matter in the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court

Once the Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court has enough information to make a final decision, it will do so. Depending on the facts of the matter, that could either be making a Parenting Plan, an Order of the Court or a final care and contact Order. The Court may even make further interim orders, where the parties are to return to Court after a few months, or a year later.

TIP: Do not agree to something just because the social worker, a lawyer, or the Court suggest it. You need to be happy with what is decided.

The above Vanderbijlpark Children’s Court Application tips should apply to the following provinces and cities:

Eastern Cape:

Alice, Butterworth, East London, Graaff-Reinet, Grahamstown, King William’s Town, Mthatha

Port Elizabeth, Queenstown, Uitenhage, Zwelitsha

Free State:

Bethlehem. Bloemfontein, Jagersfontein, Kroonstad, Odendaalsrus, Parys, Phuthaditjhaba, Sasolburg, Virginia, Welkom

Gauteng:

Benoni, Boksburg, Brakpan, Carletonville, Germiston, Johannesburg, Krugersdorp, Pretoria, Randburg, Randfontein, Roodepoort, Soweto, Springs, Vanderbijlpark, Vereeniging

KwaZulu-Natal:

Durban, Empangeni, Ladysmith, Newcastle, Pietermaritzburg, Pinetown, Ulundi, Umlazi

Limpopo:

Giyani, Lebowakgomo, Musina, Phalaborwa, Polokwane, Seshego, Sibasa, Thabazimbi

Mpumalanga:

Emalahleni, Nelspruit, Secunda, North West, Klerksdorp, Mahikeng, Mmabatho, Potchefstroom, Rustenburg, Northern Cape, Kimberley, Kuruman, Port Nolloth

Western Cape:

Bellville, Vanderbijlpark, Constantia, George, Hopefield, Oudtshoorn, Paarl, Simon’s Town, Stellenbosch, Swellendam, Worcester

Zoom Link for Live Q&A Registration Form

[ninja_form id=85] Kindly complete the online form above. After submitting the form, it will take you to the page with the Zoom login details. Do not close the page until you have logged onto Zoom as the Zoom details wont be emailed to you. Only confirmation. Kindly note that this is a free platform and you would not be charged for the advice given online. You will also remain anonymous. Please note that Zoom sessions will not publish your video should you leave your video camera on. Only the audio would be published and/or broadcasted. We are looking forward to providing you with the advice online.  

The prohibition of wearing headscarves for females at work and places of learning despite religious convictions and the Supreme Law of the Republic of South Africa – The Constitution.

What practical use is the fundamental right to freedom, when you are not free to be free? What practical use is the fundamental right to practice one’s universally recognised religion, but you are told not to do so by your employer or educator?  Is brilliant legislation and policies meticulously crafted, framed and inked with scented oils onto canvas, of any practical worth, if it merely serves as an apparent reference, but not to be rigorously enforced and revered? This informative article has been undoubtedly inspired by the civil matter between Major Fatima Isaacs and the South African National Defence Force. Major Isaacs is facing possible dismissal for resolutely refusing to surreptitiously remove her hijab (headscarf) after being commanded to do so. What you will be reading does not deal with the latter case per se. However, in order to naturally keep it evergreen, it deals with the fundamental Constitutional principles at play.

Does the Constitution adequately protect one from religious oppression?

Is forcing someone to act directly contrary to his or her religious beliefs and moral convictions, not a grave form of oppression? Now, does the law, independent judiciary, and the modern state, actually adequately protect and rigorously enforce the civil rights of women to sufficiently cover their heads with a headscarf due to their religious tenants and convictions? May a female be forced to remove it, if such action would mean she is acting contrary to her religion and convictions, despite our Constitution? Hence, what does our Constitution state? With Thursday passed being the 10th observed anniversary of Nelson Mandela International Day, we naturally thought it opportune to gently tap into the modest wealth of knowledge of Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf, an advocate of the High Court of South Africa. He holds a Master of Laws Degree (LL.M) in Constitutional Litigation and weathered with over a decade and a half of successful litigation experience. Read on and find out what he has to say on the constitutional issue raised and enjoy him journeying us through the past.

What does Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf have to say on religious rights?

Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf: Sometimes, to adequately understand the present, one needs to sufficiently know the historic past. South Africa was plagued with racial discrimination in the dark challenging past. Its era formally began in the late 1940s when the National Party came into power. However, laws intentionally discriminating against non-whites were in existence prior to that. Laws were arrogantly created which directly afforded certain racial groups superiority and social dominance over others, in various facets of ordinary life. This can be illustrated by the following:
  • Various population groups were created. You would be classified as white, black, Indian coloured, etc.;
  • The use of public services and civic amenities was ethnically based on the distinctive colour of your skin. Hence certain beaches were reserved for fair-skinned people, and you could not sit (or stand) anywhere on a bus if you were of a darker shade;
  • Depending on the colour of your skin, you could only work in a certain industry. Unmistakably, certain racial groups would be capable of better empowering themselves;
  • If you were classified as being white, you would be lawfully entitled to the best of state provided education;
  • Mixed marriages were prohibited as well as extramarital sex between white and black people;
  • Your skin colour would instantly determine the private land you may rightfully own and where you may live;
  • Pass laws were rigorously enforced; and
  • Presidential elections were undoubtedly not free and fair.
The architects of Apartheid clearly knew what they were doing and meticulously executed their plan. One does not have to possess a doctoral degree in human rights to tacitly agree that the Apartheid laws were degrading, humiliating and a lasting disgrace to the very thread of humanity. Nonetheless, it was rigorously enforced by the courts of law, the police force, the military, and the navy, to mention a few. Naturally, the lasting legacy of apartheid still lives on in our local communities. When will this sadly end?

The birth of our Democratic Constitution and the right to freedom or religion

The demolishment of the fundamental pillars of apartheid on paper is intimately associated with the humble birth of our Constitution. We initially had the Interim Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993, which was assented to on 25 January 1994. And then we had the final Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996. Let us quote section 1 of the final Constitution:  “1. Republic of South Africa The Republic of South Africa is one, sovereign, democratic state founded on the following values:  
  1. Human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of human rights and freedoms.
 
  1. Non-racialism and non-sexism.
 
  1. Supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law.
 
  1. Universal adult suffrage, a national common voters roll, regular elections and a multi-party system of democratic government, to ensure accountability, responsiveness and openness.”
  What a wonderful piece of necessary legislation. It starkly contradicts past apartheid laws, social policies, and practices. Now the fundamental question is precisely; how supreme is it? For this, we look earnestly at Chapter 2 of the Constitution which we quote next:   “2. Supremacy of Constitution This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic; law or conduct inconsistent with it is invalid, and the obligations imposed by it must be fulfilled.”   What do you make of this? It does not only pronounce that racially discriminatory laws are invalid but at the same time, unconstitutional conduct is invalid as well. The section further places an obligation on the State and the general public to adhere to the spirit and letter of the Constitution. Therefore, all the Apartheid laws and practices which violated human rights are automatically invalid. On paper at least. The Bill of Rights Now we move to the social issue of civil Human rights as entrenched in our Constitution. Chapter 2 of our Constitution deals with the Bill of rights. Let us quote section 7 of the Bill: “7. Rights
  1. This Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of democracy in South Africa. It enshrines the rights of all people in our country and affirms the democratic values of human dignity, equality and freedom.”
This section is a radical change from what was the law and policy of South Africa during the Apartheid regime. Due to our Constitution, Apartheid is supposed to have vanished from our law books. Now let us unpack the Bill of Rights next. Chapter 2 deals with the following rights, and more:
  • Equality
  • Human Dignity
  • Life
  • Freedom and Security of the Person
  • Slavery, Servitude and Forced Labour
  • Privacy
  • Freedom of Religion, Belief and Opinion
  • Freedom of Expression
  • Assembly, Demonstration, Picket and Petition
  • Freedom of Association
  • Political Rights
  • Citizenship
  • Freedom of Movement and Residence
  • Freedom of Trade, Occupation and Profession
  • Labour Relations
  • Environment
  • Property
  • Housing
  • Health Care, Food Water and Social Security
  • Children
  • Education
  • Language and Culture
  • Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities
  • Access to Information
However, for the practical purpose of this article, we shall look keenly at the right to religion. This is entrenched in section 15 of our democratic Constitution, and it eloquently states the following:
  1. Freedom of religion, belief and opinion
  2. Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion.
Clearly, considering the introductory sections of this article in relation to the Constitution, does this not mean, that you have a right to observe and practice your religion as you are required to if it does not harm anyone else? Lastly, there is the limitation clause in our Constitution. It succinctly states the following: “36. Limitation of rights
  1. The rights in the Bill of Rights may be limited only in terms of law of general application to the extent that the limitation is reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom, taking into account all relevant factors, including ­
 
  1. the nature of the right;
 
  1. the importance of the purpose of the limitation;
 
  1. the nature and extent of the limitation;
 
  1. the relation between the limitation and its purpose; and
 
  1. less restrictive means to achieve the purpose.
 
  1. Except as provided in subsection (1) or in any other provision of the Constitution, no law may limit any right entrenched in the Bill of Rights.”
  After carefully considering the limitation clause, it is possible for an individual’s right to exercise his or her established religion to be limited. This is precisely where the crux of this article takes us. Is it possible for a specific employer, no matter the religious convictions of the longtime employee, to intentionally limit the proper exercise of the employee’s religious rights? Under the proper scenario, it is possible. However, one would have to be very creative and gently stretch one’s mind far to find a real-life example. One scenario could be consuming an intoxicating substance based on your religious convictions whilst on security duty at work.

Commanding an employee or student not to wear a headscarf due to her religious convictions and beliefs

Promptly returning to the controversial question posed earlier on; may an employer or educator direct a female to remove her headscarf where such removal would be tantamount to a fundamental violation of her religious beliefs? At first glance, one would answer no. It would be unpermitted. It would be in violation of the employee’s right to dignity and religious practice. Accordingly, the first necessary step is established which is correctly identifying a fundamental right which is protected under the Bill of Rights. This is the right to freedom of religion. However, remember, there is a limitation clause found in section 36(1) of our Constitution referred to above. Properly applying section 36(1) of our democratic Constitution, it is comprehensible that a right to wear a headscarf is fundamental and may not be limited. The employer or educator must have very good grounds to justify the limitation of those rights. If it is due to its uniform policy, or tradition, then that is not enough. If it relates to potential life-threatening dangers that the employer, educator, employee or student and others may suffer if a headscarf is worn; then in that hypothetical scenario, limiting the right may be justified.

In conclusion

We doubt that when the Freedom Charter was adopted in 1955 and the interim constitution born, that the architects, thereof, envisioned a South Africa where a woman would be forced to remove her headscarf in violation of her religious convictions. We are certain, that should Nelson Mandela been breathing today, he would have wisely held the same convictions. To all those people who are being discriminated against due to their religion or religious beliefs and convictions in the workplace, places of learning and in public, remember, you have rights which are there to protect you. It is however up to you to make use of it.

Share this article

We are certain that you found the above article useful and interesting. Please consider sharing it on the share buttons below. They include Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Gmail and more. Someone may find it useful as well. Should you require business advice or services, feel free to click on these links: Business SA | Private Legal | Envirolaws        

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!