Finding the best lawyer (attorney or advocate) for your legal matter – Top advice for anyone with a legal problem in South Africa

It is best to stay out of trouble. However, sometimes trouble finds you. And if that happens, you must obtain the best lawyer suited for you (attorney or advocate) to assist you with your legal problems. If you do not need an attorney or advocate to assist you with your matter, it may be best to first schedule a consultation with one, at least for peace of mind. Read on further to ensure you obtain the best legal practitioner (advocate or attorney) that suits your budget and case.

Is the top or best attorney or advocate necessary in every legal matter?

The legal problems people have varied from case to case. Some are simple. For example, a traffic fine which you wish to dispute. Others can have severe consequences on your life. For example, going through a divorce or being arrested and charged for a crime you did not (or did) commit. Whatever the legal issues, obtaining the best advice is always the best. It does not mean you need to source the top lawyers in South Africa for every legal problem. That would not make sense if the issues involved were relatively minor and the consequences were not dire. For example, if you are disputing a traffic fine of R 500 – 00, it does not make sense to consult with the top criminal lawyer in Cape Town, who may charge you R 5000 – 00 for the consultation. However, if you are facing jail time, consult with an experienced attorney or advocate who charges more than others based on their experience and is worth their fee.

What is the first step to take when faced with a legal problem?

When faced with a minor legal problem, it may be a good idea to research the topic first. For example, someone owes you money and does not want to pay you. Doing some basic research will tell you that you can send that person a letter of demand, and if that does not work, approach the small claims court. If you do not want to go through all that effort, approaching an attorney or advocate may be less stressful. However, there would be legal fees involved. And in some cases, the legal costs involved would be more than the amount claimed. If, on the other hand, there are serious legal consequences, for example, losing your home, jail time, custody of minor children and so on, we advise you best to obtain legal advice and assistance from the start. Usually, serious legal matters are time sensitive, and a delay can cause more significant issues. For example, if someone is suing you for money through the court, and you receive the summons, you have two weeks to file a notice informing the court you are defending the matter. If you do not do so within two weeks, the other party, the plaintiff, may obtain a default judgment against you.

Do senior advocates and attorneys charge more than junior lawyers?

The more experience an attorney or advocate has, the better they are for your case. That experience earns the advocate or attorney the right to charge more than his competitor with less experience and who may have to learn how to handle your matter. An experienced lawyer may charge more per hour but spend less time dealing with your matter. A less experienced lawyer may charge less per hour but spend many more hours dealing with your matter with less experience and skill than the senior lawyer would have. At the same time, it would be overkill to use a senior attorney or advocate if your case does not require their skills and expertise. In many cases, a junior lawyer would have the necessary skills and expertise to assist you as a senior advocate would. It would all depend on the nature and complexity of your case and whether your budget allows it.
Posted on by Telelaw

Finding the best lawyer (attorney or advocate) for your legal matter – Top advice for anyone with a legal problem in South Africa

It is best to stay out of trouble. However, sometimes trouble finds you. And if that happens, you must obtain the best lawyer suited for you (attorney or advocate) to assist you with your legal problems. If you do not need an attorney or advocate to assist you with your matter, it may be best to first schedule a consultation with one, at least for peace of mind. Read on further to ensure you obtain the best legal practitioner (advocate or attorney) that suits your budget and case.

Is the top or best attorney or advocate necessary in every legal matter?

The legal problems people have varied from case to case. Some are simple. For example, a traffic fine which you wish to dispute. Others can have severe consequences on your life. For example, going through a divorce or being arrested and charged for a crime you did not (or did) commit. Whatever the legal issues, obtaining the best advice is always the best. It does not mean you need to source the top lawyers in South Africa for every legal problem. That would not make sense if the issues involved were relatively minor and the consequences were not dire. For example, if you are disputing a traffic fine of R 500 – 00, it does not make sense to consult with the top criminal lawyer in Cape Town, who may charge you R 5000 – 00 for the consultation. However, if you are facing jail time, consult with an experienced attorney or advocate who charges more than others based on their experience and is worth their fee.

What is the first step to take when faced with a legal problem?

When faced with a minor legal problem, it may be a good idea to research the topic first. For example, someone owes you money and does not want to pay you. Doing some basic research will tell you that you can send that person a letter of demand, and if that does not work, approach the small claims court. If you do not want to go through all that effort, approaching an attorney or advocate may be less stressful. However, there would be legal fees involved. And in some cases, the legal costs involved would be more than the amount claimed.

If, on the other hand, there are serious legal consequences, for example, losing your home, jail time, custody of minor children and so on, we advise you best to obtain legal advice and assistance from the start. Usually, serious legal matters are time sensitive, and a delay can cause more significant issues. For example, if someone is suing you for money through the court, and you receive the summons, you have two weeks to file a notice informing the court you are defending the matter. If you do not do so within two weeks, the other party, the plaintiff, may obtain a default judgment against you.

Do senior advocates and attorneys charge more than junior lawyers?

The more experience an attorney or advocate has, the better they are for your case. That experience earns the advocate or attorney the right to charge more than his competitor with less experience and who may have to learn how to handle your matter. An experienced lawyer may charge more per hour but spend less time dealing with your matter. A less experienced lawyer may charge less per hour but spend many more hours dealing with your matter with less experience and skill than the senior lawyer would have.

At the same time, it would be overkill to use a senior attorney or advocate if your case does not require their skills and expertise. In many cases, a junior lawyer would have the necessary skills and expertise to assist you as a senior advocate would. It would all depend on the nature and complexity of your case and whether your budget allows it.

Related Post

What is the Status of Muslim Marriage in South Africa?

Women’s Legal Centre Trust v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (CCT 24/21) [2022] ZACC 23; 2022 (5) SA 323 (CC); 2023 (1) BCLR 80 (CC) (28 June 2022)

In the case of Women’s Legal Centre Trust v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (CCT 24/21) [2022] ZACC 23; 2022 (5) SA 323 (CC); 2023 (1) BCLR 80 (CC) (28 June 2022), the Constitutional Court deal with an issue relating to Muslim Marriage. The parties in the case where the following:

WOMEN’S LEGAL CENTRE TRUST                                              Applicant

and

PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA                First Respondent

MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL

DEVELOPMENT                                                                            Second Respondent

MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS                                                    Third Respondent

SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY                                 Fourth Respondent

CHAIRPERSON OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL

OF PROVINCES                                                                             Fifth Respondent

SOUTH AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION                     Sixth Respondent

COMMISSION FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION

OF THE RIGHTS OF CULTURAL, RELIGIOUS

AND LINGUISTIC COMMUNITIES                                                Seventh Respondent

LAJNATUN NISAA-IL MUSLIMAAT (ASSOCIATION

OF MUSLIM WOMEN OF SOUTH AFRICA)                                 Eighth Respondent

and

COMMISSION FOR GENDER EQUALITY                                   Intervening Party

and

MUSLIM ASSEMBLY CAPE                                                         First Amicus Curiae

UNITED ULAMA COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA                        Second Amicus Curiae

The Constitutional Court gave the following ruling:

“On application for confirmation of an order of constitutional invalidity granted by the Supreme Court of Appeal: 1. The Supreme Court of Appeal’s order of constitutional invalidity is confirmed: 1.1. The Marriage Act 25 of 1961 (Marriage Act) and the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 (Divorce Act) are declared to be inconsistent with sections 9, 10, 28 and 34 of the Constitution in that they fail to recognise marriages solemnised in accordance with Sharia law (Muslim marriages) which have not been registered as civil marriages, as valid marriages for all purposes in South Africa, and to regulate the consequences of such recognition. 1.2. It is declared that section 6 of the Divorce Act is inconsistent with sections 9, 10, 28(2) and 34 of the Constitution, insofar as it fails to provide for mechanisms to safeguard the welfare of minor or dependent children born of Muslim marriages, at the time of dissolution of the Muslim marriage in the same or similar manner as it provides for mechanisms to safeguard the welfare of minor or dependent children born of other marriages that are dissolved. 1.3. It is declared that section 7(3) of the Divorce Act is inconsistent with sections 9, 10, and 34 of the Constitution, insofar as it fails to provide for the redistribution of assets, on the dissolution of a Muslim marriage, when such redistribution would be just. 1.4. It is declared that section 9(1) of the Divorce Act is inconsistent with sections 9, 10 and 34 of the Constitution, insofar as it fails to make provision for the forfeiture of the patrimonial benefits of a Muslim marriage at the time of its dissolution in the same or similar terms as it does in respect of other marriages that are dissolved. 1.5. The common law definition of marriage is declared to be inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid to the extent that it excludes Muslim marriages. 1.6. The declarations of invalidity in paragraphs 1.1 to 1.5 above are suspended for a period of 24 months to enable the President and Cabinet, together with Parliament, to remedy the foregoing defects by either amending existing legislation, or initiating and passing new legislation within 24 months, in order to ensure the recognition of Muslim marriages as valid marriages for all purposes in South Africa and to regulate the consequences arising from such recognition. 1.7. Pending the coming into force of legislation or amendments to existing legislation referred to in paragraph 1.6, it is declared that Muslim marriages subsisting at 15 December 2014, being the date when this action was instituted in the High Court, or which had been terminated in terms of Sharia law as at 15 December 2014, but in respect of which legal proceedings have been instituted and which proceedings have not been finally determined as at the date of this order, may be dissolved in accordance with the Divorce Act as follows: (a) all the provisions of the Divorce Act shall be applicable, save that all Muslim marriages shall be treated as if they are out of community of property, except where there are agreements to the contrary, and (b) the provisions of section 7(3) of Divorce Act shall apply to such a union regardless of when it was concluded. (c) In the case of a husband who is a spouse in more than one Muslim marriage, the court: (i) shall take into consideration all relevant factors, including any contract or agreement between the relevant spouses, and must make any equitable order that it deems just; and (ii) may order that any person who in the court’s opinion has a sufficient interest in the matter be joined in the proceedings. 1.8. Pending the coming into force of legislation or amendments to existing legislation referred to in paragraph 1.6, it is declared that, from the date of this order, section 12(2) of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 applies to a prospective spouse in a Muslim marriage concluded after the date of this order. 1.9. Pending the coming into force of legislation or amendments to existing legislation referred to in paragraph 1.6, for the purpose of paragraph 1.8 above, the provisions of sections 3(1)(a), 3(3)(a) and 3(3)(b), 3(4)(a) and 3(4)(b), and 3(5) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to Muslim marriages. 1.10. If administrative or practical problems arise in the implementation of this order, any interested person may approach this Court for a variation of this order. 1.11. The Department of Home Affairs and the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development shall publish a summary of the orders in paragraphs 1.1 to 1.10 above widely in newspapers and on radio stations, whichever is feasible, without delay. 2. The conditional cross appeal by the Women’s Legal Centre Trust, and the appeals by the South African Human Rights Commission and Commission for Gender Equality are dismissed. 3. The President and the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development must pay the Women’s Legal Centre Trust’s costs of this application, including the costs of two counsel.”

Status of Muslim Marriages in South Africa

Considering the latter judgment, Muslim Marriages are seen as valid marriages. However, the South African legal framework needs to be changed to allow for its incorporation.

Posted on by Telelaw

Do you require a video legal advice consultation?

Click here and schedule one today!